Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CDC Kerala 15: Developmental Evaluation Clinic (2–10 y) – Developmental Diagnosis and Use of Home Intervention Package

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To describe the last 5 years' experience of Child Development Centre (CDC), Kerala Developmental Evaluation Clinic II for children between 2 and 10 y, referred for suspicion of developmental lag in the preschool years and scholastic difficulty in the primary classes with specific focus on developmental profile and the experience of the home based intervention package taught to the mothers.

Methods

A team of evaluators including developmental therapist, preschool teacher with special training in clinical child development, speech therapist, special educator, clinical psychologist and developmental pediatrician assessed all the children referred to CDC Kerala. Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST-II), Vineland Social Maturity Scale (VSMS) and Intelligent Quotient (IQ) tests were administered to all children below 6 y and those above 6 with apparent developmental delay.

Results

Speech/delay (35.9 %), behavior problem (15.4 %), global delay/ intellectual disability (15.4 %), learning problem (10.9 %), pervasive developmental disorders (7.7 %), seizure disorder (1.7 %), hearing impairment (0.7 %), and visual impairment (0.7 %) were the clinical diagnosis by a developmental pediatrician. Each child with developmental problem was offered a home based intervention package consisting of developmental therapy and special education items, appropriate to the clinical diagnosis of the individual child and the same was taught to the mother.

Conclusions

The experience of conducting the developmental evaluation clinic for children between 2 and 10 y has shown that a team consisting of developmental therapist, speech therapist, preschool teacher, special educator, clinical child psychologist and developmental pediatrician, using appropriate test results of the child could make a clinical diagnosis good enough for providing early intervention therapy using a home based intervention package.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Squires J, Nickel RE, Eisert D. Early detection of developmental problems: strategies for monitoring young children in the practice setting. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1996;17:420–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glascoe FP, Dworkin PH. Obstacles to effective developmental surveillance: errors in clinical reasoning. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1993;14:344–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Glascoe FP. Early detection of developmental and behavioral problems. Pediatr Rev. 2000;21:272–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bierman JM, Conor A, Vaggi M, Honzik MP. Pediatrician’s assessments of the intelligence of 2 year olds and their mental scores. Pediatrics. 1994;93:299–403.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Shapiro H, Bresnick B. The Denver II: a major revision and restandardization of the Denver developmental screening test. Pediatrics. 1992;89:91–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bzoch KR, League R. Receptive-expressive emergent language scale. 1st ed. Gainseville: The Tree of Life Press; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schopler E, Reichler RJ, DeVellis RF, Daly K. Toward objective classification of childhood autism: childhood autism rating scale (CARS). J Autism Dev Disord. 1980;10:91–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Darrah J, Redfern L, Maguire TO, Beaulne AP, Watt J. Intra-individual stability of rate of gross motor development in full term infants. Early Hum Dev. 1998;52:169–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aylward GP. Conceptual issues in developmental screening and assessment. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1997;18:340–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation and support received from staff of Child Development Centre, Kerala, specially Dr. G. Suresh Kumar, Registrar; Ms. Deepa N.R., PS to Director; Mr. N. Asokan, PA to Director; Ms. Suja S, Junior Programmer; CDC, Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, in conduction of this study.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

This study is supported by Child Development Centre, Thiruvananthapuram.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. K. C. Nair.

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix 1 CDC Kerala: Home based intervention package for common disabilities (2–10 y)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nair, M.K.C., Lakshmi, M.A., Latha, S. et al. CDC Kerala 15: Developmental Evaluation Clinic (2–10 y) – Developmental Diagnosis and Use of Home Intervention Package. Indian J Pediatr 81 (Suppl 2), 142–150 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-014-1587-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-014-1587-0

Keywords

Navigation