Abstract
Climate change is significantly influencing phenology. One potential effect is that historically interacting partners will respond to climate change at different rates, creating the potential for a phenological mismatch among previously synchronized interacting species, or even sexes of the same species. Focusing on plant demographics in a plant–pollinator interaction, we develop a hybrid dynamical model that uses a “non-autonomous” differential equation system (Zonneveld model) for within-season dynamics and discrete equations for season-to-season dynamics. Our model outlines how and when changes in the relative phenologies of an interacting species pair will alter the demographic outcome of the interaction. For our plant–pollinator system, we find that plant population growth rates are particularly sensitive to phenology mismatch when flowers are short-lived, when pollinators are short-lived, or when flowers and pollinators exhibit high levels of within-population synchrony in emergence or arrival dates. More generally, our aim is to introduce the use of hybrid dynamical models as a framework through which researchers can directly explore the demographic consequences of climatically driven phenological change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alarcón R, Waser NM, Ollerton J (2008) Year-to-year variation in the topology of a plant–pollinator interaction network. Oikos 117(12):1796–1807. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16987.x
Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ, Olesen JM (2003) The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(16):9383–9387. doi:10.1073/pnas.1633576100
Both C, Bouwhuis S, Lessells CM, Visser ME (2006) Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird. Nature 441 (7089):81–83
Calabrese JM, Fagan WF (2004) Lost in time, lonely, and single: reproductive asynchrony and the Allee effect. Am Nat 164(1):25–37. doi:10.1086/421443
Calabrese JM, Ries L, Matter SF, Debinski DM, Auckland JN, Roland J, Fagan WF (2008) Reproductive asynchrony in natural butterfly populations and its consequences for female matelessness. J Anim Ecol 77(4):746–756. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01385.x
Doi H, Gordo O, Katano I (2008) Heterogeneous intra-annual climatic changes drive different phenological responses at two trophic levels. Climate Res 36(3):181
Dupont YL, Padrón B, Olesen JM, Petanidou T (2009) Spatio‐temporal variation in the structure of pollination networks. Oikos 118(8):1261–1269
Edwards M, Richardson AJ (2004) Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch. Nature 430(7002):881–884
Encinas-Viso F, Revilla TA, Etienne RS (2012) Phenology drives mutualistic network structure and diversity. Ecol Lett 15(3):198–208. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01726.x
Fagan WF, Cosner C, Larsen EA, Calabrese JM (2010) Reproductive asynchrony in spatial population models: how mating behavior can modulate Allee effects arising from isolation in both space and time. Am Nat 175(3):362–373
Forrest J, Inouye DW, Thomson JD (2010) Flowering phenology in subalpine meadows: does climate variation influence community co-flowering patterns? Ecology 91(2):431–440. doi:10.1890/09-0099.1
Forrest JRK, Thomson JD (2011) An examination of synchrony between insect emergence and flowering in Rocky Mountain meadows. Ecol Monogr 81(3):469–491. doi:10.1890/10-1885.1
Gates DJ, Nason JD (2012) Flowering asynchrony and mating system effects on reproductive assurance and mutualism persistence in fragmented fig–fig wasp populations. Am J Bot 99(4):757–768. doi:10.3732/ajb.1100472
Gilman RT, Fabina NS, Abbott KC, Rafferty NE (2012) Evolution of plant–pollinator mutualisms in response to climate change. Evol Appl 5(1):2–16. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00202.x
Harder LD, Johnson SD (2005) Adaptive plasticity of floral display size in animal-pollinated plants. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272(1581):2651–2657
Hedhly A, Hormaza JI, Herrero M (2009) Global warming and sexual plant reproduction. Trends Plant Sci 14(1):30–36. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.11.001
Hill JK, Hodkinson ID (1995) Effects of temperature on phenological synchrony and altitudinal distribution of jumping plant lice (Hemiptera: Psylloidea) on dwarf willow (Salix lapponum) in Norway. Ecol Entomol 20(3):237–244. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1995.tb00453.x
Iler AM, Inouye DW (2013) Increasing temporal synchrony between syrphid flies and their floral resources despite differential phenological responses to climate change. Global Change Biology. In press
Inouye DW (2008) Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers. Ecology 89(2):353–362. doi:10.1890/06-2128.1
Johansson J, Smallegange IM, Jonzén N (2012) An eco-evolutionary model for demographic and phenological responses in migratory birds. Biology 1(3):639–657
Jones MH, MacDonald SE, Henry GHR (1999) Sex- and habitat-specific responses of a high arctic willow, Salix arctica, to experimental climate change. Oikos 87(1):129–138. doi:10.2307/3547004
Kula AR (2012) Quantifying context-dependent outcomes of the interaction between Silene stellata (Caryophyllaceae) and its pollinating seed predator, Hadena ectypa (Noctuidae), a potential mutualist.
Larsen E, Calabrese JM, Rhainds M, Fagan WF (2013) How protandry and protogyny affect female mating failure: a spatial population model. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 146(1):130–140. doi:10.1111/eea.12003
Lynch HJ, Rhainds M, Calabrese JM, Cantrell S, Cosner C, Fagan WF (2013) How climate extremes-not means-define a species’ geographic range boundary via a demographic tipping point. Ecological Monographs
Mailleret L, Lemesle V (2009) A note on semi-discrete modelling in the life sciences. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 367(1908):4779–4799
McKinney AM, CaraDonna PJ, Inouye DW, Barr B, Bertelsen CD, Waser NM (2012) Asynchronous changes in phenology of migrating broad-tailed hummingbirds and their early-season nectar resources. Ecology 93(9):1987–1993
Memmott J, Craze PG, Waser NM, Price MV (2007) Global warming and the disruption of plant–pollinator interactions. Ecol Lett 10(8):710–717. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01061.x
Miller-Rushing AJ, Høye TT, Inouye DW, Post E (2010) The effects of phenological mismatches on demography. Philos Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 365(1555):3177–3186. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0148
Minckley R (2008) Faunal composition and species richness differences of bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) from two north American regions. Apidologie 39(1):176–188
Moraes PLRD, Monteiro R, Vencovsky R (1999) Conservação genética de populações de Cryptocarya moschata Nees (Lauraceae) na Mata Atlântica do estado de São Paulo. Revista brasileira de Botânica 22 22(Suppl 2):237–248
Nakazawa T, Doi H (2012) A perspective on match/mismatch of phenology in community contexts. Oikos 121(4):489–495. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20171.x
Parmesan C (2007) Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Glob Chang Biol 13(9):1860–1872. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01404.x
Post E, Forchhammer MC, Stenseth NC, Callaghan TV (2001a) The timing of life—history events in a changing climate. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 268(1462):15–23
Post E, Levin SA, Iwasa Y, Stenseth NC (2001b) Reproductive asynchrony increases with environmental disturbance. Evolution 55(4):830–834
Primack RB (1985) Longevity of individual flowers. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:15–37. doi:10.2307/2097041
Rafferty NE, Ives AR (2011a) Effects of experimental shifts in flowering phenology on plant–pollinator interactions. Ecol Lett 14(1):69–74. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01557.x
Rafferty NE, Ives AR (2011b) Pollinator effectiveness varies with experimental shifts in flowering time. Ecology 93(4):803–814. doi:10.1890/11-0967.1
Rathcke B (1983) Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. Pollination biology: 305-329
Rathcke B, Lacey EP (1985) Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:179–214. doi:10.2307/2097047
Rodriguez J, Jordano D, Haeger JF (1994) Spatial heterogeneity in a butterfly-host plant interaction. Journal of Animal Ecology:31-38
Rudolf VH, Singh M (2013) Disentangling climate change effects on species interactions: effects of temperature, phenological shifts, and body size. Oecologia:1-10
Russell FL, Louda S (2004) Phenological synchrony affects interaction strength of an exotic weevil with Platte thistle, a native host plant. Oecologia 139(4):525–534. doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1543-1
Schleuning M, Fründ J, Klein A-M, Abrahamczyk S, Alarcón R, Albrecht M, Andersson GK, Bazarian S, Böhning-Gaese K, Bommarco R (2012) Specialization of mutualistic interaction networks decreases toward tropical latitudes. Current Biology
Schlindwein C, Wittmann D (1997) Stamen movements in flowers of Opuntia (Cactaceae) favour oligolectic pollinators. PI Syst Evol 204(3–4):179–193. doi:10.1007/bf00989204
Schwartz MD, Hanes JM (2010) Intercomparing multiple measures of the onset of spring in eastern North America. Int J Climatol 30(11):1614–1626. doi:10.1002/joc.2008
Sheriff MJ, Kenagy GJ, Richter M, Lee T, Tøien Ø, Kohl F, Buck CL, Barnes BM (2011) Phenological variation in annual timing of hibernation and breeding in nearby populations of Arctic ground squirrels. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278(1716):2369–2375. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2482
Sherry RA, Zhou X, Gu S, Arnone JA, Schimel DS, Verburg PS, Wallace LL, Luo Y (2007) Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(1):198–202. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605642104
Thompson RM, Beardall J, Beringer J, Grace M, Sardina P (2013) Means and extremes: building variability into community-level climate change experiments. Ecol Lett 16(6):799–806. doi:10.1111/ele.12095
Visser ME, Both C (2005) Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272(1581):2561–2569. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3356
Visser ME, Holleman LJM (2001) Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 268(1464):289–294. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1363
Visser ME, Noordwijk AJV, Tinbergen JM, Lessells CM (1998) Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits (Parus major). Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 265(1408):1867–1870. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0514
Zipkin EF, Ries L, Reeves R, Regetz J, Oberhauser KS (2012) Tracking climate impacts on the migratory monarch butterfly. Glob Chang Biol 18(10):3039–3049. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02751.x
Zonneveld C (1992) Polyandry and protandry in butterflies. Bull Math Biol 54(6):957–976
Zonneveld C, Metz J (1991) Models on butterfly protandry: virgin females are at risk to die. Theoret Pop Biol 40(3):308–321
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the US National Science Foundation under grants DMS-1118623 (RSC and GCC) and DMS-1225917 (WFF) and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de nível Superior (CAPES) grant BEX 8971/11-0 (IGV).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 1.15 mb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fagan, W.F., Bewick, S., Cantrell, S. et al. Phenologically explicit models for studying plant–pollinator interactions under climate change. Theor Ecol 7, 289–297 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-014-0218-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-014-0218-8