Abstract
A classic community assembly hypothesis is that all guilds must be represented before additional species from any given guild enter the community. We conceptually extend this hypothesis to continuous functional traits, refine the hypothesis with an eco-evolutionary model of interaction network community assembly, and compare the resultant continuous trait assembly rule to empirical data. Our extension of the “guild assembly rule” to continuous functional traits was rejected, in part, because the eco-evolutionary model predicted trait assembly to be characterized by the expansion of trait space and trait/species sorting within trait space. Hence, the guild rule may not be broadly applicable. A “revised” assembly rule did, however, emerge from the eco-evolutionary model: as communities assemble, the range in trait values will increase to a maximum and then remain relatively constant irrespective of further changes in species richness. This rule makes the corollary prediction that the trait range will, on average, be a saturating function of species richness. To determine if the assembly rule is at work in natural communities, we compared this corollary prediction to empirical data. Consistent with our assembly rule, trait “space” (broadly defined) commonly saturates with species richness. Our assembly rule may thus represent a general constraint placed on community assembly. In addition, taxonomic scale similarly influences the predicted and empirically observed relationship between trait “space” and richness. Empirical support for the model’s predictions suggests that studying continuous functional traits in the context of eco-evolutionary models is a powerful approach for elucidating general processes of community assembly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams DC (2007) Organization of Plethodon salamander communities: guild-based community assembly. Ecology 88:1292–1299. doi:10.1890/06-0697
Andersen KH, Beyer JE (2006) Asymptotic size determines species abundance in the marine size spectrum. Am Nat 168:54–61. doi:10.1086/504849
Bangert RK, Whitman TG (2007) Genetic assembly rules and community phenotypes. Evol Ecol 21:549–560. doi:10.1007/s10682-006-9135-7
Bell G (2000) The distribution of abundance in neutral communities. Am Nat 155:606–617. doi:10.1086/303345
Bell G (2001) Neutral macroecology. Science 293:2413–2418. doi:10.1126/science.293.5539.2413
Belyea LR, Lancaster J (1999) Assembly rules within a contingent ecology. Oikos 86:402–416. doi:10.2307/3546646
Blondel J, Vuilleumier F, Marcus LF et al (1984) Is there ecomorphological convergence among Mediterranean bird communities of Chile, California, and France? In: Hecht MK, Wallace B, Prance GT (eds) Evolutionary biology, vol 18. Plenum Press, New York, pp 141–207
Bohannan BJM, Lenski RE (2000) Linking genetic change to community evolution: insights from studies of bacteria and bacteriophage. Ecol Lett 3:362–377. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00161.x
Brooks DR, Wiley EO (1988) Evolution as entropy: toward a unified theory of biology, 2nd edn. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Brown JH, Fox BJ, Kelt DA (2000) Assembly rules: desert rodent communities are structured at scales from local to continental. Am Nat 156:314–321. doi:10.1086/303385
Brown JH, Kelt DA, Fox BJ (2002) Assembly rules and competition in desert rodents. Am Nat 160:815–818. doi:10.1086/343882
Cattin MF, Bersier LF, Banasek-Richter C et al (2004) Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure. Nature 427:835–839. doi:10.1038/nature02327
Chase JM (2007) Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:17430–17434. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704350104
Clements FE (1916) Plant succession: an analyses of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institute, Washington D.C
Clements FE (1936) Nature and structure of the climax. J Ecol 24:252–284. doi:10.2307/2256278
Cody ML (1999) Assembly rules at different scales in plant and bird communities. In: Weiher E, Keddy P (eds) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
Cohen JE, Briand F, Newman CM (1990) Community food webs: data and theory. Springer, Berlin
Connor ER, Simberloff D (1979) The assembly of species communities: chance or competition. Ecology 60:1132–1140. doi:10.2307/1936961
Cornwell WK, Schwilk DW, Ackerly DD (2006) A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology 87:1465–1471. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1465:ATTFHF]2.0.CO;2
Cozar A, Garcia CM, Galvez JA et al (2008) Structuring pelagic trophic networks from the biomass size spectra. Ecol Modell 215:314–324. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.038
Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge
Doebeli M, Dieckmann U (2000) Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am Nat 156:S77–S101. doi:10.1086/303417
Drake JA (1990a) Communities as assembled structures: do rules govern pattern. Trends Ecol Evol 5:159–164. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(90)90223-Z
Drake JA (1990b) The mechanics of community assembly and succession. J Theor Biol 147:213–233. doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80053-0
Drake JA, Huxel GR, Hewitt CL (1996) Microcosms as models for generating and testing community theory. Ecology 77:670–677. doi:10.2307/2265489
Feeley K (2003) Analysis of avian communities in Lake Guri, Venezuela, using multiple assembly rule models. Oecologia 137:104–113. doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1321-5
Ferriere R, Bronstein JL, Rinaldi S et al (2002) Cheating and the evolutionary stability of mutualisms. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269:773–780. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1900
Ferriere R, Dieckmann U, Couvet D (2004) Evolutionary conservation biology. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
Findley JS (1976) The structure of bat communities. Am Nat 110:129–139. doi:10.1086/283053
Foote M (1993) Discordance and concordance between morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiolgy 19:185–204
Foote M (1997) The evolution of morphological diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:129–152. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.129
Fox BJ (1987) Species assembly and the evolution of community structure. Evol Ecol 1:201–213. doi:10.1007/BF02067551
Fox BJ (1989) Small mammal community pattern in Australian heathland: a taxonomic rule for species assembly. In: Morris DW, Abramsky Z, Fox BJ et al (eds) Patterns in the structure of mammalian communities. Texas Tech Museum Special Publication Series, Lubbock, pp 91–103
Fox BJ (1999) The genesis and development of guild assembly rules. In: Weiher E, Keddy PA (eds) Ecological assembly rules. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 23–57
Fox BJ, Brown JH (1993) Assembly rules for functional groups in North American desert rodent communities. Oikos 67:358–370. doi:10.2307/3545483
Fox BJ, Brown JH (1995) Reaffirming the validity of the assembly rule for functional groups or guilds. Oikos 73:125–132. doi:10.2307/3545735
Fox BJ, Kirkland GL (1992) North American soricid communities follow Australian small mammal assembly rule. J Mammal 73:491–503. doi:10.2307/1382015
Fukami T, Bezemer TM, Mortimer SR et al (2005) Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly. Ecol Lett 8:1283–1290. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00829.x
Fussmann GF, Loreau M, Abrams PA (2007) Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Funct Ecol 21:465–477. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01275.x
Gillooly JF, Allen AP, West GB et al (2005) The rate of DNA evolution: effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:140–145. doi:10.1073/pnas.0407735101
Gillooly JF, Mccoy MW, Allen AP (2007) Effects of metabolic rate on protein evolution. Biol Lett 3:655–659. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0403
Glasser JW (1982) On the causes of temporal change in communities: Modification of the biotic environment. Am Nat 119:375–390. doi:10.1086/283916
Gleason HA (1917) The structure and development of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53:7–26. doi:10.2307/2479933
Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53:7–26. doi:10.2307/2479933
Gotelli NJ, McCabe DJ (2002) Species co-occurrence: a meta-analysis of J. M. Diamond’s assembly rules model. Ecology 83:2091–2096
Gravel D, Canham CD, Beaudet M et al (2006) Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. Ecol Lett 9:399–409. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00884.x
Hairston NG, Ellner SP, Geber MA et al (2005) Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecol Lett 8:1114–1127. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00812.x
Hansen PJ, Bjornsen PK, Hansen BW (1997) Zooplankton grazing and growth: scaling within the 2–2,000-mu m body size range. Limnol Oceanogr 42:687–704
Hansen SK, Rainey PB, Haagensen JAJ et al (2007) Evolution of species interactions in a biofilm community. Nature 445:533–536. doi:10.1038/nature05514
Hoeinghaus DJ, Winemiller KO, Birnbaum JS (2007) Local and regional determinants of stream fish assemblage structure: inferences based on taxonomic vs. functional groups. J Biogeogr 34:324–338. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01587.x
Holdaway RJ, Sparrow AD (2006) Assembly rules operating along a primary riverbed–grassland successional sequence. J Ecol 94:1092–1102. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01170.x
Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton
Hubbell SP (2006) Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalence. Ecology 87:1387–1398. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1387:NTATEO]2.0.CO;2
Lawler SP (1993) Direct and indirect effects in microcosm communities of protists. Oecologia 93:184–190. doi:10.1007/BF00317669
Loeuille N, Loreau M (2005) Evolutionary emergence of size-structured food webs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:5761–5766. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408424102
Loeuille N, Loreau M (2006) Evolution of body size in food webs: does the energetic equivalence rule hold? Ecol Lett 9:171–178. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00861.x
McClain CR, Johnson NA, Rex MA (2004) Morphological disparity as a biodiversity metric in lower bathyal and abyssal gastropod assemblages. Evol 58:338–348
McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E et al (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol 21:178–185. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002
McKane AJ (2004) Evolving complex food webs. Eur Phys J B 38:287–295. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2004-00121-2
McKane AJ, Drossel B (2006) Models of food web evolution. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford
Moloney CL, Field JG (1989) General allometric equations for rates of nutrient-uptake, ingestion and respiration in plankton organisms. Limnol Oceanogr 34:1290–1299
Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002) Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett 5:402–411. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00339.x
Petchey OL, Evans KL, Fishburn IS et al (2007) Low functional diversity and no redundancy in British avian assemblages. J Anim Ecol 76:977–985. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01271.x
Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
Piechnik DA, Lawler SP, Martinez ND (2008) Food-web assembly during a classic biogeographic study: species’ “trophic breadth” corresponds to colonization order. Oikos 117:665–674. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.15915.x
Poff NL (1997) Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:391–409. doi:10.2307/1468026
Ricklefs RE (2007) History and divergence: explorations at the intersection of ecology and evolution. Am Nat 170:S56–S70. doi:10.1086/519402
Ricklefs RE, Miles DB (1994) Ecological and evolutionary inferences from morphology: an ecological perspective. In: Wainwright PC, Reilley SM (eds) Ecological morphology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ricklefs RE, Travis J (1980) A morphological approach to the study of avian community organization. Auk 97:321–338
Roughgarden J (1989) The structure and assembly of communities. In: Roughgarden J, May RM, Levin SA (eds) Perspectives in ecological theory. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, pp 203–226
Roy K, Foote M (1997) Morphological approaches to measuring biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 12:277–281. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)81026-9
Roy K, Balch DP, Hellberg ME (2001) Spatial patterns of morphological diversity across the Indo-Pacific: analyses using strombid gastropods. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:2503–2508. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1428
Sala E, Graham MH (2002) Community-wide distribution of predator–prey interaction strength in kelp forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3678–3683. doi:10.1073/pnas.052028499
Savage VM, Gillooly JF, Brown JH et al (2004) Effects of body size and temperature on population growth. Am Nat 163:429–441. doi:10.1086/381872
Simberloff D, Stone L, Dayan T (1999) Ruling out a community assembly rule: the method of favored states. In: Weiher E, Keddy P (eds) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 58–74
Skalski GT, Gilliam JF (2001) Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling type II model. Ecology 82:3083–3092
Stone L, Dayan T, Simberloff D (1996) Community-wide assembly patterns unmasked: the importance of species’ differing geographic ranges. Am Nat 148:997–1015. doi:10.1086/285968
Stone L, Dayan T, Simberloff D (2000) On desert rodents, favored states, and unresolved issues: scaling up and down regional assemblages and local communities. Am Nat 156:322–328. doi:10.1086/303384
Temperton VM, Hobbs RJ (2004) The search for ecological assembly rules and its relevance to restoration ecology. In: Temperton VM, Hobbs RJ, Nuttle T et al (eds) Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 34–54
Temperton VM, Hobbs RJ, Nuttle T et al (2004) Assembly rules and restoration ecology: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Island Press, Washington DC
Thompson JN (1998) Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends Ecol Evol 13:329–332. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01378-0
Travis J, Ricklefs RE (1983) A morphological comparison of island and mainland assemblages of neotropical birds. Oikos 41:434–441. doi:10.2307/3544103
Urban MC, Leibold MA, Amarasekare P et al (2008) The evolutionary ecology of metacommunities. Trends Ecol Evol 23:311–317. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.007
Venail PA, MacLean RC, Bouvier T et al (2008) Diversity and productivity peak at intermediate dispersal rate in evolving metacommunities. Nature 452:210–214. doi:10.1038/nature06554
Villeger S, Mouillot D (2008) Additive partitioning of diversity including species differences: a comment on Hardy & Senterre (2007). J Ecol 96:845–848. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01351.x
Weiher E, Keddy PA (1995) Assembly rules, null models and trait dispersion: new questions from old patterns. Oikos 74:159–164. doi:10.2307/3545686
Weiher E, Keddy PA (1999) Ecological assembly rules. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Weiher E, Clarke GDP, Keddy PA (1998) Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of plant species. Oikos 81:309–322. doi:10.2307/3547051
Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2000) Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 404:180–183. doi:10.1038/35006555
Winemiller KO (1991) Ecomorphological diversification in lowland freshwater fish assemblages from five biotic regions. Ecol Monogr 61:343–365. doi:10.2307/2937046
Yoshida T, Ellner SP, Jones LE et al (2007) Cryptic population dynamics: rapid evolution masks trophic interactions. PLoS Biol 5:1868–1879. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050235
Acknowledgements
We thank Regis Ferriere, Brian Enquist, and Nicolas Loeuille for insightful comments related to the interpretation of our modeling results and Molly Stegen for her continued support. NGS was supported by a National Science Foundation Post-Doctoral Fellowship in Bioinformatics (DBI-0805618) while working on this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Suppl. Fig. 1
(DOC 115 kb)
Suppl. Fig. 2
(DOC 277 kb)
Suppl. Fig. 3
(DOC 269 kb)
Suppl. Fig. 4
(DOC 176 kb)
Suppl. Fig. 5
(DOC 248 kb)
Suppl. Fig. 6
(DOC 2278 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stegen, J.C., Swenson, N.G. Functional trait assembly through ecological and evolutionary time. Theor Ecol 2, 239–250 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-009-0047-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-009-0047-3