Abstract
Results from simulation experiments are important in applied spatial econometrics to, for instance, assess the performance of spatial estimators and tests for finite samples. However, the traditional tabular and graphical formats for displaying simulation results in the literature have several disadvantages. These include loss of results, lack of intuitive synthesis, and difficulty in comparing results across multiple dimensions. We propose to address these challenges through a spatial visualization approach. This approach visualizes model precision and bias as well as the size and power of tests in map format. The advantage of this spatial approach is that these maps can display all results succinctly, enable an intuitive interpretation, and compare results efficiently across multiple dimensions of a simulation experiment. Due to the respective strengths of tables, graphs and maps, we propose this spatial approach as a supplement to traditional tabular and graphical display formats.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anselin, L.: Non-nested tests on the weight structure in spatial autoregressive models: Some Monte Carlo results. J Reg Sci 26(2), 267–284 (1986)
Anselin, L.: Spatial econometrics. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1988)
Anselin, L., Arribas-Bel, D.: Spatial fixed effects and spatial dependence. Working Paper, GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation (2011)
Anselin, L., Kelejian, H.: Testing for spatial error autocorrelation in the presence of endogenous regressors. Int Reg Sci Rev 20(1), 153 (1997)
Anselin, L., Moreno, R.: Properties of tests for spatial error components. Reg Sci Urban Econ 33(5), 595–618 (2003)
Anselin, L., Rey, S.: The performance of tests for spatial dependence in a linear regression. Technical Report, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA), University of California, Santa Barbara (1990)
Anselin, L., Rey, S.: Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geogr Anal 23(2), 112–131 (1991)
Baltagi, B.H., Song, S.H., Koh, W.: Testing panel data regression models with spatial error correlation. J Econom 117(1), 123–150 (2003)
Baltagi, B.H., Egger, P., Pfaffermayr, M.: A Monte Carlo study for pure and pretest estimators of a panel data model with spatially autocorrelated disturbances. Ann Econ Stat 87/88(3), 11–38 (2007)
Davidson, R., MacKinnon, J.G.: Graphical methods for investigating the size and power of hypothesis tests. Manch Sch 66(1), 1–26 (1998)
Egger, P., Larch, M., Pfaffermayr, M., Walde, J.: Small sample properties of maximum likelihood versus generalized method of moments based tests for spatially autocorrelated errors. Reg Sci Urban Econ 39(6), 670–678 (2009)
Fingleton, B., Le Gallo, J.: Endogeneity in a spatial context: Properties of estimators. In: Páez, A., Buliung, R.N., Gallo, J.L., Dallerba, S. (eds.) Progress in Spatial Analysis. Advances in Spatial Science, pp. 59–73. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Florax, R., de Graaff, T.: The performance of diagnostic tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models: a meta-analysis of simulation studies. In: Anselin, L., Florax, R., Rey, S. (eds.) Advances in Spatial Econometrics: Methodology, Tools and Applications, pp. 29–65. Springer, Berlin (2004)
Kelejian, H., Prucha, I.: A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. J Real Estate Finance Econ 17(1), 99–121 (1998)
Kelejian, H., Prucha, I.: A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. Int Econ Rev 40(2), 509–533 (1999)
Kelejian, H., Prucha, I.: HAC estimation in a spatial framework. J Econom 140(1), 131–154 (2007)
Kelejian, H.H., Robinson, D.P.: A suggested test for spatial autocorrelation and/or heteroskedasticity and corresponding Monte Carlo results. Reg Sci Urban Econ 28(4), 389–417 (1998)
Lambert, D.M., Brown, J.P., Florax, R.J.: A two-step estimator for a spatial lag model of counts: theory, small sample performance and an application. Reg Sci Urban Econ 40(4), 241–252 (2010)
Lee, L.F.: Asymptotic distributions of quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial autoregressive models. Econometrica 72(6), 1899–1925 (2004)
Lee, L.F., Liu, X.: Efficient gmm estimation of high order spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive disturbances. Econom Theory 26(01), 187–230 (2010)
López, F., Mur, J., Angulo, A.: Local estimation of spatial autocorrelation processes. In: Páez, A., Buliung, R.N., Gallo, J.L., Dallerba, S. (eds.) Progress in Spatial Analysis. Advances in Spatial Science, pp. 93–116. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Mur, J., Angulo, A.: Model selection strategies in a spatial setting: Some additional results. Reg Sci Urban Econ 39(2), 200–213 (2009)
Stakhovych, S., Bijmolt, T.H.: Specification of spatial models: a simulation study on weights matrices. Pap Reg Sci 88(2), 389–408 (2009)
Tufte, E.R.: The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2nd edn. Graphics Press, Nuneaton (2001)
Wilk, M.B., Gnanadesikan, R.: Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. Biometrika 33(1), 1–17 (1968)
Yu, H.L., Christakos, G., Bogaert, P.: Dealing with spatiotemporal heterogeneity: The generalized bme model. In: Páez, A., Buliung, R.N., Gallo, J.L., Dallerba, S. (eds.) Progress in Spatial Analysis. Advances in Spatial Science, pp. 75–92. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arribas-Bel, D., Koschinsky, J. & Amaral, P.V. Improving the multi-dimensional comparison of simulation results: a spatial visualization approach. Lett Spat Resour Sci 5, 55–63 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-011-0064-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-011-0064-x