Abstract
Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace independently discovered the mechanism of natural selection for evolutionary change. However, they viewed the working of selection differently. For Darwin, selection was always focused on the benefit for the individual. For Wallace, selection was as much something of benefit for the group as for the individual. This difference is traced to their different background political–economic views, with Darwin in favor of Adam Smith's view of society and Wallace following Robert Owen in being a socialist.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Browne J (1995) Charles Darwin: voyaging. Volume I of a biography. Knopf, New York
Browne J (2002) Charles Darwin: The power of place. Volume II of a biography. Knopf, New York
Chambers R (1844) Vestiges of the natural history of creation. Churchill, London
Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London
Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex, vol 1-2. John Murray, London
Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J Theor Biol 7:1–52
Hume D (1757) A natural history of religion. In: Wollheim R (ed) Hume on religion. Fontana, London (Reprint 1963)
Kutschera U (2003) A comparative analysis of the Darwin–Wallace papers and the development of the concept of natural selection. Theory Biosci 122:343–359
Kutschera U (2008) Darwin–Wallace principle of natural selection. Nature 453:27
Malthus TR (1798) An essay on the principle of population. In: Johnson J. MacMillan, New York (St. Paul’s Church-Yard. Reprint 1966)
Ruse M (1979) The Darwinian revolution: science red in tooth and claw. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ruse M (1980) Charles Darwin and group selection. Ann Sci 37:615–630
Ruse M (2008) Alfred Russel Wallace, the discovery of natural selection and the origins of humankind. In: Harman O, Dietrich MR (eds) Rebels, mavericks, and heretics in biology. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 20–36
Ruse M (ed) (2013a) The Cambridge companion to Darwin and evolutionary thought. Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge
Ruse M (2013b) The Gaia hypothesis: science on a pagan planet. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Smith A (1776) The wealth of nations. Modern Library, New York (Reprint 1937)
Spencer H (1852) A theory of population, deduced from the general law of animal fertility. Westminst Rev 1:468–501
Wallace AR (1858) On the tendency of varieties to depart indefinitely from the original type. J Proc Linn Soc Zool 3:53–62
Wallace AR (1870) Contributions to the theory of natural selection. Macmillan, London
Wallace AR (1900) Studies: scientific and social. Macmillan, London
Wallace AR (1905) My life: a record of events and opinions. Chapman and Hall, London
Wilson DS, Wilson EO (2007) Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quart Rev Biol 82:327–348
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is a contribution to the Special issue Alfred Russel Wallace (1823–1913): The man in the shadow of Charles Darwin—Guest Editors U. Kutschera, U. Hossfeld.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruse, M. Charles Robert Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace: their dispute over the units of selection. Theory Biosci. 132, 215–224 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-013-0190-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-013-0190-7