Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Should we design buildings that are less sensitive to occupant behaviour? A simulation study of effects of behaviour and design on office energy consumption

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an ideal world, occupants have an understanding of how building systems work and are motivated to use the systems as they were designed to be. There is considerable evidence, however, that occupants do not understand the principles of how buildings function and that they use the systems non-optimally. The purpose of the paper is to quantify the effect of occupant behaviour on energy consumption and show how it is affected by design strategies. Numerical simulations of an office were performed with the dynamic thermal simulation software TRNSYS. Three types of behaviour (‘careless’, ‘normal’, and ‘conscious’) and two types of design (‘ordinary’ and ‘robust’) were considered. The results show that the effect of occupant behaviour on energy consumption is greatly diminished with robust design solutions, solutions that make buildings less sensitive to occupant behaviour. The careless user consumes 75–79 % less energy if the robust design solutions are applied rather than the ordinary design solutions. It is argued that a realistic view of occupant behaviour is advantageous in the creation of energy-efficient buildings (that is, leaving less need to learn how buildings work, to be motivated to save energy, or to perform specific energy-saving actions). However, the possibility of personal control should not be eliminated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE. (2009). ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals, SI ed. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

  • Boerstra, A., Beuker, T., Loomans, M., & Hensen, J. (2013). Impact of available and perceived control on comfort and health in European offices. Architectural Science Review, 56, 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brager, G. S., Paliaga, G., & de Dear, R. (2004). Operable windows, personal control and occupant control. Ashrae Transactions, 110, 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrico, A. R., & Riemer, M. (2011). Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: an evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, M. J., Irvine, K. N., Lemon, M., & Shao, L. (2013). Promoting behaviour change through personalized energy feedback in offices. Building Research and Information, 41, 637–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D2 National Building Code of Finland. (2003). Indoor climate and ventilation of buildings, regulations and guidelines. Helsinki: Housing and Building Department, Ministry of the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, S. (2001). Making it obvious: designing feedback into energy consumption. In P. Bertoldi, A. Ricci, & A. de Almeida (Eds.), Energy efficiency in household appliances and lighting (pp. 685–696). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A., & Lessem, N. (2014). Saving power to conserve your reputation? The effectiveness of private versus public information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 67, 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, P., Welch, P., & Zeisel, J. (1986). The role of occupancy analysis in diagnosing total building performance. In G. Davis (Ed.), Building performance: function, preservation, and rehabilitation. Philadelphia: ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., Donnelly, K. A., & Laitner, J. A. (2010). Advanced metering initiatives and residential feedback programs: a meta-review for household electricity saving opportunities. Washington: American Council for an Energy-efficient Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabi, Andersen, R. V., Corgnati, S., & Olesen, B. W. (2012). Occupants’ window opening behaviour: a literature review of factors influencing occupant behaviour and models. Building and Environment, 58, 188–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faruqui, A., Sergici, S., & Sharif, A. (2010). The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption—a survey of the experimental evidence. Energy, 35, 1598–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1, 79–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M., & Oreszczyn, T. (2001). Occupant control of passive systems: the use of Venetian blinds. Building and Environment, 36, 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handgraaf, M. J. J., Van Lidth de Jeude, M. A., & Appelt, K. C. (2013). Public praise vs. private pay: effects of rewards on energy conservation in the workplace. Ecological Economics, 86, 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herkel, S., Knapp, U., & Pfafferott, J. (2008). Towards a model of user behaviour regarding the manual control of windows in office buildings. Building and Environment, 43, 588–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoes, P., Hensen, J. L. M., Loomans, M. G. L. C., de Vries, B., & Bourgeois, D. (2009). User behavior in whole building simulation. Energy and Buildings, 41, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, M., & Nicol, F. (1998). Understanding the adaptive approach to thermal comfort. ASHRAE Transactions, 104, 991–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D. R. G. (1979). The use of artificial lighting in relation to daylight levels and occupancy. Building and Environment, 14, 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junnila, S. (2007). The potential effect of end-users on energy conservation in office buildings. Facilities, 25, 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karjalainen, S. (2007). The characteristics of usable room temperature. VTT Publications 662. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karjalainen, S., & Koistinen, O. (2007). User problems with individual temperature control in offices. Building and Environment, 42, 2880–2887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karjalainen, S., & Vastamäki, R. (2007) Occupants have a false idea of comfortable summer season temperature. In Proceedings of Clima 2007 WellBeing Indoors. Helsinki, Finland.

  • Karlsson, F., Rohdin, P., & Persson, M.-L. (2007). Measured and predicted energy demand of a low energy building: important aspects when using Building Energy Simulation. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 28, 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W. (1987). Two theories of home heat control. In N. Quinn & D. C. Holland (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 222–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W., Feuermann, D., & McGarity, A. E. (1992). “I always turn it on super”: user decisions about when and how to operate room air conditioners. Energy and Buildings, 18, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. A., Beckman, A., Mitchell, W., & Duffie, A. (2012). TRNSYS 17, a TRaNsient SYstem Simulation program. Wisconsin: Solar Energy Laboratory, University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laine, J., & Saari, M. (1994). METOP, CFC-aineeton matalaenergiatoimistotalo [METOP, CFC-free low-energy office building]. Espoo: VTT Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaman, A. (1999) Window seat or aisle? Studies of buildings in use are showing the importance of personal control of one’s environment, which includes windows. Architects’ Journal, 3 March 1999.

  • Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2000). Productivity in buildings: the ‘killer’ variables. In D. Clements-Croome (Ed.), Creating the productive workplace (pp. 167–191). London: E & FN SPON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leygue, C. (2014). Saving energy in the workplace; why, and for whom? In Proceeding of Behave Conference. Oxford: Saïd Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littleford, T. J., & Ryley, S. K. (2014). Firth, context, control and the spillover of energy use behaviours between office and home settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, M. A. R., Antunes, C. H., & Martins, N. (2012). Energy behaviours as promoters of energy efficiency: a 21st century review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 4095–4104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, M., Cao, B., Zhou, X., Li, M., Zhang, J., Ouyang, Q., & Zhu, Y. (2014). Can personal control influence human thermal comfort? A field study in residential buildings in China in winter. Energy and Buildings, 72, 411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutzenhiser, L. (1992). A question of control: alternative patterns of room air-conditioner use. Energy and Buildings, 18, 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masoso, O. T., & Grobler, L. J. (2010). The dark side of occupants’ behaviour on building energy use. Energy and Buildings, 42, 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulville, M., Jones, K., & Huebner, G. (2014). The potential for energy reduction in UK commercial offices through effective management and behaviour change. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 10, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh, N., Nati, M., Headley, W. R., Gatersleben, B., Gluhak, A., Imran, M. A., & Uzzell, D. (2013). Individual energy use and feedback in an office setting: a field trial. Energy Policy, 62, 717–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J.F. (2001) Characterising occupant behaviour in buildings: towards a stochastic model of occupant use of windows, lights, blinds heaters and fans. In Proceedings of Building Simulation, Seventh International IBPSA Conference (pp. 1073–1078). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

  • Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, W. (2013) Occupant-proof buildings: can we design buildings that are robust against occupant behaviour? In 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association (pp. 1746–1754). Chambéry, France.

  • O’Brien, W., & Gunay, H. B. (2014). The contextual factors contributing to occupants’ adaptive comfort behaviors in offices—a review and proposed modeling framework. Building and Environment, 77, 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, W., Kapsis, K., & Athienitis, A. K. (2013). Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: a critical review. Building and Environment, 60, 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orland, B., Ram, N., Lang, D., Houser, K., Kling, N., & Coccia, M. (2014). Saving energy in an office environment: a serious game intervention. Energy and Buildings, 74, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palme, M., Isalgué, A., Coch, H., & Serra, R. (2006) Robust design: a way to control energy use from human behavior in architectural spaces. In Proceedings of the PLEA Conference, the 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneve, Switzerland.

  • Pfafferott, J., & Boerstra, A. (2014). Comfort, user behavior and energy efficiency—summary of a workshop at Windsor Conference 2014. The REHVA European HVAC Journal, 51, 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigg, S., Ejiers, M., & Reed, J. (1996) Behavioral aspects of lighting and occupancy sensors in private offices: a case study of a University Office Building. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (pp. 8.161–8.171). Pacific Grove, CA.

  • Rijal, Tuohy, P., Humphreys, M. A., Nicol, J. F., Samuel, A., & Clarke, J. (2007). Using results from field surveys to predict the effect of open windows on thermal comfort and energy use in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 39, 823–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siero, F. W., Bakker, A. B., Dekker, G. B., & Van den Burg, M. T. C. (1996). Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, A., Leygue, C., Bedwell, B., & O’Malley, C. (2014). Engaging with energy reduction: does a climate change frame have the potential for achieving broader sustainable behaviour? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Wymelenberg, K. (2012). Patterns of occupant interaction with window blinds: a literature review. Energy and Buildings, 51, 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Greenberg, S. (2015). Window operation and impacts on building energy consumption. Energy and Buildings, 92, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wargocki, & Seppänen, O. (Eds.). (2006). Indoor climate and productivity in offices. Rehva guidebook no. 6. Finland: Rehva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, C. A., Roberson, J. A., Brown, R. E., Payne, C. T., Nordman, B., & Koomey, J. G. (2001). Field surveys of office equipment operating patterns, LBNL-46930. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Barrett, P. (2012). Factors influencing the occupants’ window opening behaviour in a naturally ventilated office building. Building and Environment, 50, 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., Siebers, P., & Aickelin, U. (2011). Modelling electricity consumption in office buildings: an agent based approach. Energy and Buildings, 43, 2882–2892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work reported upon here has been supported by the Indoor Environment Program of RYM Ltd and the Evidence project funded by the Academy of Finland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044, Espoo, VTT, Finland

    Sami Karjalainen

Authors
  1. Sami Karjalainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Karjalainen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karjalainen, S. Should we design buildings that are less sensitive to occupant behaviour? A simulation study of effects of behaviour and design on office energy consumption. Energy Efficiency 9, 1257–1270 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9422-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9422-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation