Field demonstration of automated demand response for both winter and summer events in large buildings in the Pacific Northwest
There are growing strains on the electric grid as cooling peaks grow and equipment ages. Increased penetration of renewables on the grid is also straining electricity supply systems and the need for flexible demand is growing. This paper summarizes results of a series of field test of automated demand response systems in large buildings in the Pacific Northwest. The objective of the research was twofold. One objective was to evaluate the use demand response automation technologies. A second objective was to evaluate control strategies that could change the electric load shape in both winter and summer conditions. Winter conditions focused on cold winter mornings, a time when the electric grid is often stressed. The summer test evaluated DR strategies in the afternoon. We found that we could automate both winter and summer control strategies with the open automated demand response communication standard. The buildings were able to provide significant demand response in both winter and summer events.
- Borenstein, S. (2005). The long-run efficiency of real-time electricity pricing. Energy Journal, 26(3).
- Coughlin, K, Piette, MA, Goldman, C, Kiliccote, S (2009) Statistical analysis of baseline load models for non-residential buildings. Energy and Buildings 41: pp. 374-381 CrossRef
- Goldberg, M., & Agnew G. (2003). Protocol Development for Demand Response calculations: Findings and Recommendations. Prepared for the California Energy Commission by KEMA-Xenergy. CEC 400-02-017F.
- Kiliccote, S., Piette, M. A., & Dudley, J. H. (2010). Northwest Open Automated Demand Response Technology Demonstration Project, LBNL-2573E.
- Motegi, N., Piette, M. A., Watson, D. S., Kiliccote, S., & Xu, P. (2007). Introduction to Commercial Building Control Strategies and Techniques for Demand Response, LBNL-59975, May.
- Newsham, GR, Birt, B (2010) Demand-responsive lighting: a field study. Leukos 6: pp. 203-225
- OpenADR Alliance, OpenADR 2.0 Profile Specification, A Profile. Revision number 1.0. Document: 20110712-1. August 2012.
- Piette, M. A., Sezgen, O., Watson, D., Motegi, N., Shockman, C., & Ten Hope, L. (2005). Development and evaluation of fully automated demand response in large facilities, California Energy Commission report 500-2005-013.pdf. January.
- Piette, M. A., Watson, D., Motegi, N., & Kiliccote, S. (2006). Automated Critical Peak Pricing Field Tests: Pilot Program Description and Results. August 2007. LBNL-62218.
- Piette, M. A., Ghatikar, G., Kiliccote, S., Koch, E., Hennage, D., Palensky, P., & McParland, C. (2009). Open Automated Demand Response Communications Specification (Version 1.0). California Energy Commission, PIER Program. CEC-500-2009-063, LBNL-1779E.
- Quantum Consulting Inc. and Summit Blue Consulting, LLC. Working Group 2 Demand Response Program Evaluation-Program Year. (2004). Final Report. Prepared for Working Group 2 Measurement and Evaluation Committee. Berkeley CA and Boulder CO, December 2004.
- Rubinstein, F. M., & Kiliccote, S. (2007). Demand responsive lighting: a scoping study, LBNL-62226.
- The Brattle Group, Freeman, Sullivan & Co, Global Energy Partners, LLC. (2009). A National Assessment of Demand Response Potential. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Staff Report, June.
- Yin, R., Xu, P., Piette, M. A., & Kiliccote, S. (2010). Study on Auto-DR and Pre-cooling of Commercial Buildings with Thermal Mass in California. Energy and Buildings 42, No. 7: 967–975. LBNL-3541E.
- Field demonstration of automated demand response for both winter and summer events in large buildings in the Pacific Northwest
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Volume 6, Issue 4 , pp 671-684
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Demand response
- Automated demand response
- Dynamic peak load reduction
- Industry Sectors