Date: 06 May 2008
Towards a sustainable energy balance: progressive efficiency and the return of energy conservation
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
We argue that a primary focus on energy efficiency may not be sufficient to slow (and ultimately reverse) the growth in total energy consumption and carbon emissions. Instead, policy makers need to return to an earlier emphasis on “conservation,” with energy efficiency seen as a means rather than an end in itself. We briefly review the concept of “intensive” versus “extensive” variables (i.e., energy efficiency versus energy consumption) and why attention to both consumption and efficiency is essential for effective policy in a carbon- and oil-constrained world with increasingly brittle energy markets. To start, energy indicators and policy evaluation metrics need to reflect energy consumption, as well as efficiency. We introduce the concept of “progressive efficiency,” with the expected or required level of efficiency varying as a function of house size, appliance capacity, or more generally, the scale of energy services. We propose introducing progressive efficiency criteria first in consumer information programs (including appliance labeling categories) and then in voluntary rating and recognition programs such as ENERGY STAR. As acceptance grows, the concept could be extended to utility rebates, tax incentives, and ultimately to mandatory codes and standards. For these and other programs, incorporating criteria for consumption, as well as efficiency, offers a path for energy experts, policymakers, and the public to begin building consensus on energy policies that recognize the limits of resources and global carrying capacity. Ultimately, it is both necessary and, we believe, possible to manage energy consumption, not just efficiency, in order to achieve a sustainable energy balance. Along the way, we may find it possible to shift expectations away from perpetual growth and toward satisfaction with sufficiency.
Baker, L. (2004). Great big green monster mansions. Salon.com July 7, 2004. Retrieved August 20, 2004 from http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2004/07/07/green_big_houses/index.html.
Binswinger, M. (2001). Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecological Economics, 36(1), 119–132, July.CrossRef
Birol, F., & Keppler, J. H. (2000). Prices, technological development and the rebound effect. Energy Policy, 28(6/7), 425–432.
California Energy Circuit. (2004). “Livin’ large causes demand to surge in Inland Empire.” Retrieved August 20, 2004 from. http://www.californiaenergycircuit.net/
City of Aspen, Colorado. (2002). Adoption of the 1999 Aspen/Pitkin Energy Conservation Code, as Amendments to the City Building Code, Section 8.20.020. Retrieved September 20, 2004 from http://www.bpcnet.com/codes/aspen/_DATA/Title_8/20/020.html, August 13.
Consumers Union. (2006). Comments of Consumers Union of the US, Inc. to the Federal Trade Commission “Energy Labeling, Project No. R511994” 16 C.F.R. Part 305. Washington, DC. Jan. 13. Retrieved March 10, 2006 from http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/energylabeling/519870-00017.pdf
County of Marin [California]. (2002). Single family dwelling energy efficiency ordinance—Marin County, California. Retrieved September 20, 2004 from http://www.co.marin.ca.us/EFiles/BS/AgMn/02_1022/html/Item-17-ord.pdf
Diamond, R. and Moezzi, M. (2004). Changing trends: A brief history of the U.S. consumption of energy, water, beverage and tobacco, published in the Proceedings of the 2004 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Washington, DC, August, 2004.
Herring, H. (2006). Energy efficiency—a critical view. Energy, 31(1), 10–20.CrossRef
Howarth, R. B. (1997). Energy efficiency and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, XV(4), 1–9.CrossRef
Meier, A. (2000). Living in a carbon constrained world. Home Energy, March/April 2000.
Moezzi, M. (1998). The predicament of efficiency. Proceedings of the 1998 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Washington, DC: ACEEE.
Moezzi, M., & Diamond, R. (2005). Is efficiency enough? Towards a new framework for carbon savings in the California residential sector. California Energy Commission PIER report, Sacramento, California. LBNL Report-58580.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratories. (2005). Indicators of energy intensity in the United States.” Retrieved March 10, 2006 from http://intensityindicators.pnl.gov/
Prahl, D. (2000). Analysis of energy consumption, rating score, and house size. Washington, DC: U.S. Green Building Council.
Princen, T. (2005). The logic of sufficiency. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rudin, A. (2000). Why we should change our message from ‘Use energy efficiently’ to ‘ Use less energy’. Proceedings of the 2000 ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings. Washington, DC: ACEEE.
Siderius, H.-P. (2004). The end of energy efficiency improvements=The start of energy savings?! Proceedings of the 2004 ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings. Washington, DC: ACEEE.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. (2002). Energy conservation program for consumer products. 10CFR430—PART 430. Retrieved March 20, 2004 from http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_02/10cfr430_02.html
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (2006). US Statistical Abstract.” Retrieved March 20, 2006 from http://www.census.gov/statab/www/
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. (2004). Annual Energy Review. “Table 2.1a Energy Consumption by Sector, Selected Years, 1949–2004.” Retrieved March 20, 2006 from http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/pages/sec2_4.pdf
U.S. Federal Trade Commission. (2006). Appliance energy data. Listings for refrigerators and freezers as of May 1, 1006. Retrieved March 20, 2006 from http://www.ftc.gov/appliancedata
U.S. Green Building Council. (2005). Rating system for pilot demonstration of LEED for Homes Program. Version 1.72. Retrieved March 20, 2006 from http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CMSPageID=147
White House. (2002). “Global change policy book.” Washington, DC. Retrieved March 20, 2006 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/climatechange.html, February.
Wilhite, H., Lutzenhiser, L., Shove, E., & Kempton, W. (2000). Twenty years of energy demand management: We know more about behavior but how much do we know about demand? Proceedings of the 2000 ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings. Washington DC: ACEEE.
Wilhite, H., & Norgard, J. S. (2004). Equating efficiency with reduction: A self-deception in energy policy. Energy & Environment, Volume 15, Number 6, November 2004, pp. 991–1009 (19).
- Towards a sustainable energy balance: progressive efficiency and the return of energy conservation
Volume 1, Issue 3 , pp 175-188
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Energy consumption
- Energy conservation
- Energy efficiency
- Energy sufficiency
- Progressive efficiency
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Alliance to Save Energy, Washington, DC, USA
- 2. Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Building 90 Room 3074, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, USA
- 3. Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, USA
- 4. University of California Energy Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA
- 5. SenterNovem, The Hague, The Netherlands