Skip to main content
Log in

High performance predictive current control of a three phase VSI: An experimental assessment

  • Published:
Sadhana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Delay has a significant role to play in the implementation of the predictive current control scheme as large amount of calculations are involved. Compensating delay in the predictive current controller design can lead to an improved load current total harmonic distortion (THD) and also an increased switching frequency. Minimization of switching frequency while maintaining the lower value of load current THD requires multiple objective optimization which is achieved by optimizing a single objective function, constructed using weighting factors as a linear combination of individual objective function. The effect of weighting factor on the switching frequency minimization and the current tracking error with delay compensation for the two level voltage source inverter (VSI) are investigated in this paper. The outcomes of the predictive current control using an optimized weighting factor which is calculated using branch and bound algorithm with the delay compensation are compared with the PWM based current control scheme. The experimental tests are conducted on a 2.2 kW VSI to verify the simulation observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Rub H, Guzin ski J, Krzeminski Z, and Toliyat H A 2004 Predictive current control of voltage-source inverters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 51(3) 585–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose B K 2002 Modern power electronics and AC drives, 1 st ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes P, Kouro S, La Rocca B, Vargas R, Rodriguez J, Leon J I, Vazquez S, and Franquelo L G 2009 Guidelines for weighting factors design in Model Predictive Control of power converters and drives. IEEE Proc. ICIT, Gippsland, VIC, 1 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes P, Rodriguez J, Silva C, and Flores A 2012 Delay compensation in model predictive current control of a three-phase inverter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 59(2) 1323–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dordevic O, Jones M, and Levi E 2013 A comparison of carrier-based and space vector PWM techniques for three-level five-phase voltage source inverters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(2) 609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J R, Gonzalez S A, Herran M A, Judewicz M G, and Carrica D O 2014 Calculation-delay tolerant predictive current controller for three-phase inverters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(1) 233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz J 1994 Pulse width modulation for electronic power conversion. Proc. IEEE., 82 1194–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judewicz M G, Fischer J R, Herran M A, Gonzalez S A, and Carrica D O 2013 A robust model predictive control for grid-connected voltage-source inverters. IEEE Latin American Transactions, 11(1) 27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouro S, Cortes P, Vargas R, Ammann U, and Rodriguez J 2009 Model predictive control—a simple and powerful method to control power converters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 56(6) 1826–1838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan N, Undeland T M, and Robbins W P 1995 Power electronics, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal S K, Bose B K, Oleschuk V, and Pinto J O P 2003 SVPWM of three level three level inverters extending operation into over modulation region. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 88(2) 604–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preindl M, Schaltz E, and Thogersen P 2011 Switching frequency reduction using model predictive direct current control for high-power voltage source inverters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58(11) 2826–2835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez J and Cortes P 2012 Predictive control of power converters and electrical drives. New York: John Wiley & Sons

  • Rodriguez J, Pontt J, Silva S A, Correa P, Lezana P and Cortes P 2007 Predictive currentcontrol of a voltage source inverter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 54(1): 495–503

  • Saribulut L, Meral M E, Teke A and Tumay M 2012 Performance comparison of PWM methods for 27-level hybrid multilevel inverters. GU J. Sci. 25(3): 689–695

  • Shu Z, Tang J, Guo Y, and Lian J 2007 An efficient SVPWM algorithm with low computational overhead for three-phase inverters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 22(5) 1797–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to VIKAS KUMAR.

Appendix A

Appendix A

ᅟ Load parameters.
ᅟ IGBT Intelligent Power Module (25A, 1200V).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

KUMAR, V., GAUR, P. & MITTAL, A.P. High performance predictive current control of a three phase VSI: An experimental assessment. Sadhana 39, 1295–1310 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0298-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0298-6

Keywords

Navigation