Abstract
Delay has a significant role to play in the implementation of the predictive current control scheme as large amount of calculations are involved. Compensating delay in the predictive current controller design can lead to an improved load current total harmonic distortion (THD) and also an increased switching frequency. Minimization of switching frequency while maintaining the lower value of load current THD requires multiple objective optimization which is achieved by optimizing a single objective function, constructed using weighting factors as a linear combination of individual objective function. The effect of weighting factor on the switching frequency minimization and the current tracking error with delay compensation for the two level voltage source inverter (VSI) are investigated in this paper. The outcomes of the predictive current control using an optimized weighting factor which is calculated using branch and bound algorithm with the delay compensation are compared with the PWM based current control scheme. The experimental tests are conducted on a 2.2 kW VSI to verify the simulation observations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Rub H, Guzin ski J, Krzeminski Z, and Toliyat H A 2004 Predictive current control of voltage-source inverters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 51(3) 585–603
Bose B K 2002 Modern power electronics and AC drives, 1 st ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc
Cortes P, Kouro S, La Rocca B, Vargas R, Rodriguez J, Leon J I, Vazquez S, and Franquelo L G 2009 Guidelines for weighting factors design in Model Predictive Control of power converters and drives. IEEE Proc. ICIT, Gippsland, VIC, 1 1–7
Cortes P, Rodriguez J, Silva C, and Flores A 2012 Delay compensation in model predictive current control of a three-phase inverter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 59(2) 1323–1325
Dordevic O, Jones M, and Levi E 2013 A comparison of carrier-based and space vector PWM techniques for three-level five-phase voltage source inverters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(2) 609–619
Fischer J R, Gonzalez S A, Herran M A, Judewicz M G, and Carrica D O 2014 Calculation-delay tolerant predictive current controller for three-phase inverters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(1) 233–242
Holtz J 1994 Pulse width modulation for electronic power conversion. Proc. IEEE., 82 1194–1213
Judewicz M G, Fischer J R, Herran M A, Gonzalez S A, and Carrica D O 2013 A robust model predictive control for grid-connected voltage-source inverters. IEEE Latin American Transactions, 11(1) 27–33
Kouro S, Cortes P, Vargas R, Ammann U, and Rodriguez J 2009 Model predictive control—a simple and powerful method to control power converters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 56(6) 1826–1838
Mohan N, Undeland T M, and Robbins W P 1995 Power electronics, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley
Mondal S K, Bose B K, Oleschuk V, and Pinto J O P 2003 SVPWM of three level three level inverters extending operation into over modulation region. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 88(2) 604–611
Preindl M, Schaltz E, and Thogersen P 2011 Switching frequency reduction using model predictive direct current control for high-power voltage source inverters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58(11) 2826–2835
Rodriguez J and Cortes P 2012 Predictive control of power converters and electrical drives. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Rodriguez J, Pontt J, Silva S A, Correa P, Lezana P and Cortes P 2007 Predictive currentcontrol of a voltage source inverter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 54(1): 495–503
Saribulut L, Meral M E, Teke A and Tumay M 2012 Performance comparison of PWM methods for 27-level hybrid multilevel inverters. GU J. Sci. 25(3): 689–695
Shu Z, Tang J, Guo Y, and Lian J 2007 An efficient SVPWM algorithm with low computational overhead for three-phase inverters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 22(5) 1797–1805
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
KUMAR, V., GAUR, P. & MITTAL, A.P. High performance predictive current control of a three phase VSI: An experimental assessment. Sadhana 39, 1295–1310 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0298-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0298-6