Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of giant dipole resonance width at low temperatures – New perspectives

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High energy photons from the decay of giant dipole resonances (GDR) built on excited states provide an excellent probe in the study of nuclear structure properties, damping mechanisms etc., at finite temperatures. The dependence of GDR width on temperature (T) and angular momentum (J) has been the prime focus of many experimental and theoretical studies for the last few decades. The measured GDR widths for a wide range of nuclei at temperatures (1.5 < T < 2.5 MeV) and spins (upto fission limit) were well described by the thermal shape fluctuation model (TSFM). But, at low temperatures (T < 1.5 MeV) there are large discrepancies between the existing theoretical models. The problem is compounded as there are very few experimental data in this region. At Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, Kolkata, a programme for the systematic measurement of GDR width at very low temperatures has been initiated with precise experimental techniques. Several experiments have been performed by bombarding 7–12 MeV/nucleon alpha beam on various targets (63Cu, 115In and 197Au) and new datasets have been obtained at low temperatures (T < 1.5 MeV) and at very low spins (\(J < 20 \hbar \)). The TSFM completely fails to represent the experimental data at these low temperatures in the entire mass range. In fact, the GDR width appears to be constant at its ground state value until a critical temperature is reached and subsequently increases thereafter, whereas the TSFM predicts a gradual increase of GDR width from its ground state value for T > 0 MeV. In order to explain this discrepancy at low T, a new formalism has been put forward by including GDR induced quadrupole moment in the TSFM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M N Harakeh and A van der Woude, Giant resonances, fundamental high-frequency modes of nuclear excitation (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2001)

  2. P F Bortignon et al, Nucl. Phys. A 460, 149 (1986)

  3. P Donati et al, Phys. Lett. B 383, 15 (1996)

  4. A R Junghans et al, Phys. Lett. B 670, 200 (2008)

  5. M Thoennessen, Nucl. Phys. A 731, 131 (2004) and references therein

  6. Y Alhassid, B Bush and S Levit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1926 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. P Heckman et al, Phys. Lett. B 555, 43 (2003)

  8. F Camera et al, Phys. Lett. B 560, 155 (2003)

  9. Deepak Pandit et al, Phys. Lett. B 690, 473 (2010)

  10. Nguyen Dinh Dang and Akito Arima, Phys. Rev. C 68, 044303 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. T Baumann et al, Nucl. Phys. A 635, 428 (1998)

  12. E Ramakrishnan et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2025 (1996)

  13. S Mukhopadhayay et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 582, 603 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deepak Pandit et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 624, 148 (2010)

  15. K Banerjee et al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 608, 440 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. R Brun et al, GEANT3, CERN-DD/EE/84-1, 1986

  17. M P Kelly, K A Snover, J P S van Schagen et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3404 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. F Puhlhofer, Nucl. Phys. 280, 267 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  19. H Nifennecker and J A Pinston, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 40, 113 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. A V Ignatyuk, G N Smirenkin and A S Tishin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 21, 255 (1975) [Yad. Fiz. 21, 485 (1975)]

  21. D Kusnezov, Y Alhassid, and K A Snover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 542 (1998) and references therein

  22. S Mukhopadhyay et al, Phys. Lett. B 709, 9 (2012)

  23. P Moller et al, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59, 185 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Deepak Pandit et al, Phys. Lett. B 713, 434 (2012)

  25. M K Habior et al, Phys. Rev. C 36, 612 (1987)

  26. Deepak Pandit et al, Phys. Rev. C 81, 061302(R) (2010)

  27. C Simenel and Ph Chomaz, Phys. Rev. C 68, 024302 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. C Simenel and Ph Chomaz, Phys. Rev. C 80, 064309 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. M Goldhaber and E Teller, Phys. Rev. 74, 1046 (1948)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the collaborators of this work, especially Sudhee Ranjan Banerjee, Surajit Pal and Deepak Pandit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S MUKHOPADHYAY.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MUKHOPADHYAY, S. Evolution of giant dipole resonance width at low temperatures – New perspectives. Pramana - J Phys 82, 779–787 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-014-0728-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-014-0728-3

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation