Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geomorphic observations from southwestern terminus of Palghat Gap, south India and their tectonic implications

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The region around Wadakkancheri, Trichur District, Kerala is known for microseismic activity, since 1989. Studies, subsequent to 2nd December 1994 (M =4.3) earthquake, identified a south dipping active fault (Desamangalam Fault) that may have influenced the course of Bharathapuzha River. The ongoing seismicity is concentrated on southeast of Wadakkancheri and the present study concentrated further south of Desamangalam Fault. The present study identifies the northwestern continuity of NW–SE trending Periyar lineament, which appears to have been segmented in the area. To identify the subtle landform modifications induced by ongoing tectonic adjustments, we focused on morphometric analysis. The NW–SE trending lineaments appear to be controlling the sinuosity of smaller rivers in the area, and most of the elongated drainage basins follow the same trend. The anomalies shown in conventional morphometric parameters, used for defining basins, are also closely associated with the NW–SE trending Periyar lineament/s. A number of brittle faults that appear to have been moved are consistent with the present stress regime and these are identified along the NW–SE trending lineaments. The current seismic activities also coincide with the zone of these lineaments as well as at the southeastern end of Periyar lineament. These observations suggest that the NW–SE trending Periyar lineaments/faults may be responding to the present N–S trending compressional stress regime and reflected as the subtle readjustments of the drainage configuration in the area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basu K L 1964 A note on the Coimbatore earthquake of 8th February 1900; Indian J. Meteor. Geophys. 15 281– 286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar Rao Y J, Chetty T R K, Janardhan A S and Gopalan K 1996 Sm–Nd and Rb–Sr ages and P–T history of the Archaean Sittampundi and Bhavani layered meta-anorthosite complexes in Cauvery shear zone system, south India: Evidence for Neoproterozoic reworking of Archaean crust; Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 125 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn R L, Parry W T, Yonkee W A and Thomson T 1994 Fracturing and hydrothermal alteration in normal fault zones; PAGEOPH 142 609–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caine J S, Evans J P and Forster C B 1996 Fault zone architecture and permeability structure; Geology 24 1025–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox R T 1994 Analysis of drainage basin asymmetry as a rapid technique to identify areas of possible Quaternary tilt-block tectonics: An example from the Mississippi embayment; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 106 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz E, Nair P K R and Prasannakumar V 2000 Palghat Gap – a dextural shear zone from the south Indian granulite terrain; Gondwana Res. 3 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury S A and Holt R W 1980 The tectonic framework of the south Indian craton – a reconnaissance involving LANDSAT imagery; Tectonophys. 65 T1–T15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh J G, de Wit M J and Zartman R E 2004 Age and tectonic evolution of Neoproterozoic ductile shear zones in the southern granulite terrain of India, with implications for Gondwana studies; Tectonics 23 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowd T N, Srirama Rao S V and Gaur V K 1992 Tectonic stress field in the Indian subcontinent; J. Geophys. Res. 97 11,879–11,888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grady J L 1971 Deep main faults in south India; J. Geol. Soc. India 12 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • GSI 1992 Quadrangle Geological map; 58B.

  • GSI 2000 Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs; GSI Spec. Publ. no. 72.

  • Hare P W and Gardner T W 1985 Geomorphic indicators of vertical neotectonism along converging plate margins, Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica; In: Tectonic Geomorphology (eds) Morisawa M and Hack J T (Boston: Allen and Unwin), pp. 75–104.

  • Holbrook J and Schumm S A 1999 Geomorphic and sedimentary response of the river to tectonic deformation: A brief review and critique of a tool for recognizing subtle epirogenic deformation in modern and ancient setting; Tectonophys. 305 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton R E 1945 Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 56 275–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMD 1995 Report on micro earthquake survey in Trichur district Kerala; 18p.

  • John B 2003 Characteristics of near surface crustal deformation associated with shield seismicity: Two examples from peninsular India; Unpublished PhD thesis, Cochin University of Science and Technology.

  • John B and Rajendran C P 2005 Constraining the pattern of deformation associated with low-displacement faults in the cratonic regions: An example from the Precambrian province of Kerala, south India; J. Geol. Soc. India 66 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • John B and Rajendran C P 2008 Geomorphic indicators of Neotectonism from the Precambrian terrain of peninsular India: A study from the Bharathapuzha Basin, Kerala ; J. Geol. Soc. India 71 827–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • John B and Rajendran C P 2009 Evidence of episodic brittle faulting in the cratonic part of the peninsular India and its implications for seismic hazard in slow deforming regions; Tectonophys. 471 240–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen D W 1990 Adjustment of alluvial river morphology and process to localized active tectonics; PhD thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

  • Keller E A and Pinter N 1996 Active Tectonics; Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd., London.

  • Krishnaswami V S 1981 The Deccan volcanic episode: Related volcanism and geothermal manifestations; In: Deccan volcanism (eds) Subbarao K V and Sukheswala R N, Geol. Soc. India Memoir 3 1–7.

  • Marshak S and Mitra G 1988 Basic methods of structural geology; Prentice Hall, 446p.

  • Mishra D C, Singh A P and Rao M B S V 1989 Idukki earthquake and the associated tectonics from Gravity study; J. Geol. Soc. India 34 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair M M 1990 Structural trend line patterns and lineaments of the Western Ghats, south of 13 latitude; J. Geol. Soc. India 35 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi S 1985 Response of alluvial rivers to slow active tectonic movement; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 96 504–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panek T 2004 The use of morphometric parameters in tectonic geomorphology (on the example of western Beskydy Mts); Geographic 1 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran K and Rajendran C P 1995 A report on the December 2, 1994 earthquake; Technical Report, Centre for Earth Science Studies, 34p.

  • Rajendran C P and Rajendran K 1996 Low-moderate seismicity in the vicinity of Palghat Gap, south India and its implications; Curr. Sci. 70 304–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran K, Talwani P and Gupta H K 1992 State of stress field in the Indian subcontinent: A review; Curr. Sci. 62 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran C P, John B, Sreekumari K and Rajendran K 2009 Reassessing the earthquake hazard in Kerala based on historical and current seismicity; J. Geol. Soc. India 73 785–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy S M, Kumanan C J, Selvakumar R and Saravanavel J 2011 Remote sensing revealed drainage anomalies and related tectonics of south India; Tectonophys. 501 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi B K, Chadha R K and Sarma C S P 1995 Investigations of June 7, 1988 earthquake of magnitude 4.5 near Idukki Dam in southern India; PAGEOPH 145 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm S A 1956 Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy; Geol. Soc. Am., New Jersey 67 597–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm S A 2000 Active Tectonics and Alluvial Rivers; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 276p.

  • Singh H N, Raghavan V and Varma A K 1989 Investigation of Idukki earthquake sequence of 7th–8th June 1988 ; J. Geol. Soc. India 34 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha-Roy S and Mathai T 1979 Development of western continental margin of India and plateau uplift as related to geology and tectonics of Kerala; In: Workshop on Status, Problems and Programmes in Indian shield, pp. 235–271.

  • Strahler A N 1951 Physical geography; John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 733p.

  • Strahler A N 1957 Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology; Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 38 91– 920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A N 1964 Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks; In: Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Book Cooperation, New York, pp. 4-39–4-76.

  • Subrahmaniam P 1976 Geotectonic problems of Idamalayar dam site; In: Geology and Geomorphology of Kerala, Geol. Surv. India (Abstract) 34.

  • Subrahmanya K R 1996 Active intraplate deformation in south India; Tectonophys. 262 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittala S, Govindaiah S and Honne G H 2004 Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in the Pavagada area of Tumkur district, south India using remote sensing and GIS techniques; J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing 32 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zámolyi A, Székely B, Draganits E and Timár G 2010 Neotectonic control on river sinuosity at the western margin of the Little Hungarian Plain; Geomorph., doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.028.

  • Zuchiewicz W 1989 Morphotectonic phenomena in the polish flysch Carpathians: A case study of the eastern BeskidNiski Mountains; Questiones Geographicae Spec. Issue 2 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere gratitude to the SERB division of the Department of Science and Technology for funding (SR/S4/ES-434/2009) this study. The investigators thank Dr V Venkateswarlu, Director, NIRM for his encouragement, support and facilities. YS, BJ, GPG thank VIT University for permission to publish this work. Director NCESS is thanked for providing earthquake data of the region. We also thank the reviewers for their critical evaluation and helpful suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biju John.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: N V Chalapathi Rao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, Y., John, B., Ganapathy, G.P. et al. Geomorphic observations from southwestern terminus of Palghat Gap, south India and their tectonic implications. J Earth Syst Sci 125, 821–839 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0695-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0695-9

Keywords

Navigation