Skip to main content
Log in

Vertical structure of atmosphere in pre-monsoon season over Bangalore

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the variation of dry bulb and dew point temperature (T and T d) on the days with and without thunderstorm (TSD and NTSD) over Bangalore during pre-monsoon season. The thermodynamic parameters like convective available potential energy (CAPE), convective inhibition energy (CIN), precipitable water content (PWC) and dynamical parameter vertical wind shear difference (VWS) are studied. The mean profiles of T, T d are generated using March–May upper air data of 1730 hrs IST from 2000–2007 for Bangalore. These are also generated on the TSD and NTSD respectively. It is found that the difference between mean profile of T for TSD/NTSD and seasonal mean is negative/positive till 200 hPa. On the other hand, the difference of the seasonal mean of T d and that of T d on the TSD/NTSD is found to be positive/negative till 300 hPa. These results are found to be significant at 99% confidence. It is found that T is less than the mean at surface till 600 hPa on TSD, whereas it is 0.5 C above average on the NTSD respectively. The difference between the T d on the TSD and mean T d is of the order of 3–5 C till 300 hPa. On the NTSD, this difference ranges between −1 and −2C in the entire troposphere. The mean values of CAPE, CIN, PWC and VWS for Bangalore in pre-monsoon season are found to be 1324, 49.3 J/kg, 30 mm and −0.0007 s −1, respectively. These parameters were used as predictors for forecasting a thunderstorm. The critical success index and Heidke skill score were used for evaluating the forecast skill of the above parameters for 2 years from 2008 to 2009. CAPE and PWC are able to distinguish a TSD from that of a NTSD with 99% confidence. It is found that these scores are 0.44 and 0.35 for CAPE and 0.49 and 0.53 for precipitable water content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnihotri G 2014 Objective forecast of thundery and non-thundery days using conventional indices over Bangalore during pre-monsoon season; Mausam 65 205–214.

  • Agnihotri G, Venugopal R and Hatwar H R 2013 Climatology of thunderstorms and squalls over Bangalore; Mausam 64 735–740.

  • Bhat G S 2002 Near-surface variations and surface fluxes over the northern Bay of Bengal during the 1999 Indian summer monsoon; J. Geophys. Res. 107 (D17) 4336.

  • Brooks H E, Lee J W and Crave J P 2003 The spatial distribution of severe thunderstorm and tornado environments from global reanalysis data; Atmos. Res. 67–68 73–94.

  • Chakrabarti D, Biswas H R, Das G K and Kore P A 2008 Observational aspects and analysis of events of severe thunderstorms during April and May 2006 for Assam and adjoining states – A case study on ‘Pilot Storm Project’; Mausam 59 461–478.

  • Chaudhari H S, Sawaisarje G K, Ranalkar M R and Sen P N 2010 Thunderstorms over a tropical Indian station, Minicoy: Role of vertical wind shear; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 119 (5) 603–615.

  • Colby F P 1984 Convective inhibition as the predictor of convection during AVE SESAME-2; Mon. Wea. Rev. 112 2239–2252.

  • Dalal S, Lohar D, Sarkar S, Sadhukhan I and Debnath G C 2012 Organisational modes of squall type mesoscale convective systems during pre-monsoon season over eastern India; Atmos. Res. 106 120–138.

  • Das S, Mohanty U C, Tyagi A, Sikka D R, Joseph P V, Rathore L S, Habib A, Baidya S, Sonam K and Sarkar A 2014 The SAARC Storm – A coordinated field experiment on severe thunderstorm observations and regional modelling over the South Asian region; Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 95 603–617.

  • Fadnavis F, Deshpande M, Ghude S D and Ernest Raj P 2014 Simulation of severe thunder storm event: A case study over Pune, India; Nat. Hazards 72 927–943.

  • Latha R and Murthy B S 2011 Boundary layer signatures of consecutive thunderstorms as observed by Doppler sodar over western India; Atmos. Res. 99 230–240.

  • Litta A J, Mohanty U C, Das S and Idicula S M 2012 Numerical simulation of severe local storms over east India using WRF–NMM mesoscale model; Atmos. Res. 116 160– 184.

  • Moncrieff M and Miller M J 1976 The dynamics and simulation of tropical cumulonimbus and squall lines; Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 102 373–394.

  • Mukhopadhyay P, Mahakur M and Singh H A K 2009 The interaction of large scale and mesoscale environment leading to formation of intense thunderstorms over Kolkata. Part I: Doppler radar and satellite observations; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 118 441–466.

  • Pennelly C, Reuter G and Flesch T 2014 Verification of the WRF model for simulating heavy precipitation in Alberta; Atmos. Res. 135–136 172–192.

  • Rajeevan M, Kesarkar A, Thampi S B, Rao T N, Radhakrishna B and Rajasekhar M 2010 Sensitivity of WRF cloud microphysics to simulations of a severe thunderstorm event over southeast India; Ann. Geophys. 28 (2) 603–619.

  • Rasmussen E N and Wilhelmson R B 1983 Relationships between storm characteristics and 1200 GMT hodographs, low-level shear, and stability; Preprints, 13th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Tulsa, OK, Am. Meteor. Soc., J5–J8.

  • Singh C, Mohapatra M, Bandyopadhyay B K and Tyagi A 2011 Thunderstorm climatology over northeast and adjoining east India; Mausam 62 163–170.

  • Sinha V and Pradhan D 2006 Supercell storm at Kolkata, India and neighbourhood-analysis of thermodynamic conditions, evolution, structure and movement; Indian J. Radio Space Phys. 35 270–279.

  • Srinivasan V, Ramamurthy K and Nene Y R 1973 Discussion of typical weather situations: Summer Nor’westers and Andhis and large scale convective activity over peninsula and central parts of the country; Forecasting Manual Report III-2.2, India Meteorological Department.

  • Tyagi A 2007 Thunderstorm climatology over Indian region; Mausam 58 (2) 189–212.

  • Tyagi B, Satyanarayana A N V and Vissa N K 2013 Thermodynamical structure of atmosphere during pre- monsoon thunderstorm season over Kharagpur as revealed by STORM data; Pure Appl. Geophys. 170 675–687.

  • Weisman M L and Klemp J B 1982 The dependence of numerically simulated convective 500 storms on vertical shear and buoyancy; Mon. Wea. Rev. 110 504–520.

  • Wilks D S 1995 Statistical Methods in Atmospheric Sciences; Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

  • Yamane Y and Hayashi T 2006 Evaluation of environmental conditions for the formation of severe local storms across the Indian subcontinent; Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 L17806. doi: 10.1029/2006GL026823.

  • Yamane Y, Hayashi T, Dewan A M and Akter F 2010 Severe local convective storms in Bangladesh. Part II: Environmental conditions; Atmos. Res. 95 407– 418.

  • Yamane Y, Hayashi T, Kiguchi M, Mahmmood Fatima A and Mahmmood A D 2012 Synoptic situations of severe local convective storms during the pre-monsoon season in Bangladesh; Int. J. Climatol. 33 (3) 725– 734.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the University of Wyoming for providing the upper air data and derived parameters on their website. The first author is thankful to the Director General of Meteorology, IMD, New Delhi and Deputy Director General of Meteorology, RMC, Chennai for their encouragement and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to GEETA AGNIHOTRI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

AGNIHOTRI, G., DIMRI, A.P. Vertical structure of atmosphere in pre-monsoon season over Bangalore. J Earth Syst Sci 124, 1563–1572 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0612-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0612-7

Keywords

Navigation