Abstract
A completely new set of formulas, based on matrix algebra, has been suggested for the calculation of the CIPW norm for igneous rocks to achieve highly consistent and accurate norms. The suggested sequence of derivation of the normative minerals greatly deviates from the sequence followed in the classical scheme. The formulas are presented in a form convenient for error-free implementation in computer programs. Accurate formulas along with the use of variable molecular weights for CaO and FeO; corrected formula weights for apatite, pyrite and fluorite; and suggested measures to avoid significant rounding off errors to achieve absolute match between the sum of the input weights of the oxides and the sum of the weights of the estimated normative minerals. Using an analogous procedure for determining the oxidation ratios of igneous rocks as used in the SINCLAS system of Verma et al (2002, 2003), the suggested calculation scheme exactly reproduces their results except for apatite for reasons explained in the text, but with a superior match between the totals for about 11,200 analyses representing rocks of a wide range of composition
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal S, Guevara M and Verma S P 2004 Discriminant analysis applied to establish major element field boundaries for tectonic varieties of basic rocks; Int. Geol. Rev. 46 575–594.
Agrawal S, Guevara M and Verma S P 2008 Tectonic discrimination of basic and ultrabasic volcanic rocks through log-transformed ratios of immobile trace elements; Int. Geol. Rev. 50 DOI: 10.2747/0020-6814.50.12.1.
Agrawal S and Verma S P 2007 Comment on “Tectonic classification of basalts with classification trees” by Pieter Vermeesch (2006); Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71 3388–3390.
Aguilar-Y-Vargas V H and Verma S P 1987 Composición química (elementos mayores) de los magmas en el Cinturón Volcánico Mexicano; Geofísica Internacional 26 195–272.
Carmichael I S E, Nicholls J and Smith A L 1970 Silica activity in igneous rocks; American Mineralogist 55 246–263.
Cox K G, Bell J D and Pankhurst R J 1979 The interpretation of igneous rocks; London: Alan and Unwin, 450 pp.
Cross W, Iddings J P, Pirrson L V and Washington H S 1902 A quantitative chemico-mineralogical classification and nomenclature of igneous rocks; J. Geol. 10 555–590.
Hutchison C S 1974 Laboratory Handbook of Petrographic Techniques (New York: John Wiley & Sons) 527 pp.
Johannsen A 1931 A descriptive petrography of the igneous rocks; vol. 1; Chicago University Press, 267 pp.
Kelsey C H 1965 Calculation of the CIPW norm; Mineralogical Magazine 34 276–282.
Le Bas M J, Le Maitre R W, Streckeisen A and Zanettin B 1986 A chemical classification of volcanic rocks on the total alkali-silica diagram; J. Petrol. 27 745–750.
Le Bas M J 1989 Nephelenitic and basanitic rocks; J. Petrol. 30 1299–1312.
Le Bas M J 2000 IUGS classification of the high-Mg and picritic volcanic rocks; J. Petrol. 41 1467–1470.
Le Maitre R W 1976 Some problems of the projection of chemical data into mineralogical classifications; Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 56 181–189.
Le Maitre R W 1982 Numerical petrology: statistical interpretation of geochemical data (Amsterdam: Elsevier) 282 pp.
Middlemost E A K 1989 Iron oxidation ratios, norms and the classification of volcanic rocks; Chemical Geology 77 19–26.
Pal S, López M M, Pérez R J and Terrell D J 1978 Magma characterization of the Mexican Volcanic Belt (Mexico); Bulletin Volcanologique 41 379–389.
Petrelli M, Poli G, Perugini D and Peccerillo A 2005 Petro-Graph: A new software to visualize, model, and present geochemical data in igneous petrology; Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystem 6 Q07011.
Ragland P C 1989 Basic analytical petrology (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 369 pp.
Rollinson H R 1993 Using geochemical data: evaluation, presentation, interpretation (Essex: Longman) 352 pp.
Verma S P 2000 Geochemistry of the subducting Cocos plate and the origin of subduction-unrelated mafic magmas at the volcanic front of the central part of the Mexican Volcanic Belt; In: Geological Society of America Special Paper on Cenozoic Tectonics and Volcanism of Mexico, Delgado-Granados H, Aguirre-Díaz G and Stock J M (eds) No. 334, Chapter 13, 195–222.
Verma S P 2002 Absence of Cocos plate subduction-related basic volcanism in southern Mexico: A unique case on Earth?; Geology 30 1095–1098.
Verma S P 2004 Solely extension-related origin of the eastern to west-central Mexican Volcanic Belt (Mexico) from partial melting inversion model; Curr. Sci. 86 713–719.
Verma S P 2006 Extension-related origin of magmas from a garnet-bearing source in the Los Tuxtlas volcanic field, Mexico; Int. J. Earth Sci. (Geologische Rundschau) 95 871–901.
Verma S P, Guevara M and Agrawal S 2006 Discriminating four tectonic settings: Five new geochemical diagrams for basic and ultrabasic volcanic rocks based on log-ratio transformation of major-element data; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 115 485–528.
Verma S P, Torres-Alvarado I S and Sotelo-Rodríguez Z T 2002 SINCLAS: Standard igneous norm and volcanic rock classification system; Computers & Geosciences 28 711–715.
Verma S P, Torres-Alvarado I S and Velasco-Tapia F T 2003 A revised CIPW norm; Schweizerische Mineralogische und Petrographische Mitteilungen 83 197–216.
Vocke Jr R D 1999 IUPAC Commission on Atomic Weights and Isotopic Abundances — Atomic Weights of the Elements 1997; Pure Appl. Chemistry 71 1593–1607.
Washington H S 1917 Chemical analyses of igneous rocks; US Geological Survey Professional Paper 99.
Zhou J and Li X 2006 GeoPlot: An excel VBA program for geochemical data plotting; Computers & Geosciences 32 554–560.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pruseth, K.L. Calculation of the CIPW norm: New formulas. J Earth Syst Sci 118, 101–113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-009-0010-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-009-0010-0