Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Benefit of Bevacizumab-Based Frontline Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): a Turkish Oncology Group Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Several chemotherapy regimens using bevacizumab have been developed. Our goal was to investigate regimens that have demonstrated significant clinical activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Materials and Methods

Six hundred and sixty six patients with mCRC who received first-line chemotherapy combination with bevacizumab were studied. Fluoropyrimidine (F) plus irinotecan (I)-based (FI-bev), F plus oxaliplatin (O)-based (FO-bev), and F-based (F-bev) treatment regimens were compared with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

The median PFS of FI-bev (n = 414) was 10.9 months (95 % CI 10–11.8), of FO-bev (n = 211) was 9.4 months (95 % CI 8.3–10.4), and of F-bev (n = 41) was 9.5 months (95 % CI 5.9–13.1) (p = 0.089). The median OS of FI-bev was 26.3 months (95 % CI 21.7–30.9), of FO-bev was 27 months (95 % CI 24.3–29.7), and of F-bev was 23.3 months (95 % CI 12.7–33.9) (p = 0.102). In KRAS wild-type patients, the median PFS of FI-bev group was significantly longer than FO-bev group (10.5 vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.006). The FI-bev group had better OS than FO-bev group with borderline significance (p = 0.058). The FI-bev group had significantly longer OS than F-bev group. Patients who underwent metastasectomy or those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) ≤1 had longer PFS and OS independent of the type of chemotherapy regimen.

Conclusion

FI-bev may be the preferred frontline regimen for patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC. Metastasectomy and performance score were the strongest positive predictors of OS and PFS regardless of backbone chemotherapy regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram II, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer [Internet]. 2014;136:E359–86. [cited 2014 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25220842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, et al. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol [Internet]. 2012;23:2479–516. [cited 2015 Jul 12]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23012255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rolfo C, Bronte G, Sortino G, Papadimitriou K, Passiglia F, Fiorentino E, et al. The role of targeted therapy for gastrointestinal tumors. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2014;8:875–85. [cited 2015 Sep 11]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24957206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrara N, Gerber H-P, LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med [Internet]. 2003;9:669–76. [cited 2014 Dec 29]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12778165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hurwitz HI, Tebbutt NC, Kabbinavar F, Giantonio BJ, Guan Z-Z, Mitchell L, et al. Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis from seven randomized controlled trials. Oncologist [Internet]. 2013;18:1004–12. [cited 2015 Aug 5]. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3780632&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Cutsem E, Prenen H, D’Haens G, Bennouna J, Carrato A, Ducreux M, et al. A phase I/II, open-label, randomised study of nintedanib plus mFOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Ann Oncol [Internet]. 2015. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv286. [cited 2015 Sep 12]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26272806.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yalcin S, Uslu R, Dane F, Yilmaz U, Zengin N, Buyukunal E, et al. Bevacizumab + capecitabine as maintenance therapy after initial bevacizumab + XELOX treatment in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: phase III “Stop and Go” study results—a Turkish Oncology Group Trial. Oncology [Internet]. 2013;85:328–35. [cited 2015 Sep 12]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24247559.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, Lupi C, Sensi E, Lonardi S, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2015 Sep 12]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26338525.

  9. Kocakova I, Melichar B, Kocak I, Bortlicek Z, Büchler T, Dusek L, et al. Bevacizumab with FOLFIRI or XELIRI in the first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal carcinoma: results from Czech observational registry. Anticancer Res [Internet]. 2015;35:3455–61. [cited 2015 Sep 12]. . Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia-Alfonso P, Chaves M, Muñoz A, Salud A, García-Gonzalez M, Grávalos C, et al. Capecitabine and irinotecan with bevacizumab 2-weekly for metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase II AVAXIRI study. BMC Cancer [Internet]. 2015;15:327. [cited 2015 Sep 12]. . Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4423590&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Simkens LHJ, van Tinteren H, May A, ten Tije AJ, Creemers G-JM, Loosveld OJL, et al. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet (London, England) [Internet]. 2015;385:1843–52. [cited 2015 Sep 12]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25862517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Puthillath A, Mashtare T, Wilding G, Khushalani N, Steinbrenner L, Ross ME, et al. A phase II study of first-line biweekly capecitabine and bevacizumab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol [Internet]. 2009;71:242–8. [cited 2015 Sep 12]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19081732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kabbinavar FF, Hurwitz HI, Yi J, Sarkar S, Rosen O. Addition of bevacizumab to fluorouracil-based first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of cohorts of older patients from two randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2009;27:199–205. [cited 2015 Sep 12]. Available from: http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/2/199.long.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Saltz LB, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E, Scheithauer W, Figer A, Wong R, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2008;26:2013–9. [cited 2014 Oct 10]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18421054.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Mitchell E, Wierzbicki R, Ganju V, Jeffery M, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC-C Study. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2007;25:4779–86. [cited 2015 Aug 19]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17947725.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hochster HS, Hart LL, Ramanathan RK, Childs BH, Hainsworth JD, Cohn AL, et al. Safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine regimens with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the TREE Study. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2008;26:3523–9. [cited 2016 Jan 16]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18640933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cunningham D, Lang I, Marcuello E, Lorusso V, Ocvirk J, Shin DB, et al. Bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (AVEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2013;14:1077–85. [cited 2015 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028813.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Temraz S, Mukherji D, Shamseddine A. Sequencing of treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: where to fit the target. World J Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2014;20:1993–2004. [cited 2015 Sep 13]. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3934469&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Colucci G, Gebbia V, Paoletti G, Giuliani F, Caruso M, Gebbia N, et al. Phase III randomized trial of FOLFIRI versus FOLFOX4 in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter study of the Gruppo Oncologico Dell’Italia Meridionale. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2005;23:4866–75. [cited 2015 Sep 13]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15939922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, Pfanner E, Allegrini G, Barbara C, et al. Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nor. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2007;25:1670–6. [cited 2015 Sep 13]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17470860.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Masi G, Vasile E, Loupakis F, Cupini S, Fornaro L, Baldi G, et al. Randomized trial of two induction chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: an updated analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst [Internet]. 2011;103:21–30. [cited 2015 Sep 13]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21123833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, Navarro M, James RD, Karasek P, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet (London, England) [Internet]. 2000;355:1041–7. [cited 2015 Jul 25]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10744089.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Giacchetti S, Perpoint B, Zidani R, Le Bail N, Faggiuolo R, Focan C, et al. Phase III multicenter randomized trial of oxaliplatin added to chronomodulated fluorouracil-leucovorin as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2000;18:136–47. [cited 2015 Aug 15]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10623704.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grothey A, Sargent D. Overall survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer correlates with availability of fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin regardless of whether doublet or single-agent therapy is used first line. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2005;23:9441–2. [cited 2015 Sep 13]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16361649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Al-Batran S-E, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2014;15:1065–75. [cited 2015 Sep 14]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25088940.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz H-J, Innocenti F, Mahoney MR, O’Neil BH, et al. CALGB/SWOG 80405: phase III trial of irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) with bevacizumab (BV) or cetuximab (CET) for patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (wt) untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or re. ASCO Meet. Abstr. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2014;32:LBA3. [cited 2015 Sep 14]. Available from: http://hwmaint.meeting.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/32/15_suppl/LBA3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Díaz-Rubio E, Gómez-España A, Massutí B, Sastre J, Abad A, Valladares M, et al. First-line XELOX plus bevacizumab followed by XELOX plus bevacizumab or single-agent bevacizumab as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase III MACRO TTD study. Oncologist [Internet]. 2012;17:15–25. [cited 2015 Sep 14]. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3267817&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Buchler T, Pavlik T, Melichar B, Bortlicek Z, Usiakova Z, Dusek L, et al. Bevacizumab with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin versus bevacizumab with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal carcinoma: results of a large registry-based cohort analysis. BMC Cancer [Internet]. 2014;14:323. [cited 2015 Sep 14]. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4018966&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kozloff M, Yood MU, Berlin J, Flynn PJ, Kabbinavar FF, Purdie DM, et al. Clinical outcomes associated with bevacizumab-containing treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the BRiTE observational cohort study. Oncologist [Internet]. 2009;14:862–70. [cited 2015 Sep 15]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19726453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kabbinavar FF, Schulz J, McCleod M, Patel T, Hamm JT, Hecht JR, et al. Addition of bevacizumab to bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2005;23:3697–705. [cited 2015 Aug 29]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15738537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kabbinavar F, Hurwitz HI, Fehrenbacher L, Meropol NJ, Novotny WF, Lieberman G, et al. Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2003;21:60–5. [cited 2015 Aug 25]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12506171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2004;350:2335–42. [cited 2015 Jun 7]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15175435.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Philip A. Philip, MD, of Karmanos Cancer Center, for the helpful discussion during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Artaç.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by the ethics committee at Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram Faculty of Medicine and carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all applicable regulations.

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors has any potential financial conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Artaç, M., Coşkun, H.Ş., Dane, F. et al. Benefit of Bevacizumab-Based Frontline Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): a Turkish Oncology Group Study. J Gastrointest Canc 47, 264–272 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-016-9823-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-016-9823-7

Keywords

Navigation