Skip to main content
Log in

Authors’ Reply: Confounding by Indication in Retrospective Studies of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Antiepileptic Treatment and Mortality

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ernster VL. Trends in smoking, cancer risk, and cigarette promotion. Current priorities for reducing tobacco exposure. Cancer. 1988;62:1702–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Giovino GA, Henningfield JE, Tomar SL, Escobedo LG, Slade J. Epidemiology of tobacco use and dependence. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17:48–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Broderick JP, Brott TG, Grotta JC. Intracerebral hemorrhage volume measurement. Stroke. 1994;25:1081.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, Tomsick T, Huster G. Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage. A powerful and easy-to-use predictor of 30-day mortality. Stroke. 1993;24:987–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Rosand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Battey, T.W.K., Falcone, G.J., Sheth, K.N. et al. Authors’ Reply: Confounding by Indication in Retrospective Studies of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Antiepileptic Treatment and Mortality. Neurocrit Care 18, 287–288 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-013-9820-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-013-9820-7

Keywords

Navigation