Skip to main content
Log in

A Rule to Identify Patients Who Require Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A study performed in Hong Kong of catheter angiography after ICH found a high rate of structural lesions in patients 45 years of age or younger, without a history of hypertension, or with lobar hemorrhage. We hypothesized that a clinical decision rule based on these Hong Kong criteria would reliably identify patients who require MRI after ICH.

Methods

We identified all patients admitted with ICH to our medical center during a 5-year period who underwent brain MRI. Patients were excluded if the history revealed an obvious cause of ICH. Two study neurologists independently adjudicated whether MRI revealed the cause of ICH. We devised a rule recommending MRI if patients met one or more Hong Kong criteria, and calculated the proportion of patients with diagnostic MRI studies who would have been identified by this rule. We also examined the performance of a modified rule using age ≤ 55 years.

Results

The original Hong Kong rule applied to 102 of the 148 patients in our cohort (69%), and would have recommended MRI in 25 of 27 patients with diagnostic MRI studies (93%, 95% CI 76–99%). The modified rule applied to 110 patients (74%), and would have recommended MRI in all 27 patients with diagnostic MRI studies (100%, 95% CI 91–100%).

Conclusions

A rule based on simple clinical criteria may be useful for stratifying the yield of MRI after ICH. If validated in further studies, such a rule could reduce the number of unnecessary MRI studies after ICH, leading to more cost-effective care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fang J, Alderman MH, Keenan NL, Croft JB. Declining US stroke hospitalization since 1997: National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1988–2004. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29:243–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Counsell C, Boonyakarnkul S, Dennis M, et al. Primary intracerebral haemorrhage in the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project, 2. Prognosis. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1995;5:26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Broderick JP, Adams HP, Barsan W Jr, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 1999;30:905–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu XL, Chan MS, Poon WS. Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage: which patients need diagnostic cerebral angiography? A prospective study of 206 cases and review of the literature. Stroke. 1997;28:1406–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wakai S, Kumakura N, Nagai M. Lobar intracerebral hemorrhage. A clinical, radiographic, and pathological study of 29 consecutive operated cases with negative angiography. J Neurosurg. 1992;76:231–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1997;349:1569–81.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cosgrove GR, Leblanc R, Meagher-Villemure K, Ethier R. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Neurology. 1985;35:625–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgenstern LB, Hemphill JC III, Anderson C, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2010;41:2108–29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wijman CA, Venkatasubramanian C, Bruins S, Fischbein N, Schwartz N. Utility of early MRI in the diagnosis and management of acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;30:456–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dylewski DA, Demchuk AM, Morgenstern LB. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neuroimaging. 2000;10:78–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Singer OC, Sitzer M, de Rochemont R, Neumann-Haefelin T. Practical limitations of acute stroke MRI due to patient-related problems. Neurology. 2004;62:1848–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke JL, Johnston SC, Farrant M, Bernstein R, Tong D, Hemphill JC III. External validation of the ICH score. Neurocrit Care. 2004;1:53–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zahuranec DB, Gonzales NR, Brown DL, et al. Presentation of intracerebral haemorrhage in a community. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2006;77:340–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cordonnier C, Klijn CJ, van Beijnum J, Al-Shahi Salman R. Radiological investigation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: systematic review and trinational survey. Stroke. 2010;41:685–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was funded by the Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hooman Kamel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamel, H., Navi, B.B. & Hemphill, J.C. A Rule to Identify Patients Who Require Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 18, 59–63 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9607-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9607-7

Keywords

Navigation