Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Successful Enteral Nutritional Support in the Neurocritical Care Unit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Adequate caloric intake is associated with improved outcome in neurocritical illness, but factors influencing the provision of enteral nutrition (EN) have not been systematically evaluated. The primary goal of the study was to determine the EN intake of neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients within the first week of illness and investigate the factors contributing to achieving caloric goals.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of adult patients admitted to the neurosurgery service (NS) during August 2005–August 2006 were randomly selected and stratified into three groups based on their ICU-admission Glasgow Coma Scale Score (GCS) (GCS > 11, GCS 8–11, GCS 4–7). Daily EN intake, GCS, and other clinical data were collected.

Results

A total of 71 patients were included (GCS > 11 = 23, GCS 8–11 = 23, GCS 4–7 = 25). Admitting diagnoses included traumatic brain injury (TBI) (32%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (32%), and intracerebral hemorrhage (17%). The overall in-hospital mortality was 23.9%. Overall, the maximum daily mean calories provided was 1,100 kcal (mean of 55% of caloric goal on hospital day 6). The median time to feeding was approximately 3 days in each group. GCS did not appear to significantly affect the mean % of caloric goal administered in patients with a minimum daily GCS ≤ 11 (P = 0.053). Multivariate analysis revealed that clinical care factors, such as time to EN orders and enteral access confirmation, were significant impediments to EN provision (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

System-based clinical care factors appear to have great impact on the successful provision of EN in the first week of neurocritical illness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young B, Ott L, Yingling B, McClain C. Nutrition and brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9(1):S375–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Young B, Ott L, Twyman D, et al. The effect of nutritional support on outcome from severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 1987;67:668–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grahm TW, Zadrozny DB, Harrington T. The benefits of early jejunal hyperalimentation in the head-injured patient. Neurosurgery. 1989;25(5):729–35. doi:10.1097/00006123-198911000-00007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor SJ, Fettes SB, Jewkes C, Nelson RJ. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial to determine the effect of early enhanced enteral nutrition on clinical outcome in mechanically ventilated patients suffering head injury. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(11):2525–31. doi:10.1097/00003246-199911000-00033.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:1655–711. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.181486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McCormic PC. Nutritional support after spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2002;50(Suppl 3):S81–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ASPEN Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(S1):1–138. doi:10.1177/014860710202600101.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brain Trauma Foundation. Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17(6–7):457–627.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Winter TA, Bernard A, Magnuson B, Hoskins L, Nave B, Swintosky M. University of Kentucky adult nutrition support handbook. 2006. URL: http://www.hospukyedu/pharmacy/nss/NSS-manualhtml.

  10. Brain Trauma Foundation. Management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:S1–95. doi:10.1089/neu.2006.0209.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McClave SA, Sexton LK, Spain DA, et al. Enteral tube feeding in the intensive care unit: factors impeding adequate delivery. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(7):1252–6. doi:10.1097/00003246-199907000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heyl D, Cook DJ, Winder B, Brylowski L, Van deMark H, Guyatt G. Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a prospective survey. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(6):1055–60. doi:10.1097/00003246-199506000-00010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rapp RP, Young B, Twyman D, et al. The favorable effect of early parenteral feeding on survival in head-injured patients. J Neurosurg. 1983;58:906–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Borzotta AP, Pennings J, Papsadero B, et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after severe closed head injury. J Trauma. 1994;37(3):459–68. doi:10.1097/00005373-199409000-00022.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Braunschweig CL, Levy P, Sheean PM, Wang X. Enteral compared with parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74:534–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Spain DA, McClave SAS, Leslie K, Adams JL, et al. Infusion protocol improves delivery of enteral tube feeding in the critical care unit. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1999;23(5):288–92. doi:10.1177/0148607199023005288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron M. Cook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zarbock, S.D., Steinke, D., Hatton, J. et al. Successful Enteral Nutritional Support in the Neurocritical Care Unit. Neurocrit Care 9, 210–216 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-008-9120-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-008-9120-9

Keywords

Navigation