Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical questions in the age of the new eugenics

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a result of the publicly funded Human Genome Project (HGP), and an increasing number of private enterprises, a new form of eugenic theory and practice has emerged, differing from previous manifestations. Genetic testing has become a consumer service that may now be purchased at greatly reduced cost. While the old eugenics was pseudoscientific, the new eugenics is firmly based on DNA research. While the old eugenics focused on societal measures against the individual, the new eugenics emphasizes the family as a control agent. Eugenics is now voluntary, with the promise of abortion for those afraid of producing genetically damaged children. The ethical concepts of beneficence, avoidance of maleficence, autonomy, and equity are discussed in terms of aspects of the HGP. One major issue is the need for an ethical system available to health consumers that will empower them and assist in their biogenic decisions.

“The concentration on the genes implicated in cancer is only a special case of a general genomania (emphasis added) that surfaces in ... the weekly announcements in The New York Times of the location of yet another gene for another disease. The revealing rhetoric of this publicity is always the same; only the blanks need to be filled in: ‘It was announced today by scientists at [Harvard, Vanderbilt, Stanford] Medical School that a gene responsible for [some, many, a common form of] [schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s, arteriosclerosis, prostate cancer] has been located and its DNA sequence determined. This exciting research, say scientists, is the first step in what may eventually turn out to be a possible cure for this disease.’”

Lewontin 1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lewontin, R. (1997, January 9) “Billions and billions of demons”, The New York Review of Books, pp. 28–31.

  2. Beardsley, T. (1996, March) Vital data. Scientific American, pp. 100–105.

  3. Cook-Deegan, R.M. (1994) The gene wars: Science, politics, and the human genome, W. W. Norton & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, N.G. (ed.) (1994) The Human Genome Project: Deciphering the blueprint of heredity, University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cranor, C.F. (ed.) (1994) Are genes us?: The social consequences of the new genetics, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, T.F. (1991) The Human Genome Project: Cracking the genetic code of life, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levi, T. (1992) A very human adventure: The story and implications of the Human Genome Project, Synchron Associates, England.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loder, B. (1995) The global human genome programme, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilkie, T. (1994) Perilous knowledge: The Human Genome Project and its implications, The University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robot speeds up mapping of DNA: Scientists predict blueprint by 2001 (1995, December 23), The Globe and Mail, pp. A1, A11.

  11. Marshall, E. & Pennisi, E. (1996) The Human Genome Project: NIH launches the final push to sequence the genome, Science 272: 188–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wiesenthal, D.L. & Wiener, N.I. (1997) Privacy and the Human Genome Project, Ethics and Behavior 6: 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Public Broadcast System (1998) The basics of genetic testing: A question of genes—Inherited Risks. [on-line] http://www.pbs.org/gene/findout3_/.html.

  14. Kevles, D. (1986) In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the use of human heredity, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ludmerer, K. M. (1972) Genetics and American society: A historical appraisal, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tucker, W.H. (1994) The science and politics of racial research, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ross, C. (1996) Birth of a notion, The Next City 1: 28–32-, 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Proctor, R. (1988) Racial hygiene: Medicine under the Nazi, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kitcher, P. (1996). Lives to come: The genetic revolution and human possibilities, Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paul, D. (1994) Eugenic anxieties, social realities, and political choices, in: Cranor, C.F. (ed.), Are genes us?: The social consequences of the new genetics, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Larson, E.J. (1995) Sex, race and science: Eugenics in the Deep South, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reilly, P.R. (1991) The surgical solution: A history of involuntary sterilization in the United States, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Searle, G.R. (1976) Eugenics and politics in Britain, 1900–1914, Noordhoff International Publishers, Leyden.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smaglik, P. (1998, June 8) Privatizing the human genome?, The Scientist 12: 1–6, Electronic version, (http://www.the-scientist.library.upenn.edu/yr1998/june/smaglik_p1_980608.html).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Beauchamp, T. L. & Childress, J. F. (1983) Principles of biomedical ethics, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jones, D. (1997, June 15) Betsy Lewthaite’s genetic odyssey, The Globe and Mail, p. D5.

  27. Immen, W. (1996, May 7) Experts back genetic testing for cancer, The Globe and Mail, p. A9.

  28. Marshall, E. (1996a) Genome researchers take the pledge, Science 272: 477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marshall, E. (1996b) Rifkin’s latest target: Genetic testing, Science 272: 1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kolata, G. (1993, December 7) Nightmare or the dream of a new era in genetics, The New York Times, pp. A1, B10.

  31. Behavior geneticists shun colleague (1995) Science 270: 1125.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kakva, G.S. (1994) Upside risks: Social consequences of beneficial biotechnology, in: Cranor, C.F. (ed.), Are genes us?: The social consequences of the new genetics, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wright, R. (1990, July 9) Achilles helix, New Republic, pp. 21–31.

  34. Dyson, F. (1997, April 10) Can science be ethical, The New York Review of Books, pp. 46–48.

  35. Dunn, K. (1996, December 21) A troubling cure ‘for hereditary disease, The Globe and Mail, p. D6.

  36. McGee, G. (1997) Where human life happens. The Pennsylvania Gazette, June, Electronic edition, (http://www.upenn.edu/gazette/0697/babies.html).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Wiesenthal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiener, N.I., Wiesenthal, D.L. Ethical questions in the age of the new eugenics. SCI ENG ETHICS 5, 383–394 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0029-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0029-2

Keywords

Navigation