Barnett, J., Cooper, H., & Senior, V. (2007). Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science. Risk Analysis,
Beecher, H. K. (1966). Ethics and clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine,
Berger, R. L. (1990). Nazi science—the Dachau hypothermia experiments. New England Journal of Medicine,
Brandt, A. M. (1978). Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee syphilis study. The Hastings Center Report,
Brown, N. (2003). Hope against hype—accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies,
Bubela, T. M., & Caulfield, T. (2004). Do the print media “hype” genetics research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers. Canadian Medical Association Journal,
Bubela, T. M., & Caulfield, T. (2010). Role and reality: Technology transfer at Canadian universities. Trends in Biotechnology,
Bubela, T., Nisbet, M. C., Borchelt, R., Brunger, F., Critchley, C., Einsiedel, E., et al. (2009). Science communication reconsidered. Nature Biotechnology,
Carlson, E. F. (2006). Times of triumph, times of doubt: Science and the battle of public trust. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Caulfield, T. (2005). Popular media, biotechnology, and the ‘cycle of hype’. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy,
Caulfield, T. (2010). Stem cell research and economic promises. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics,
Caulfield, T., Rachul, C., & Zarzeczny, A. (2010). ‘Neurohype’ and the name game: Who’s to blame. AJOB Neuroscience,
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Conrad, P. (1999). Use of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science,
Conrad, P. (2001). Genetic optimism: Framing genes and mental illness in the news. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry,
Corbie-Smith, G., Thomas, S. B., Williams, M. V., & Moody-Ayers, S. (1999). Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. Journal of General Internal Medicine,
Critchley, C. R. (2008). Public opinion and trust in scientists: The role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers. Public Understanding of Science,
Cunningham-Burley, S. (2006). Public knowledge and public trust. Community Genetics,
Doerflinger, R. M. (2008). The problem of deception in embryonic stem cell research. Cell Proliferation,
41(Suppl 1), 65–70.
Downey, R., & Geransar, R. (2008). Stem cell research, publics’ and stakeholder views. Health Law Review,
Dresser, R. (2001). When science offers salvation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dresser, R. (2010). Stem cell research as innovation: Expanding the ethical and policy conversation. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics,
Durant, J. R., Evans, G. A., & Thomas, G. P. (1989). The public understanding of science. Nature,
Eiser, J. R., Stafford, T., Henneberry, J., & Catney, P. (2009). ‘Trust me, I’m a scientist (not a developer)’: Perceived expertise and motives as predictors of trust in assessment of risk from contaminated land. Risk Analysis,
Enserink, M. (1999). Ag biotech moves to mollify its critics. Science,
Evans, G., & Durant, T. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science,
Evans, J. P., Meslin, E. M., Marteau, T. M., & Caulfield, T. (2011). Deflating the genomics bubble. Science,
Freimuth, V. S., Quinn, S. C., Thomas, S. B., Cole, G., Zook, E., & Duncan, T. (2001). African Americans’ views on research and the Tuskegee syphilis study. Social Science and Medicine,
Gottweis, H. (2002). Gene therapy and the public: A matter of trust. Gene Therapy,
Illes, J., Moser, M. A., McCormick, M. B., Racine, E., Blakeslee, S., Caplan, A., et al. (2010). Neurotalk: Improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience,
Katz, J. with Capron, A. M., & Glass, E. S. (2003). The Jewish chronic disease hospital case. In E. Emanuel, R. A. Crouch, J. D. Arras, J. D. Moreno & C. Grady (Eds.) Ethical and regulatory aspects of clinical research. Readings and commentary (pp. 11–15). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jones, N. L. (2007). A code of ethics for the life sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics,
Kakuk, P. (2009). The legacy of the Hwang case: Research misconduct in the biosciences. Science and Engineering Ethics,
Kimmelman, J. (2010). Gene transfer and the ethics of first-in-human research. Lost in translation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kitzinger, J., & Williams, C. (2005). Forecasting science futures: Legitimising hope and calming fears in the embryo stem cell debate. Social Science and Medicine,
Knowles, L. P. (2009). Stem cell hype and the dangers of stem cell ‘tourism’. Ethics White Paper for the Stem Cell Network. http://www.stemcellnetwork.ca/uploads/File/whitepapers/Stem-Cell-Hype.pdf
. Accessed February 20, 2011.
Kohn, D. B., Sadelain, M., & Glorioso, J. C. (2003). Occurrence of leukaemia following gene therapy for X-linked SCID. Nature Reviews Cancer,
Krimsky, S. (2003). Science in the private interest. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Liu, S. V. (2009). Fast protest against a fast hype on iPS cells. Top Watch,
Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science,
Master, Z., & Ozdemir, V. (2008). Selling translational research: Is science a value-neutral autonomous enterprise? American Journal of Bioethics,
Master, Z, & Resnik, D. B. (2011). Stem-cell tourism and scientific responsibility. EMBO Reports,
Mello, M. M., & Wolf, L. E. (2010). The Havasupai Indian tribe case—lessons for research involving stored biologic samples. New England Journal of Medicine,
Mooney, C. (2010). Do scientists understand the public?. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Murphy, E. R., Illes, J., & Reiner, P. B. (2008). Neuroethics of neuromarketing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour,
Nature. (2006). Nature milestones cancer (Milestones Timeline). Nature,
. Accessed March 6, 2011.
Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science (revised edition). New York, NY: WH Freeman.
Nisbet, M. (2004). Explaining majority support for stem cell research. Skeptical Inquirer
. Accessed February 12, 2011.
Nisbet, M. C., & Goidel, R. K. (2007). Understanding citizen perception of science controversy: Bridging the ethnographic-survey research divide. Public Understanding of Science,
Nisbet, M. C., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Biotechnology and the American Media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication,
Ogbogu, U. (2006). A review of pressing ethical issues relevant to stem cell translational research. Health Law Review,
Peddie, V. L., Porter, M., Counsell, C., Caie, L., Pearson, D., & Bhattacharya, S. (2009). ’Not taken in by media hype’: How potential donors, recipients and members of the general public perceive stem cell research. Human Reproduction,
Petersen, A. (2001). Biofantasies: Genetics and medicine in the print news media. Social Science and Medicine,
Petersen, A. (2002). Replicating our bodies, losing our selves: News media portrayals of human cloning in wake of Dolly. Body and Society,
Petersen, A. (2009). The ethics of expectations: Biobanks and the promise of personalized medicine. Monash Bioethics Reviews, 28(1), 05.1–05.12.
Priest, S. H. (2001). Misplaced faith: Communication variables as predictors of encouragement for biotechnology development. Science Communication,
Priest, S. H., Bonfadelli, H., & Rusanen, M. (2003). The ‘trust gap’ hypothesis: Predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors. Risk Analysis,
Resnik, D. B. (1998). The ethics of science: An introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
Resnik, D. B. (2011). Scientific research and the public trust. Science and Engineering Ethics,
Ryan, K. A., Sanders, A. M., Wang, D. D., & Levine, A. D. (2010). Tracking the rise of stem cell tourism. Regenerative Medicine,
Schrage, M. (2004). Great expectations. Technology Review,
Shamoo, A. S., & Resnik, D. B. (2009). Responsible conduct of research
(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis,
Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis,
Somia, N., & Verma, I. M. (2000). Gene therapy: Trials and tribulations. Nature Reviews Genetics,
Steel, M. (2005). Molecular medicine: Promises, promises? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,
Tang, J. T., & Hallman, W. K. (2005). Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States. Risk Analysis,
The Oxford American Dictionary of Current English. (1999). “hype” Oxford University Press.
Thomas, G., & Durant, J. (1987). Why should we promote the public understanding of science? Science Literacy Papers
, 1–14. http://www.core.org.cn/NR/rdonlyres/Science–Technology–and-Society/STS-014Spring-2006/2737FE74-34D6-4A16-A7DD-95F0FBE60BA0/0/durant_promote.pdf
. Accessed May 14, 2011.
Turney, J. (1996). Public understanding of science. The Lancet,
Tyson, P. (2000). ‘The Experiments’ in results of death-camp experiments: Should they be used? NOVA online (Holocaust on Trial). http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/holocaust/experiside.html
. Accessed March 5, 2011.
Wellcome Trust (1998). Public perspectives on human cloning.
. Accessed February 21, 2011.
Wellcome Trust (2005). Information and attitudes: Consulting the public about biomedical science
. Accessed February 21, 2011.
Whitbeck, C. (1995). Truth and trustworthiness in research. Science and Engineering Ethics,
Williams-Jones, B. (2004). A spoonful of trust helps nanotech go down. Health Law Review,
Williams-Jones, B., & Corrigan, O. P. (2003). Rhetoric and hype: Where’s the ‘ethics’ in pharmacogenomics. American Journal of Pharmacogenomics,
Wilson, J. M. (2009). A history lesson for stem cells. Science,
Yarborough, M., & Sharp, R. R. (2009). Public trust and research a decade later: What have we learned since Jesse Gelsinger’s death? Molecular Genetics and Metabolism,
Zarzeczny, A., & Caulfield, T. (2010). Stem cell tourism and doctors’ duties to minors—a view from Canada. American Journal of Bioethics,
Ziman, J. (1991). Public understanding of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values,