Skip to main content
Log in

Engagement Agents in the Making: On the Front Lines of Socio-Technical Integration

Commentary on: “Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies”

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This commentary builds on Haico te Kulve and Arie Rip’s (2011) notion of “engagement agents,” individuals that must be able to move between multiple dimensions, or “levels” of research, innovation, and policy processes. The commentary compares and contrasts the role of the engagement agent within the Constructive Technology Assessment and integration approaches, and suggests that on-site integration research represents one way to transform both social and natural scientists into competent and informed “engagement agents,” a new generation of researchers that possess the knowledge and capacities to forge “novel linkages” between the oftentimes disparate terrains of science, politics, and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C., & Guston, D. H. (2008). Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: Foresight, engagement, and integration. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science, technology studies (Third Edition ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H., Evans, R., Ribeiro, R., & Hall, M. (2006). Experiments with Interactional Expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, 656–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E. (2007). Ethnographic invention: Probing the capacity of laboratory decisions. NanoEthics, 1(2), 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E., & Miller, C. A. (2009). Contextualizing the engineering laboratory. In S. H. Christensen, M. Meganck, & B. Delahousse (Eds.), Engineering in context (pp. 369–381). Palo Alto, CA: Academica Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E., Mahajan, R. L., & Mitcham, C. (2006). Midstream modulation of technology: Governance from within. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(6), 485–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, D. H. (2008). Innovation policy: Not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature, 454(7207), 940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2011). Constitutional moments in governing science and technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17 (this issue).

  • Rip, A., & te Kulve, H. (2008). Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Scenarios. The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Volume 1: Presenting Futures (pp. 49–70). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurbiers, D. (2011). What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17 (this issue).

  • Schot, J., & Rip, A. (1997). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54(23), 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuurbiers, D., & Fisher, E. (2009). Lab-scale intervention. EMBO Reports, 10(5), 424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STIR: SocioTechnical Integration Research. http://cns.asu.edu/stir/.

  • Te Kulve, H., & Rip, A. (2011). Constructing productive engagement: Pre-engagement tools for emerging technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17 (this issue).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shannon N. Conley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conley, S.N. Engagement Agents in the Making: On the Front Lines of Socio-Technical Integration. Sci Eng Ethics 17, 715–721 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9323-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9323-x

Keywords

Navigation