Participating Despite Questions: Toward a More Confident Participatory Technology Assessment
- David H. Guston
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
While the important challenges of public deliberations on emerging technologies are crucial to keep in mind, this paper argues that scholars and practitioners have reason to be more confident in their performance of participatory technology assessments (pTA). Drawing on evidence from the 2008 National Citizens’ Technology Forum (NCTF) conducted by the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University, this paper describes how pTA offers a combination of intensive and extensive qualities that are unique among modes of engagement. In the NCTF, this combination led to significant learning and opinion changes, based on what can be characterized as a high-quality deliberation. The quality of the anticipatory knowledge required to address emerging technologies is always contested, but pTAs can be designed with outcomes in mind—especially when learning is understood as an outcome.
- Brown, M (2006) Citizens’ panels and the concept of representation. The Journal of Political Philosophy 14: pp. 203-225 CrossRef
- Cobb, MD (2011) Creating informed public opinion: Citizen deliberation about nanotechnologies for human enhancements. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13: pp. 1533-1548 CrossRef
- Guston, DH (1999) Evaluating the first US consensus conference: The impact of the citizens’ panel on telecommunications and the future of democracy. Science, Technology and Human Values 24: pp. 451-482 CrossRef
- Hamlett, P., Cobb, M., & Guston, D.H. (2008). National citizens’ technology forum: Nanotechnologies and human enhancement. CNS-ASU report #R08-0003. Tempe, AZ: Center for nanotechnology in society as Arizona State University. Available at http://www.cns.asu.edu/cns-library/type/#report.
- Philbrick, M, Barandiaran, J (2009) The national citizens’ technology forum: Lessons for the future. Science and Public Policy 36: pp. 335-347 CrossRef
- Selin, C. (2011). Negotiating plausibility: Intervening in the future of nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, this issue.
- van Oudheusden, M. (2011). Questioning ‘participation’: A critical appraisal of its conceptualization in a flemish participatory technology assessment. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, this issue.
- Participating Despite Questions: Toward a More Confident Participatory Technology Assessment
Science and Engineering Ethics
Volume 17, Issue 4 , pp 691-697
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Participatory technology assessment
- Consensus conference
- David H. Guston (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes Arizona State University, P.O. Box 875603, 1120 South Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA