Skip to main content
Log in

Placebo treatment is effective differently in different diseases — but is it also harmless? A brief synopsis

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The placebo drug reactions from controlled trials were studied for the first time systematically for efficacy and the safety in drug data pooled from randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre studies. Results: The efficacy of placebo on clinical symptoms and outcome varied between the therapeutic indications. However, no placebo effects on laboratory values, as e.g. blood glucose or Hb1c in diabetics, were noted. The frequency and type of placebo-induced adverse reactions also varied between indication groups. The placebo side effect profile was largely similar to the side effect profile of the active treatment. The mechanisms of placebo effects are manyfold and varied (e.g. endorphin release, conditioning), much lacks explanation. Conclusion: Since the prescription of non-evidence based medicines (= pseudoplacebos) may clearly also result in serious adverse effects, such practice may not only be non-beneficial but may even be harmful. In clinical research, the judicious use of placebo remains essential to establish the efficacy and safety, safeguarding that patients receiving placebo will not be subject to harm and are fully informed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weihrauch TR and Gauler TC (1999): Placebo — Efficacy and adverse effects in controlled clinical trials, Drug Res. 49 (I), 5: 385–93.

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Medical Association of Helsinki(as revised Edinburgh 2000), www.wma./net/policy.

  3. Lewis JA et al. (2002) Placebo controlled trials and the Declaration of Helsinki, Lancet 359: 1337–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Temple R, Ellenberg SS (2000) Placebo-controlled trials and active-controlled trials in the evaluation of new treatments, part1: ethical and scientific issues, Ann Intern Med 133: 455–62.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pigeot I, Schäfer J, Röhmel J, Hauschke D (2003) Assessing non-inferiority of a new treatment in a three-arm clinical trial including a placebo: Stat. Med. 22: 883–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. EMEA/CPMP Position statement on the use of placebo in clinical trials with regard to the revised Declaration of Helsinki. www.emea.eu.int/index/indexhl.htm (28 June 2001).

  7. Huston P and Petersen R (2001) Withholding proven treatment in clinical research, NEJM (editorial) 345: 912–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anonymous: Choice of control group in clinical trials, ICH E10 (2000).London: EMEA http://www.ich.org/ich7.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas R. Weihrauch MD, PhD.

Additional information

The author is Senior Vice President, Global Medical Strategy, Bayer AG and Associate Professor, Internal Medicine, University of Duesseldorf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weihrauch, T.R. Placebo treatment is effective differently in different diseases — but is it also harmless? A brief synopsis. SCI ENG ETHICS 10, 151–155 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0072-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0072-y

Keywords

Navigation