Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biomaterial Grafting Materials in Peyronie’s Disease

  • Male and Female Surgical Interventions (AL Burnett and CC Carson III, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Sexual Health Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plaque incision/excision and grafting are a specialized procedure reserved for men with Peyronie’s disease, featuring severe penile curvature, near-normal erectile function, and adequate erectile length. The choice of graft material requires careful consideration of the positive and negative attributes. Grafts may be divided into three distinct categories: synthetic, autologous, and extracellular materials. A description of each is presented below with a brief relevant literature review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Fischer LP, Ferrandis JJ, Blatteau JE. Francois de Lapeyronie, from Montpellier (1678-1747). “Surgery restorer” and universal spirit. The soul, Musc, rooster eggs. Hist Sci Med. 2009;43:241–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Androutsos G. Francois Gigot de La Peyronie (1678-1747), benefactor of surgery and supporter of the fusion of medicine and surgery, and the disease that bears his name. Prog Urol. 2002;12:527–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jarow JP, Lowe FC. Penile trauma: an etiologic factor in Peyronie’s disease and erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 1997;158:1388–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Somers KD, Dawson DM. Fibrin deposition in Peyronie’s disease plaque. J Urol. 1997;157:311–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Somers KD, Sismour EN, Wright Jr GL, Devine Jr CJ, Gilbert DA, Horton CE. Isolation and characterization of collagen in Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1989;141:629–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gentile V, Modesti A, La Pera G, et al. Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical characterization of the tunica albuginea in Peyronie’s disease and veno-occlusive dysfunction. J Androl. 1996;17:96–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis Jr CJ. The microscopic pathology of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1997;157:282–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonzalez-Cadavid NF. Mechanisms of penile fibrosis. J Sex Med. 2009;6 Suppl 3:353–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Del Carlo M, Cole AA, Levine LA. Differential calcium independent regulation of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases by interleukin-1beta and transforming growth factor-beta in Peyronie’s plaque fibroblasts. J Urol. 2008;179:2447–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Magee TR, Qian A, Rajfer J, Sander FC, Levine LA, Gonzalez-Cadavid NF. Gene expression profiles in the Peyronie’s disease plaque. Urology. 2002;59:451–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pryor J, Akkus E, Alter G, et al. Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2004;1:110–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kadioglu A, Akman T, Sanli O, Gurkan L, Cakan M, Celtik M. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a critical analysis. Eur Urol. 2006;50:235–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cormio L, Zucchi A, Lorusso F, et al. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease by plaque incision and grafting with buccal mucosa. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1469–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kathy Lue BS JBEM, Daniel R, Martinez MD, Christopher Yang MD, Rafael Carrion MD. Excision and patch grafting of a lateral Peyronie’s Plaque—utilizing a longitudinal “Window” approach. Sex Med Rev. 2015;3:86–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowsley OS, Boyce WH. Further experiences with an operation for the cure of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1950;63:888–902.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carson CC, Chun JL. Peyronie’s disease: surgical management: autologous materials. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:329–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Faerber GJ, Konnak JW. Results of combined Nesbit penile plication with plaque incision and placement of Dacron patch in patients with severe Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1993;149:1319–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schiffman ZJ, Gursel EO, Laor E. Use of Dacron patch graft in Peyronie disease. Urology. 1985;25:38–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ganabathi K, Dmochowski R, Zimmern PE, Leach GE. Peyronie’s disease: surgical treatment based on penile rigidity. J Urol. 1995;153:662–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leungwattanakij S, Bivalacqua TJ, Yang DY, Hyun JS, Hellstrom WJ. Comparison of cadaveric pericardial, dermal, vein, and synthetic grafts for tunica albuginea substitution using a rat model. BJU Int. 2003;92:119–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brannigan RE, Kim ED, Oyasu R, McVary KT. Comparison of tunica albuginea substitutes for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1998;159:1064–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Licht MR, Lewis RW. Modified Nesbit procedure for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a comparative outcome analysis. J Urol. 1997;158:460–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Devine Jr CJ, Horton CE. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease with a dermal graft. J Urol. 1974;111:44–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Horton CE, Sadove RC, Devine Jr CJ. Peyronie’s disease. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;18:122–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hicks CC, O’Brien 3rd DP, Bostwick 3rd J, Walton KN. Experience with the Horton-Devine dermal graft in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1978;119:504–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Frank JD, Mor SB, Pryor JP. The surgical correction of erectile deformities of the penis of 100 men. Br J Urol. 1981;53:645–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Benzel EC, McMillan R, Fowler MR, Landreneau MD, Kesterson L, Payne DL. Histological comparison of autogenous canine fascia lata, Gore-Tex, lyophilized human fascia lata, and autogenous canine vein for vascular patch graft material in a canine arteriotomy model. Neurosurgery. 1992;31:108–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalsi JS, Christopher N, Ralph DJ, Minhas S. Plaque incision and fascia lata grafting in the surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int. 2006;98:110–4. discussion 14–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kargi E, Yesilli C, Hosnuter M, Akduman B, Babuccu O, Mungan A. Relaxation incision and fascia lata grafting in the surgical correction of penile curvature in Peyronie’s disease. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:254–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Das S. Peyronie’s disease: excision and autografting with tunica vaginalis. J Urol. 1980;124:818–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Donnell PD. Results of surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1992;148:1184–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Das S, Maggio AJ. Tunica vaginalis autografting for Peyronie’s disease: an experimental study. Invest Urol. 1979;17:186–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hafez AT, Smith CR, McLorie GA, et al. Tunica vaginalis for correcting penile chordee in a rabbit model: is there a difference in flap versus graft? J Urol. 2001;166:1429–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Teloken C, Grazziotin T, Rhoden E, et al. Penile straightening with crural graft of the corpus cavernosum. J Urol. 2000;164:107–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Da Ros CT, Graziottin TM, Ribeiro E, Averbeck MA. Long-term follow-up of penile curvature correction utilizing autologous albugineal crural graft. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38:242–7. discussion 48–9. An excellent long-term report on crural grafts.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hatzichristou DG, Hatzimouratidis K, Apostolidis A, Tzortzis V, Bekos A, Ioannidis E. Corporoplasty using tunica albuginea free grafts for penile curvature: surgical technique and long-term results. J Urol. 2002;167:1367–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. El-Sakka AI, Rashwan HM, Lue TF. Venous patch graft for Peyronie’s disease. Part II: outcome analysis. J Urol. 1998;160:2050–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Montorsi FSA, Briganti A, et al. Five year follow up of plaque incision and vein grafting for Peyronie’s disease. San Francisco: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Urologic Association; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chang JA, Gholami SS, Lue TF. Surgical management: saphenous vein grafts. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:375–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nowicki M, Buczkowski P, Miskowiak B, Konwerska A, Ostalska-Nowicka D, Dyszkiewicz W. Immunocytochemical study on endothelial integrity of saphenous vein grafts harvested by minimally invasive surgery with the use of vascular mayo stripers. A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:244–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shioshvili TJ, Kakonashvili AP. The surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: replacement of plaque by free autograft of buccal mucosa. Eur Urol. 2005;48:129–33. discussion 34–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hellstrom WJ, Reddy S. Application of pericardial graft in the surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2000;163:1445–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chung E, Clendinning E, Lessard L, Brock G. Five-year follow-up of Peyronie’s graft surgery: outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2011;8:594–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Badylak SF, Record R, Lindberg K, Hodde J, Park K. Small intestinal submucosa: a substrate for in vitro cell growth. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1998;9:863–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Knoll LD. Use of small intestinal submucosa graft for the surgical management of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2007;178:2474–8. discussion 78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. John T, Bandi G, Santucci R. Porcine small intestinal submucosa is not an ideal graft material for Peyronie’s disease surgery. J Urol. 2006;176:1025–8. discussion 29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Jorjani M, Ahmadiani A, Ghanavi J, Seifalian AM. Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater. 2008;15:88–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Salehipour M, Izadpanah K, Safaei A, Kamranpoor M, Farsiani MR. Application of human amniotic membrane in canine penile tunica albuginea defect: first step toward an innovating new method for treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Int Braz J Urol. 2014;40:400–7. This article depicts a novel graft material for Peyronie’s disease.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Nelson Bennett declares the receipt of consultancy fees from American Medical Systems, Inc.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nelson Bennett.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Male and Female Surgical Interventions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bennett, N. Biomaterial Grafting Materials in Peyronie’s Disease. Curr Sex Health Rep 7, 145–150 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-015-0058-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-015-0058-6

Keywords

Navigation