Skip to main content
Log in

Police Hostage (Crisis) Negotiators in the US: A National Survey

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to gather information about the callout experience, personality, cognitive emotion regulation, and decision-make styles of active police hostage negotiators. It also sought to learn if hostage negotiators were different than the general population and a police officer not trained as a negotiator in each of these domains. The current study examined the above variables by surveying 514 active negotiators from 119 city, county, state, and other law enforcement agencies from 38 states using the Big 5 personality inventory, the Cognitive-Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), and General Decision-Making Style (GDMS) questionnaire and found a distinct Big 5 police personality profile and ways of cognitive-emotional regulation different from the general population. Other descriptive and correlational findings and implications for the training and selection of future police hostage negotiators are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsen S, Strype J (2010) Are they all the same? Norwegian police officers’ personality characteristics and tactics of conflict resolution. Polic Soc 20:99–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black J (2000) Personality testing and police selection: utility of the “Big Five”. N Z J Psychol 29:2–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina J, Doherty M, Schmitt N, Kaufman G, Smith R (1992) The “Big Five” personality factors in the IPI and MMPI: predictors of police performance. Pers Psychol 45:119–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa P, McRae R (1992) NEO-PI-R professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrick P, Chibnall J, Rosso M (2001) Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in police officer selection: Normative data and relation to the Inwald Personality Inventory. Prof Psychol: Res Pract 32:484–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detrick P, Chibnall J, Luebbert M (2004) The revised NEO personality inventory as predictor of police academy performance. Crim Justice Behav 31:676–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2015) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnefski N, Kraaij V (2007) Psychometric features and prospective relationships with depression and anxiety in adults. Eur J Psychol Assess 23:141–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P (2002) Manual for the use of the cognitive-emotion regulation questionnaire, Leiderdrop, The Netherlands

  • Gosling S, Rentfrow P, Swann W (2003) A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J Res Pers 37:504–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone J (2007) The twenty-five most serious errors made by police hostage and crisis Negotiators. J Police Crisis Negotiations 7:107–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb A (2010) Modern day hostage (crisis) negotiation: the evolution of an art form within the policing arena. Aggress Violent Behav 15:341–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb A, Brown S (2012) Hostage (crisis) negotiation: The potential role of negotiator personality, decision-making style, coping style and emotional intelligence on negotiator success. Int J Emerg Ment Health 14:41–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb A, Brown S, Hall P (2015) Personality traits and coping styles in UK police officers: do negotiators differ from their non-negotiator colleagues? Psychol Crime Law 21(4):347–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John P, Srivastava S (1999) The Big-Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin L, John O (eds) Handbook of personality: theory and research, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornfeld A (1995) Police officer candidate MMPI-2 performance: gender, ethnic, and normative factors. J Clin Psychol 51:536–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lanceley F (2004) Negotiation lessons learned by an FBI hostage negotiator. The Negotiator Magazine, December, pp. 1-6

  • Lau B, Hem E, Berg A, Ekeberg O, Torgersen S (2006) Personality types, coping, and stress in the Norwegian police service. Personal Individ Differ 41:971–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz J (1975) Psychological Attributes of Policemen: A Review of Research and Opinion. J Soc Issues 31:3–26

  • Lehrer J (2009) How We Decide. Mariner Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McMains M, Mullins W (2014) Crisis negotiations: Managing critical incidents and hostage situations in law enforcement and corrections, 5th edn. Anderson Publishing, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell J, Everly G (1997) Critical incident stress debriefing: An operations manual for the prevention of traumatic stress among emergency services and disaster workers. Chevron Publishing, Ellicott City

    Google Scholar 

  • Regini C (2002) Crisis negotiation teams: selection and training. FBI Law Enforcement Bull 3:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott S, Bruce R (1995) Decision-making style: the development and assessment of a new measure. Educ Psychol Meas 55:818–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twersky-Glasner A (2005) Police Personality: What Is It and Why Are They Like That?. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 20:56–67

  • Vecchi G, Van Hasselt V, Romano S (2005) Crisis (hostage) negotiation: current strategies and issues in high-risk conflict resolution. Aggress Violent Behav 10:533–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew T. Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Young, A.T. Police Hostage (Crisis) Negotiators in the US: A National Survey. J Police Crim Psych 31, 310–321 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9193-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9193-x

Keywords

Navigation