Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective Person Memory: The Role of Self-Efficacy, Personal Interaction, and Multiple Images in Recognition of Wanted Persons

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prospective person memory refers to recognition of individuals one has been asked to be on the lookout for, such as wanted criminals or missing persons. Past field experiments have tended to find very low rates of identification. The present experiments examine whether multiple pictures, personal interaction, and increased self-efficacy would improve prospective person memory. Participants viewed a mock wanted person alert and were told that if they saw the person depicted in the alert they could win a cash prize. The alert either showed a single picture of the target person or multiple pictures. The target individual then showed up at the dining hall participants routinely had lunch. Some participants had peronal interaction with the target and some participants were led to believe that the likelihood of encounter was quite high. Despite these manipulations, only a small number of participants reported seeing the target individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura A (1986) Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice- Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52:1–26

  • Bartlett JC, Leslie J (1986) Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces. Memory & Cognition 14:371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biederman I, Gehardstein P (1993) Recognising depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19:1162–1182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biederman I, Gehardstein P (1995) Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21:1506–1514

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan DR, Goldman M, Juhnke R (1977) Eye contact, sex, and the violation of personal space. Journal of Social Psychology 103:19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabris, C. & Simons, D. (2011). The Invisible Gorilla: How Our Intuitions Deceive Us. New York Random House.

  • Chabris CF, Wienberger A, Fontaine M, Simons DJ (2011) You do not talk about Fight Club if you do not notice Fight Club: Inattentional blindness for a simulated real-world assault. i-Perception 2:150–153

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein GO, McDaniel MA (1990) Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16:717–726

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein GO, McDaniel MA (2005) Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14:286–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth PC, Carlsmith JM, Henson A (1972) The stare as a stimulus to flight in human subjects: A series of field experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21:302–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enns JT (2004) The thinking eye, the seeing brain: Explorations in visual cognition. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff B (2007) An early history of hindsight research. Social Cognition 25:10–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, J. (March, 20, 2000). In demand for 50 years. U.S. News and World Report, 128(11), 60.

  • Hyman IE, Sarb BA, Wise-Swanson BM (2014) Failure to see money on a tree: Inattentional blindness for objects that guided behavior. Frontiers in Psychology 5:356

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. (2005). The ten most wanted list: A history. Infoplease Database. Retrieved July 22, 2005, from the World Wide Web: http://www.infoplease.com/spot/tenmostwanted.html

  • Johnston MB, Hayes A (2000) An experimental comparison of viewpoint-specific and viewpoint-independent models of object representation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 53A:792–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafayette, J. (1998, July, 27). Manhunt coverage taxes station’s resources. Electronic Media, 17(31), 35.

  • Lampinen J, Arnal JD, Adams J, Courtney K, Hicks JL (2012a) Forensic age progression and the search for missing children. Psychology, Crime & Law 18:405–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen J, Miller JT, Dehon H (2012b) Depicting the missing: Prospective and retrospective person memory for age progressed images. Applied Cognitive Psychology 26:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen J, Peters CS, Gier VS (2012c) Power in numbers: The effect of target set size on prospective person memory in an analog missing child scenario. Applied Cognitive Psychology 26:702–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen, J.M. & Moore, K.N. (in press). Prospective Person Memory in the Search for Missing Persons. In Stephen J. Morewitz and Caroline Sturdy Colls (Eds.), Handbook of Missing Persons. Springer.

  • Lampinen JM, Sweeney LN (2014) Associated adults: Prospective person memory for family abducted children. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 29:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen JM, Arnal JD, Hicks JL (2009) Prospective person memory. In: Kelley M (ed) Applied Memory. Nova, Hauppauge NY, pp 167–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen, J.M., Erickson, W.B., Sweeney, L.N., & Starr, J. (under review). Prospective person memory in a mock Silver Alert. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Li SZ, Jain AK (2011) Introduction. In: Li SZ, Jain AK (eds) Handbook of Face Recognition, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 1–18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacLin OH, Tapscott R, MacLin MK (2010) Face recognition in context: A case study of tips on a call-in crime TV show. North American Journal of Psychology 12:459–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr D, Nishihara HK (1978) Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 200:269–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh RL, Hicks JL, Landau JD (1998) An investigation of everyday prospective memory. Memory and Cognition 26:633–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh RL, Hicks JL, Cook GI, Hansen JS, Pallos AL (2003) Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 29:861–870

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel MA, Robinson-Riegler B, Einstein GO (1998) Prospective remembering: Perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes? Memory and Cognition 26:121–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rensink RA, O'Regan JK, Clark JJ (1997) To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science 8:368–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons DJ, Chabris CF (1999) Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28:1059–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons DJ, Levin DT (1998) Failure to detect change to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5:644–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BJ, Sanford F, Goldman M (1977) Norm violations, sex, and the “Blank stare”. The Journal of Social Psychology 103:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RE (2003) The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 29:347–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney LN, Lampinen JM (2012) The effect of presenting multiple images on prospective and retrospective person memory for missing children. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 1:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wert MJ, Horowitz TS, Wolfe JM (2009) Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71:541–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, G. (March, 13, 1995). Forty-five years of bad guys on the run. U.S. News and World Report, 118(10), 15.

  • Wolfe JM (2011) Visual search: Is it a matter of life and death? In: Gernsbacher MA, Pew RW, Hough LM, Pomerantz JR (eds) Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society. Worth Publishers, New York, NY, US, pp 46–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Michael Lampinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lampinen, J.M., Curry, C.R. & Erickson, W.B. Prospective Person Memory: The Role of Self-Efficacy, Personal Interaction, and Multiple Images in Recognition of Wanted Persons. J Police Crim Psych 31, 59–70 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9164-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9164-7

Keywords

Navigation