Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Not Candidates for Curative Surgery

  • Personalized Medicine in Colorectal Cancer (CMS Rocha-Lima, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports

Abstract

Metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. Novel cytotoxic and biologic therapies have been developed; however, their optimal use in terms of patient selection, drug combinations, and regimen sequences must be better defined. The FDA-approved drugs include fluoropyrimidines (5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with or without leucovorin (LV), capecitabine), irinotecan, oxaliplatin, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab for RAS wild-type patients, the VEGF receptors 1 and 2 fusion protein aflibercept and the multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib. As a result, metastatic colorectal cancer median overall survival can now be as long as 33 months and up to 70 % of patients will receive at least two lines of treatment. Recent scientific and technologic advances in the field of metastatic colorectal cancer promise to elucidate the biological underpinnings of this disease and its therapies for the goal of improving personalized treatments for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Malvezzi M, Bertuccio P, Levi F, La Vecchia C, Negri E. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2012. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1044–52. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stintzing S, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Vehling-Kaiser U, Jäger E, Heintges T, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-subgroup analysis of patients with KRAS: mutated tumours in the randomised German AIO study KRK-0306. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1693–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Láng I, Folprecht G, Nowacki MP, Cascinu S, et al. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2011–9. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, et al. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4697–705. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kopetz S, Chang GJ, Overman MJ, Eng C, Sargent DJ, Larson DW, et al. Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3677–83. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5278.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Falcone A, Cremolini C, Masi G. FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab (bev) versus FOLFIRI/bev as first-line treatment in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts): results of the phase III TRIBE trial by GONO group. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31suppl:3505 [abstract].

  7. Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Al-Batran SE, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70330-4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Folprecht G, Gruenberger T, Bechstein WO, Raab HR, Lordick F, Hartmann JT, et al. Tumour response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:38–47. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70330-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morris EJ, Forman D, Thomas JD, Quirke P, Taylor EF, Fairley L, et al. Surgical management and outcomes of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1110–8. doi:10.1002/bjs.7032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grothey A, Marshall JL. Optimizing palliative treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of biologic therapy. Oncology (Williston Park). 2007;21:553–64.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G, et al. Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2282–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arkenau HT, Arnold D, Cassidy J, et al. Efficacy of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine or infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5910–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cassidy J, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, et al. Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2006–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Porschen R, Arkenau HT, Kubicka S, et al. Phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil and leucovorin plus oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer: a final report of the AIO Colorectal Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4217–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haller DG, Cassidy J, Clarke SJ, et al. Potential regional differences for the tolerability profiles of fluoropyrimidines. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2118–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Cutsem E, Findlay M, Osterwalder B, et al. Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate with substantial activity in advanced colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1337–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hochster HS, Hart LL, Ramanathan RK, et al. Safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine regimens with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the TREE Study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3523–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD, et al. Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1998;352:1413–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rougier P, Van Cutsem E, Bajetta E, et al. Randomised trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1998;352:1407–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, et al. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:905–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kohne CH, van Cutsem E, Wils J, et al. Phase III study of weekly high-dose infusional fluorouracil plus folinic acid with or without irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40986. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4856–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1041–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Innocenti F, Undevia SD, Iyer L, et al. Genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene predict the risk of severe neutropenia of irinotecan. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1382–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2938–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Giacchetti S, Perpoint B, Zidani R, et al. Phase III multicenter randomized trial of oxaliplatin added to chronomodulated fluorouracil-leucovorin as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:136–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grothey A, Deschler B, Kroening H, et al. Phase III study of bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/ folinic acid (FA) (Mayo) vs. weekly high-dose 24h 5-FU infusion/ FA + oxaliplatin (OXA) in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2001;21:(abstr 512).

  27. Rothenberg ML, Oza AM, Bigelow RH, et al. Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil-leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil-leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2059–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ducreux M, Bennouna J, Hebbar M, et al. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-6) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:682–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang C, Wang J, Gu H, et al. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oncol Lett. 2012;3:831–8.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF, et al. A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:23–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Colucci G, Gebbia V, Paoletti G, et al. Phase III randomized trial of FOLFIRI versus FOLFOX4 in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter study of the Gruppo Oncologico Dell’Italia Meridionale. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4866–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tournigand C, Andre T, Achille E, et al. FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:229–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Grothey A, Sargent D, Goldberg RM, et al. Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1209–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, et al. Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1670–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hicklin DJ, Ellis LM. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1011–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Presta LG, Chen H, O’Connor SJ, et al. Humanization of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal anti- body for the therapy of solid tumors and other disorders. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4593–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2335–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kabbinavar FF, Hambleton J, Mass RD, et al. Combined analysis of efficacy: the addition of bevacizumab to fluorouracil/leucovorin improves survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3706–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Saltz LB, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2013–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Mitchell E, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC-C Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4779–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Grothey A. Recognizing and managing toxicities of molecular targeted therapies for colorectal cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2006;20:21–8.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1539–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nalluri SR, Chu D, Keresztes R, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:2277–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hurwitz HI, Saltz LB, Van Cutsem E, et al. Venous thromboembolic events with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: a pooled analysis of patients in randomized phase II and III studies. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1757–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Falcone A, Cremolini C, Masi G, et al. FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab (bev) versus FOLFIRI/bev as first-line treatment in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts): results of the phase III TRIBE trial by GONO group [abstract]. ASCO Meet Abstr. 2013;31:3505.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Loupakis F, Cremolini C, Masi G, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) versus FOLFIRI plus bev as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): results of the phase III randomized TRIBE trial [abstract]. ASCO Meet Abstr. 2013;31:336.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gruenberger T, Bridgewater JA, Chau I, et al. Randomized, phase II study of bevacizumab with mFOLFOX6 or FOLFOXIRI in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: resectability and safety in OLIVIA [abstract]. ASCO Meet Abstr. 2013;31:3619.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Saltz LB, Lenz HJ, Kindler HL, et al. Randomized phase II trial of cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan compared with cetuximab and bevacizumab alone in irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer: the BOND-2 study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4557–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hecht JR, Mitchell E, Chidiac T, et al. A randomized phase IIIB trial of chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and panitumumab compared with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:672–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tol J, Koopman M, Cats A, et al. Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:563–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Saltz LB, Meropol NJ, Loehrer Sr PJ, et al. Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1201–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:337–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, et al. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1658–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, et al. Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2040–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chung CH, Mirakhur B, Chan E, et al. Cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis and IgE specific for galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1109–17.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, et al. Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4697–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Lang I, et al. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2011–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1626–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Artale S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Veronese SM, et al. Mutations of KRAS and BRAF in primary and matched metastatic sites of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4217–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Hartmann JT, et al. KRAS status and efficacy of first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: the OPUS experience. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(May 20 suppl; abstr 4000).

  62. Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, et al. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1757–65. The authors analyzed tumor samples, obtained from 394 patients with colorectal cancer who were randomly assigned to receive cetuximab plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone, to look for activating mutations in exon 2 of the K-ras gene and showed that mutated K-ras did not benefit from cetuximab, whereas patients with a tumor bearing wild-type K-ras did benefit from cetuximab.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, et al. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3992–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rajagopalan H, Bardelli A, Lengauer C, et al. Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status. Nature. 2002;418:934.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Malumbres M, Barbacid M. RAS oncogenes: the first 30 years. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:459–65.

  66. Douillard JY, Oliner KS, Siena S, et al. Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1023–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Stintzing S, Jung A, Rossius L, et al. Analysis of KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in FIRE-3: a randomized phase III study of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab as first-line treatment for wild-type KRAS (exon 2) metastatic colorectal cancer patients [abstract]. ESMO Eur Cancer Congr 2013;E17-7073.

  68. Heinemann et al. Independent radiological evaluation of objective response, early tumor shrinkage, and depth of response in FIRE-3. Oral abstract present at WCGC 2014.

  69. Package Insert. Vectibix® (Panitumumab). Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc.; 2013. Available at: http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=e0fa4bca-f245-4d92-ae29-b0c630a315c2. Accessed 26 Feb 2013.

  70. De Roock W, Jonker DJ, Di Nicolantonio F, et al. Association of KRAS p.G13D mutation with outcome in patients with chemotherapy- refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. JAMA. 2010;304:1812–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Peeters M, Douillard JY, Van Cutsem E, et al. Mutant KRAS codon 12 and 13 alleles in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: assessment as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response to panitumumab. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:759–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lang I, Kohne CH, Folprecht G, et al. Quality of life analysis in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated first- line with cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:439–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Maughan TS, Adams RA, Smith CG, et al. Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet. 2011;377:2103–14.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Taieb J, Maughan T, Bokemeyer C, et al. Cetuximab combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a pooled analysis of COIN and OPUS study data [abstract]. ASCO Meet Abstr. 2012;30:3574.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Tveit KM, Guren T, Glimelius B, et al. Phase III trial of cetuximab with continuous or intermittent fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) versus FLOX alone in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the NORDIC-VII study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1755–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz H-J, et al. Abstract 501O—CALGB/SWOG 80405: PHASE III trial of irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) with bevacizumab (BV) or cetuximab (CET) for patients (pts) with expanded ras analyses untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (MCRC). ESMO Annual Meeting. Presented September 29, 2014.

  77. Adams RA, Meade AM, Seymour MT, Wilson RH, Madi A, Fisher D, et al. Intermittent versus continuous oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(7)642–53. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70102-4.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Kohne CH, De Greve J, Hartmann JT, et al. Irinotecan combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid or capecitabine plus celecoxib or placebo in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. EORTC study 40015. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:920–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Pectasides D, Papaxoinis G, Kalogeras K, et al. XELIRI- bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI-bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group phase III trial with collateral biomarker analysis. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:271.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Cunningham D, Lang I, Marcuello E, Lorusso V, Ocvirk J, Shin DB, et al. Bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously un-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (AVEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1077–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Cao Y, Tan A, Gao F, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with chemotherapy alone in metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:677–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Hurwitz HI, Tebbutt NC, Kabbinavar F, et al. Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis from seven randomized controlled trials. Oncologist. 2013. This analysis pooled individual patient data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to more thoroughly examine clinical outcomes when adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

  83. Loupakis F, Bria E, Vaccaro V, et al. Magnitude of benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29:58.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Lv C, Wu S, Zheng D, et al. The efficacy of additional bevacizumab to cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis for randomized trials. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2013;28:501–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Welch S, Spithoff K, Rumble RB, Maroun J. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1152–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Macedo LT, da Costa Lima AB, Sasse AD. Addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with emphasis on chemotherapy subgroups. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:89.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Meyerhardt JA, Li L, Sanoff HK, et al. Effectiveness of bevacizumab with first-line combination chemotherapy for Medicare patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:608–15.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Grothey A. Optimized treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Educational Book. ASCO. 2009;209–11.

  89. Holash J, Davis S, Papadopoulos N, et al. VEGF-Trap: a VEGF blocker with potent antitumor effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America website. April 19, 2002. Accessed 20 Aug 2012.

  90. Tournigand C, Cervantes A, Figer A, et al. OPTIMOX1: a randomized study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop-and-go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer–a GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:394–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Chibaudel B, Maindrault-Goebel F, Lledo G, et al. Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5727–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Díaz-Rubio E, Gómez-España A, Massutí B, Sastre J, Abad A, Valladares M, et al. First-line XELOX plus bevacizumab followed by XELOX plus bevacizumab or single-agent bevacizumab as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase III MACRO TTD study. Oncologist. 2012;17:15–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Koopman M, Simkens L, May AM, et al. Final results and subgroup analyses of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study: maintenance treatment with capecitabine + bevacizumab versus observation after induction treatment with chemotherapy + bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Presented at the 2014 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; Abstract 3504.

  94. Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, et al. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision mak- ing. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2479–516. Treatment decisions must be based on the available evidence, which has been the basis for this consensus conference-based guideline delivering a clear proposal for diagnostic and treatment measures in each stage of rectal and colon cancer and the individual clinical situations. This ESMO guideline is recommended to be used as the basis for treatment and management decisions.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Rose LJ. Colon Cancer Treatment Protocols. Medscape. Updated May 29, 2014. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2005487-overview. Updates in treatment protocols for colon cancer are provided in this Medscape overview, including adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for resectable disease and chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic colon cancer.

  96. Package Insert. ZALTRAP® (ziv-aflibercept). Bridgewater: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. / sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC; 2013. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/125418s02 0lbl.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2014.

  97. Tabernero J, Van Cutsem E, Lakomy R, et al. Aflibercept versus placebo in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan in the treatment of previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: prespecified subgroup analyses from the VELOUR trial. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:320–31. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24140268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Package Insert. STIVARGA (regorafenib) tablets, oral. Wayne: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals; 2013. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/203085s001lbl.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2014.

  99. Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo- controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:303–12. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23177514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Argiles G, Troiani T, Rivera F, et al. First-line treatment with regorafenib in combination with mFOLFOX6 for metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial; Presented at the European Society of Medical Oncology 2013 Congress; September 27–October 1, 2013; Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Abstract 2367.

  101. UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. ClinicalTrialsgov [website on the Internet] Bethseda, MD: US National Library of Medicine; 2011. [Accessed November 1, 2011]. Regorafenib+FOLFIRI Versus Placebo+FOLFIRI as 2nd Line Tx in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. [updated August 20, 2013]. Available from: http://clinicaltrial.gov/show/NCT01298570. NLM identifier: NCT01298570.

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Andre M. Murad and Lucas S. Murad declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oncology Service, Hospital das Clinicas, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Rua Piaui, 150, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30150-320, Brazil

    Andre M. Murad & Lucas S. Murad

  2. CENANTRON—Centro Avançado de Tratamento Oncológico, Rua Piaui, 150, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30150-320, Brazil

    Andre M. Murad & Lucas S. Murad

Authors
  1. Andre M. Murad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucas S. Murad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andre M. Murad.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Personalized Medicine in Colorectal Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murad, A.M., Murad, L.S. First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Not Candidates for Curative Surgery. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 11, 54–69 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-015-0259-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-015-0259-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation