Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:225–249.CrossRefPubMed
Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A, et al.: Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2005, 352:2061–2068.CrossRefPubMed
Strul H, Kariv R, Leshno M, et al.: The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40–80 years. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:255–262.CrossRefPubMed
East JE, Saunders BP, Jass JR: Sporadic and syndromic hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas of the colon: classification, molecular genetics, natural history, and clinical management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008, 37:25–46.CrossRefPubMed
Skibber J, Minsky B, Hoff P: Cancer of the colon. In Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology, edn 6. Edited by DeVita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg S. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001:1216–1271.
• Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al.: Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993, 329:1977–1983. The National Polyp Study is the foundation for colorectal adenoma surveillance protocols.
Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al.: Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58:130–160.CrossRefPubMed
Lieberman D: Screening, surveillance, and prevention of colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2008, 18:595–605.CrossRefPubMed
Martínez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al.: A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009, 136:832–841.CrossRefPubMed
•• Kahi CJ, Rex DK, Imperiale TF: Screening, surveillance, and primary prevention for colorectal cancer: a review of the recent literature. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:380–399. This article comprehensively reviews the risk factors for colorectal adenoma and CRC and the different options for screening, surveillance, and chemoprevention. It also offers a concise discussion on the issue of quality control in colonoscopy.
•• Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al.: Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2006, 56:143–159. This is a detailed review of the guidelines for endoscopic surveillance after polypectomy as established by the ACS-USMSTF.
Pasetto LM, Monfardini S: Colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients: when should be more useful? Cancer Treat Rev 2007, 33:528–532.CrossRefPubMed
Ferguson CB, Porter KG, Murphy SJ: Nine-year follow-up of a patient with attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis treated with cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008, 43:1534–1536.CrossRefPubMed
Hassan C, Zullo A, Winn S, et al.: The colorectal malignant polyp: scoping a dilemma. Dig Liver Dis 2007, 39:92–100.CrossRefPubMed
•• Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Albert PS: Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years. Ann Intern Med 2008, 148:419–426. This article assesses the 2006 postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines.
Saini SD, Rahul NS, Kuhn L, et al.: Why don’t gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines? J Clin Gastroenterol 2009, 43:554–558.CrossRefPubMed
Mulder SA, Ouwendijk RJ, van Leerdam ME, et al.: A nationwide survey evaluating adherence to guidelines for follow-up after polypectomy or treatment for colorectal cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008, 42:487–492.CrossRefPubMed
Chivers KC, Basnyat P, Taffinder N: The impact of national guidelines on the waiting list for colonoscopy: a quantitative clinical audit. Colorectal Dis 2009 Apr 10 (Epub ahead of print).
Boolchand V, Olds G, Singh J, et al.: Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Ann Intern Med 2006, 145:654–659.PubMed
West NJ, Boustiere C, Fischbach W, et al.: Colorectal cancer screening in Europe: differences in approach; similar barriers to overcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009, 24:731–740.CrossRefPubMed
Rapuri S, Spencer J, Eckels D: Importance of surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening—review of literature. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008, 23:453–459.CrossRefPubMed
van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al.: Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:343–350.CrossRefPubMed
• Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al.: Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009, 6:1–8. This article describes the limitation of colonoscopy in detecting right-sided colonic neoplasia.
Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, et al.: Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007, 132:96–102.CrossRefPubMed
Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al.: Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006, 355:2533–2541.CrossRefPubMed
Morini S, Hassan C, Zullo A, et al.: Detection of colonic polyps according to insertion/withdrawal phases of colonoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009, 24;527–530.CrossRefPubMed
Sawhney MS, Cury MS, Neeman N, et al.: Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 min on polyp detection. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:1892–1898.CrossRefPubMed
Thuraisingam AI, Brown JL, Anderson JT: What are the sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic photographs in determining completion of colonoscopy? Results from an online questionnaire. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008, 20:567–571.CrossRefPubMed
Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, et al.: A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:894–909.CrossRefPubMed
Chan MY, Cohen H, Spiegel BM: fewer polyps detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses at a Veteran’s Administration teaching hospital. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 Jul 22 (Epub ahead of print).
Chen SC, Rex DK: Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:856–861.CrossRefPubMed
Millan MS, Gross P, Manilich E, et al.: Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2008, 51:1217–1220.CrossRefPubMed
• Bretagne JF, Ponchon T: Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy? Endoscopy 2008, 40:523–528. This article clearly explains the need for quality control in colonoscopy and the rationale behind using ADR as a quality indicator.
Sanaka MR, Deepinder F, Thota PN, et al.: Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2009, 104:1659–1664.CrossRefPubMed
Sanaka MR, Super DM, Feldman ES, et al.: Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:97–103.CrossRefPubMed
Ling BS, Schoen RE, Trauth JM, et al.: Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening. Arch Intern Med 2009, 169:47–55.CrossRefPubMed
Matsumoto T, Esaki M, Fujisawa R, et al.: Chromoendoscopy, narrow-band imaging colonoscopy, and autofluorescence colonoscopy for detection of diminutive colorectal neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2009, 52:1160–1165.PubMed
Chang CC, Hsieh CR, Lou HY, et al.: Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, magnifying chromoendoscopy, and magnifying narrow-band imaging systems in the differential diagnosis of small colonic polyps between trainee and experienced endoscopist. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009 Jul 15 (Epub ahead of print).
Inoue T, Murano M, Murano N, et al.: Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 2008, 43:45–50.CrossRefPubMed
Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T, et al.: Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2009, 136:410–416.CrossRefPubMed
Pellise M, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Cardens A, et al.: Impact of wide angle, high definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:1062–1068.CrossRefPubMed
East JE, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S, et al.: A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008, 28:768–776.CrossRefPubMed
Matsuda T, Saito Y, Fu KI, et al.: Does autofluorescence imaging videoendoscopy system improve the colonoscopic polyp detection rate?—a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:1926–1932.CrossRefPubMed
McCallum AL, Jenkins JT, Gillen D, et al.: Evaluation of autofluorescence colonoscopy for the detection and diagnosis of colonic polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2008, 68:283–290.CrossRefPubMed
Fatima H, Rex DK, Rothstein R, et al.: Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008, 6:109–114.CrossRefPubMed
Rex DK: Third eye retroscope: rationale, efficacy, challenges. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2009, 9:1–6.PubMed
Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y: Improved colorectal adenoma detection with a transparent retractable extension device. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:341–345.CrossRefPubMed
Sansbury LB, Wanke K, Albert PS, et. al.: The effect of strict adherence to a high-fiber, high-fruit and -vegetable, and low-fat eating pattern on adenoma recurrence. Am J Epidemiol 2009, 170:576–584.CrossRefPubMed
Shrubsole MJ, Wu H, Ness RM, et al.: Alcohol drinking, cigarette smoking, and risk of colorectal adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps. Am J Epidemiol 2008, 167:1050–1058.CrossRefPubMed
Kang HW, Kim D, Kim HJ, et al.: Visceral obesity and insulin resistance as risk factors for colorectal adenoma: a cross-sectional, case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009 Sep 15 (Epub ahead of print).
Le Leu RK, Hu Y, Brown IL, et al.: Synbiotic intervention of bifidobacterium lactis and resistant starch protects against colorectal cancer development in rats. Carcinogenesis 2009 Aug 20 (Epub ahead of print).
Faris MA, Takruri HR, Shomaf MS, et al.: Chemopreventive effect of raw and cooked lentils (Lens culinaris L) and soybeans (Glycine max) against azoxymethane-induced aberrant crypt foci. Nutr Res 2009, 29:355–362.CrossRefPubMed
Jedrychowski W, Maugeri U: An apple a day may hold colorectal cancer at bay: recent evidence from a case-control study. Rev Environ Health 2009, 24:59–74.PubMed
Satia JA, Littman A, Slatore CG, et al.: Associations of herbal and specialty supplements with lung and colorectal cancer risk in the VITamins and Lifestyle study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009, 18:1419–1428.CrossRefPubMed