Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of maternal mortality, and clinical diagnosis of CVD in women during pregnancy is challenging. Pregnant women with known heart disease require careful multidisciplinary management by obstetric and medical teams to assess for maternal and fetal risk. Echocardiography is a safe and effective diagnostic tool indicated in pregnant women with cardiac symptoms or women with known cardiac disease for appropriate selection of women who require close monitoring of cardiac condition and valvular function. Echocardiography is the single most important clinical tool to diagnose and manage heart disease during pregnancy. Echocardiography is able to characterize cardiac structural abnormalities and corresponding hemodynamic changes, identifies heart diseases that are poorly tolerated in pregnancy, and helps select patients who may require a cesarean delivery because of hemodynamic instability. An understanding of the physiologic alterations including increased heart rate, blood volume, and cardiac output as well as the decreased vascular resistance is important for early recognition and monitoring of the consequences of cardiac disease in pregnancy. This review will focus on common acquired cardiac lesions encountered during pregnancy and the role of echocardiography in the diagnosis and management of these diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Regitz-Zagrosek V, Blomstrom Lundqvist C, Borghi C, et al. ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32:3147–397. The guideline provides a thorough description of how to manage cardiovascular disease in pregnancy.
Matthews TJ, Hamilton BE. Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life. NCHS Data Brief. 2009;21:1–8.
Desai DK, Moodley J, Naidoo DP. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiovascular hemodynamics in normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:20–9.
Keser N. Echocardiography in pregnant women. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2006;6:169–73.
Poppas A, Shroff SG, Korcarz CE, et al. Serial assessment of the cardiovascular system in normal pregnancy. Role of arterial compliance and pulsatile arterial load. Circulation. 1997;95:2407–15. The study provides a systemic assessment of cardiovascular system in normal pregnancy.
Siu SC, Colman JM. Heart disease and pregnancy. Heart. 2001;85:710–5.
Naqvi TZ, Sum LM, Elkayam U. Pregnancy and the heart. In: Lang RM et al., editors. ASE’s comprehensive echocardiography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier-Saunder; 2015. p. 797–800.
Sadaniantz A, Kocheril AG, Emaus SP, et al. Cardiovascular changes in pregnancy evaluated by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1992;5:253–8.
Savu O, Jurcut R, Giusca S, et al. Morphological and functional adaptation of the maternal heart during pregnancy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:289–97.
Geva T, Mauer MB, Striker L, et al. Effects of physiologic load of pregnancy on left ventricular contractility and remodeling. Am Heart J. 1997;133:53–9.
Gilson GJ, Samaan S, Crawford MH, et al. Changes in hemodynamics, ventricular remodeling, and ventricular contractility during normal pregnancy: a longitudinal study. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:957–62.
Robson SC, Hunter S, Boys RJ, Dunlop W. Serial changes in pulmonary haemodynamics during human pregnancy: a non-invasive study using Doppler echocardiography. Clin Sci (Lond). 1991;80:113–7.
Estensen ME, Beitnes JO, Grindheim G, et al. Altered maternal left ventricular contractility and function during normal pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:659–66.
Mone SM, Sanders SP, Colan SD. Control mechanisms for physiological hypertrophy of pregnancy. Circulation. 1996;94:667–72.
Lee MS NM, Qamruddin S. et al. Assessment of cardiac structure and function by three-dimensional echocardiography in healthy pregnant women. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013; 26.
Grindheim G, Estensen ME, Langesaeter E, et al. Changes in blood pressure during healthy pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study. J Hypertens. 2012;30:342–50.
Naqvi T.Z. LMS, Aldridge M, et al. Normal cardiac adaptation during pregnancy—assessment by velocity vector imaging and three dimensional echocardiography in healthy pregnant women. Circulation. 2013; 128:A16377
Nagueh SF, Sun H, Kopelen HA, et al. Hemodynamic determinants of the mitral annulus diastolic velocities by tissue Doppler. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:278–85.
Moran AM, Colan SD, Mauer MB, Geva T. Adaptive mechanisms of left ventricular diastolic function to the physiologic load of pregnancy. Clin Cardiol. 2002;25:124–31.
Fok WY, Chan LY, Wong JT, et al. Left ventricular diastolic function during normal pregnancy: assessment by spectral tissue Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:789–93.
Mesa A, Jessurun C, Hernandez A, et al. Left ventricular diastolic function in normal human pregnancy. Circulation. 1999;99:511–7.
Liu S, Ma C, Ren W, et al. Left atrial systolic and diastolic dysfunction in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis: a study using speckle tracking and conventional echocardiography. PLoS One. 2013;8, e68718.
Katz R, Karliner JS, Resnik R. Effects of a natural volume overload state (pregnancy) on left ventricular performance in normal human subjects. Circulation. 1978;58:434–41.
Song G, Liu J, Ren W, et al. Reversible changes of left atrial function during pregnancy assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. PLoS One. 2015;10, e0125347.
Roeder HA, Kuller JA, Barker PC, James AH. Maternal valvular heart disease in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2011;66:561–71. The study provides a thorough description of the epidemiology of valvular heart disease in pregnancy, classify the pathophysiology of valvular disease and evaluate the general principles of maternal and fetal management for cardiac disease.
Abduljabbar HS, Marzouki KM, Zawawi TH, Khan AS. Pericardial effusion in normal pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1991;70:291–4.
Elliott P, Andersson B, Arbustini E, et al. Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the European Society Of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:270–6.
Sliwa K, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Petrie MC, et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of peripartum cardiomyopathy: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripartum cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:767–78.
Sliwa K, Fett J, Elkayam U. Peripartum cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2006;368:687–93.
Elkayam U, Akhter MW, Singh H, et al. Pregnancy-associated cardiomyopathy: clinical characteristics and a comparison between early and late presentation. Circulation. 2005;111:2050–5.
Ntusi NB, Badri M, Gumedze F, et al. Pregnancy-associated heart failure: a comparison of clinical presentation and outcome between hypertensive heart failure of pregnancy and idiopathic peripartum cardiomyopathy. PLoS One. 2015;10, e0133466.
Kharwar RB, Chandra S, Dwivedi SK, Saran RK. A pedunculated left ventricular thrombus in a women with peripartum cardiomyopathy: evaluation by three dimensional echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2014;22:139–43.
Goland S, Bitar F, Modi K, et al. Evaluation of the clinical relevance of baseline left ventricular ejection fraction as a predictor of recovery or persistence of severe dysfunction in women in the United States with peripartum cardiomyopathy. J Card Fail. 2011;17:426–30.
Karaye KM, Henein MY. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: a review article. Int J Cardiol. 2013;164:33–8.
Kaul S, Tei C, Hopkins JM, Shah PM. Assessment of right ventricular function using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J. 1984;107:526–31.
Attalla W, Gaber R, Bayomy S. Detection of early left ventricular dysfunction in patients with maternal placental syndrome using tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2015;34:80–9.
Roos-Hesselink JW, Ruys TP, Stein JI, et al. Outcome of pregnancy in patients with structural or ischaemic heart disease: results of a registry of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:657–65.
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:2440–92.
Arafeh JM, Baird SM. Cardiac disease in pregnancy. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2006;29:32–52.
Rokey R, Hsu HW, Moise KJ, et al. Inaccurate noninvasive mitral valve area calculation during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:950–5.
Faletra F, Pezzano Jr A, Fusco R, et al. Measurement of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis: four echocardiographic methods compared with direct measurement of anatomic orifices. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1190–7.
Min SY, Song JM, Kim YJ, et al. Discrepancy between mitral valve areas measured by two-dimensional planimetry and three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in patients with mitral stenosis. Heart. 2013;99:253–8.
Lesniak-Sobelga A, Tracz W, KostKiewicz M, et al. Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of pregnant women with valvular heart diseases—maternal and fetal outcome. Int J Cardiol. 2004;94:15–23.
Elkayam U, Bitar F. Valvular heart disease and pregnancy part I: native valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:223–30.
Esteves CA, Munoz JS, Braga S, et al. Immediate and long-term follow-up of percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty in pregnant patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:812–6.
Abascal VM, Wilkins GT, O’Shea JP, et al. Prediction of successful outcome in 130 patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy. Circulation. 1990;82:448–56.
Stoddard MF, Longaker RA, Vuocolo LM, Dawkins PR. Transesophageal echocardiography in the pregnant patient. Am Heart J. 1992;124:785–7.
Sugishita Y, Ito I, Kubo T. Pregnancy in cardiac patients: possible influence of volume overload by pregnancy on pulmonary circulation. Jpn Circ J. 1986;50:376–83.
Banning AP, Pearson JF, Hall RJ. Role of balloon dilatation of the aortic valve in pregnant patients with severe aortic stenosis. Br Heart J. 1993;70:544–5.
Arias F, Pineda J. Aortic stenosis and pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 1978;20:229–32.
Weiss BM, Zemp L, Seifert B, Hess OM. Outcome of pulmonary vascular disease in pregnancy: a systematic overview from 1978 through 1996. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1650–7. The study provides the evidence of maternal prognosis depends on the early diagnosis of pulmonary vascular disease, early hospital admission, individually tailored treatment during pregnancy and medical therapy and care focused on the postpartal period.
Weiss BM, Hess OM. Pulmonary vascular disease and pregnancy: current controversies, management strategies, and perspectives. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:104–15.
Callaghan WM. Overview of maternal mortality in the United States. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36:2–6.
Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, et al. Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. Bjog. 2011; 118 Suppl 1:1–203.
Turitz AL, Friedman AM. Ischemic heart disease in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38:304–8.
MacPhail A, Davies GA, Victory R, Wolfe LA. Maximal exercise testing in late gestation: fetal responses. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:565–70.
Szymanski LM, Satin AJ. Exercise during pregnancy: fetal responses to current public health guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:603–10.
Colletti PM, Lee KH, Elkayam U. Cardiovascular imaging of the pregnant patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:515–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Shuang Liu, Uri Elkayam, and Tasneem Z. Naqvi declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Echocardiography
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Video 1
Apical four chamber view in a 31-year-old female with postpartum cardiomyopathy. (MP4 652 kb)
Video 2
Short-axis view of the mitral valve in a 32-year-old pregnant female showing severe rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (MP4 9564 kb)
Video 3
Apical four chamber view in the same patient showing turbulent flow across a stenotic mitral valve and mild mitral regurgitation (MP4 6311 kb)
Video 4
Transesophageal short-axis view at the mid esophageal level showing stenotic aortic valve with commissural fusion and thickening and a central coaptation gap that resulted in moderate aortic insufficiency. (MP4 39225 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Elkayam, U. & Naqvi, T.Z. Echocardiography in Pregnancy: Part 1. Curr Cardiol Rep 18, 92 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0760-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0760-7