Abstract
Purpose of Review
Mixed urinary incontinence, though common, is often challenging for clinicians to treat. With guidelines and best practice statements published for overactive bladder and stress urinary incontinence, respectively, we rely on current research for data to support treatment decisions for mixed urinary incontinence. The goal of this paper is to review the research and better understand the outcomes that can be expected in patients with mixed urinary incontinence who undergo a mid-urethral sling.
Recent Findings
Seven articles published from 2011 to 2016 were reviewed that directly addressed this clinical question. Greater than 50% subjective cure rate of urgency-related symptoms was reported in these studies with some as high as 89%. Age, body mass index, and previous incontinence surgeries were found to influence the outcomes.
Summary
Improvement in urge-related symptoms is commonly seen after a sling is placed for mixed urinary incontinence. Managing patient expectations and patient education is critical in these difficult clinical scenarios.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Abdel-Fattah M, Mostafa A, Young D, Ramsay I. Evaluation of transobturator tension-free vaginal tapes in the management of women with mixed urinary incontinence: one-year outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:150e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.018.
Abdel-Fattah M, Hopper LR, Mostafa A. Evaluation of transobturator tension-free vaginal tapes in the surgical management of mixed urinary incontinence: 3-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. J Ruol. 2014;191:114–9. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.035.
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al. The Standardization of Terminology of Lower Urinary Tract Function. Joint publication: Neurourol.Urodyn 21(2):167–178 (2002 Wiley) Urology 61: 37–49, (2003 Elsevier).
Appell RA, Dmochowski RR, Blaivas JM, Gormley EA, Karram MM, Juma S, et al. Guideline for the management of stress urinary incontinence: 2009 update. American Urological Association. 2009.
Balachandran A, Duckett J. Does the diagnosis of detrusor overactivity affect the long-term prognosis of patients treated with a retropubic mid-urethral sling? Int Urogynecol J. 2016. doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3058-9.
Chai TC, Kenton K, Sirls L, Zyczynski H, Wilson TS, Rahn DD, et al. Effects of concomitant surgeries during mid-urethral slings (MUS) on postoperative complications, voiding dysfunction, continence outcomes, and urodynamic variables. J Urol. 2012;79:1256–61. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.048.
Crescenze IM, Abraham N, Li J, Goldman HB, Vasavada S. Urgency incontinence before and after revision of a synthetic mid urethral sling. J Urol. 2016;196:478–83. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.091.
Dieter AA, Edenfield A, Weidner AC, Levin PJ, Siddiqui NY. Does concomitant anterior-apical repair during mid-urethral sling improve the overactive bladder component of mixed incontinence? Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1269–75. doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2400-3.
•• Funk MJ, Levin PJ, Wu JM. Trends in surgical management of stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(4):845–51. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824b2e3e. This was a large healthcare database review of 32.9 million women between ages of 18 and 64 from 2000 to 2009. This review found that 182,110 stress urinary incontinence procedures were performed. During this period, there was found to be a large increase in the number of slings performed and a decrease in Burch procedures.
Gleason JL, Parden AM, Jauk V, Ballard A, Sung V, Richter H. Outcomes of mid-urethral sling procedures in women with mixed urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:715–20. doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2580-x.
Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Burgio KL, Chai TC, Clemens Q, Culkin DJ,Kumar A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neruogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline. 2012. Amended 2014.
• Jain P, Jirschele K, Botros SM, Latthe PM. Effectiveness of mid-urethral slings in mixed urinary incontinence: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:923–32. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1406-3. This is a systematic literature review of randomized control trials and prospective studies that evaluated the effectiveness of mid-urethral slings in the mixed urinary incontinence population prior to 2011. They found the cure rate of the urge component to be variable (30–85%) and less than the stress component. It was found that the cure rate did not persist over time.
Kenton K, Stoddard AM, Zyczynski H, Albo M, Rickey L, Norton P, et al. 5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings. J Urol. 2015;193:203–10. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.089.
Lee EW, Nitti VW, Brucker BM. Mid-urethral slings for all stress incontinence. Urol Clin N Am. 2012;39:299–310. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2012.05.0030094-0143/12/$.
Lee JK-S, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Lim YN, Polyakov A, Stav K. Persistence of urgency and urge urinary incontinence in women with mixed urinary symptoms after mid-urethral slings: a multivariate analysis. BJOG. 2011;118:798–805. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02915.x.
Miranne JM, Lopes V, Carberry CL, Sung VW. The effect of pelvic organ prolapse severity on improvement in overactive bladder symptoms after pelvic reconstruction surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1303. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-2000-z.
Palva K, Nilsson CG. Prevalence of urinary urgency symptoms decreases by mid-urethral sling procedures for the treatment of stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1241–7. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1511-3.
• Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls L, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator mid-urethral slings for stress incontinence. N Eng J Med. 2010;362:2066–76. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0912658. This is a multicenter, randomized equivalence trial comparing retropubic and transobturator slings. A total of 565 women completed a 12-month assessment. The objectively assessed success of treatment for stress urinary incontinence met criteria for equivalence for the two techniques. There were no significant differences in postoperative urge incontinence and quality of life. Retropubic sling patients had more complaints of postoperative voiding dysfunction while the transobturator sling patients had more neurologic symptoms.
Sajadi KP, Vasavada SP. Overactive bladder after sling surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2010;11:366–71. doi:10.1007/s11934-010-0136-2.
Scarpero H. Outcomes of mixed urinary incontinence surgery: a fresh look at an old dilemma. J Urol. 2008;179:15–6. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.005.
Wai CY, Curto TM, Zyczynski HM, Stoddard AM, Burgio KL, Brubaker L, et al. Patient satisfaction following mid-urethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:1009–16. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828ca49e.
Weissbart S, Smith A, Andy U, Arya L. Pathophysiological relationship between pelvic organ prolapse and overactive bladder. J Uro 2016. e105. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2339.
Zyczynski HM, Albo ME, Goldman HB, Wai CY, Sirls LT, Brubaker L, et al. Change in overactive bladder symptoms after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:423–30. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000929.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Overactive Bladder
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Staley, S., Krall, M. & Bologna, R. Resolution of Overactive Bladder After Mid-Urethral Sling Placement With Mixed Incontinence. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep 12, 80–85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-017-0410-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-017-0410-y