Abstract
Functional and structural changes in the common carotid artery are biomarkers for cardiovascular risk. Current methods for measuring functional changes include pulse wave velocity, compliance, distensibility, strain, stress, stiffness, and elasticity derived from arterial waveforms. The review is focused on the ultrasound-based carotid artery elasticity and stiffness measurements covering the physics of elasticity and linking it to biological evolution of arterial stiffness. The paper also presents evolution of plaque with a focus on the pathophysiologic cascade leading to arterial hardening. Using the concept of strain, and image-based elasticity, the paper then reviews the lumen diameter and carotid intima-media thickness measurements in combined temporal and spatial domains. Finally, the review presents the factors which influence the understanding of atherosclerotic disease formation and cardiovascular risk including arterial stiffness, tissue morphological characteristics, and image-based elasticity measurement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131:29–322.
Pagidipati NJ, Gaziano TA. Estimating deaths from cardiovascular disease: a review of global methodologies of mortality measurement. Circulation. 2013;127:749–56.
Schmidt R, Lauter J. MyHeart: fighting cardio-vascular diseases by preventive lifestyle and early diagnosis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;117:51–9.
Suri JS, Kathuria C, Molinari F. Atherosclerosis disease management. Springer; 2011
• Boesen ME, Singh D, Menon BK, Frayne R. A systematic literature review of the effect of carotid atherosclerosis on local vessel stiffness and elasticity. Atherosclerosis. 2015;243:211–22. This article exhibits the effect of carotid atherosclerotic plaque on local arterial stiffness.
Gamble G, Zorn J, Sanders G, MacMahon S, Sharpe N. Estimation of arterial stiffness, compliance, and distensibility from M-mode ultrasound measurements of the common carotid artery. Stroke. 1994;25:11–6.
Lechareas S, Yanni A, Golemati S, Chatziioannou A, Perrea D. Ultrasound and biochemical diagnostic tools for the characterization of vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;42:31–43.
Yuan LJ, Xue D, Duan YY, Coa TS, Yang HG, Zhou N. Carotid arterial intima–media thickness and arterial stiffness in pre-eclampsia: analysis with a radiofrequency Ultrasound technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:644–52.
Zhang L, Yin JK, Duan YY, Liu X, Xu L, Wang J, et al. Evaluation of carotid artery elasticity changes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:1–10.
Bianchini E, Gemignani V, Faita F, Giannarelli C, Ghiadoni L, Demi M, et al. Assessment of carotid stiffness and intima-media thickness from ultrasound data: comparison between two methods. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1169–75.
Blacher J, Asmar R, Djane S, London GM, Safar ME. Aortic pulse wave velocity as a marker of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 1999;33:1111–7.
Mattace-Raso FUS, van der Cammen TJM, Hofman A, van Popele NM, Bos ML, Schalekamp MADH, et al. Arterial stiffness and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the Rotterdam study. Circulation. 2006;113:657–63.
Greenwald SE. Pulse pressure and arterial elasticity. Q J Med. 2002;95:107–12.
Antonini-Canterin F, Roşca M, Beladan CC, Popescu BA, Piazza R, Leiballi E, et al. Echo-tracking assessment of carotid artery stiffness in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Echocardiography. 2009;26:823–31.
Gimbrone Jr MA, Cybulsky MI, Kume N, Collins T, Resnick N. Vascular endothelium: an integrator of pathophysiological stimuli in atherogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;748:122–31.
Hansson GK, Libby P, Tabas I. Inflammation and plaque vulnerability. J Intern Med. 2015;278:483–93.
Ross R. Cell Biology of atherosclerosis. Annu Rev Physiol. 1995;57:791–804.
Tabas I, Williams KJ, Borén J. Subendothelial lipoprotein retention as the initiating process in atherosclerosis: update and therapeutic implications. Circulation. 2007;116:1832–44.
Luthra K, Mishra A, Srivastava LM. Lipoprotein(a): biology and role in atherosclerotic vascular diseases. Curr Sci. 1999;76:1553–60.
•• Libby P, Ridker PM PM, Hansson GK. Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature. 2011;473:317–25. This article discusses the pathophysiological formation of the atherosclerotic plaque.
Raines EW, Ferri N. Thematic review series: the immune system and atherogenesis, cytokines affecting endothelial and smooth muscle cells in vascular disease. J Lipid Res. 2005;46:1081–92.
Arroyo LH, Lee RT. Mechanisms of plaque rupture: mechanical and biologic interactions. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;41:369–75.
Teng Z, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Feng J, Yuan J, Lu Q, et al. Material properties of components in human carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a uniaxial extension study. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:5055–63.
Cohn JN, Colucci W. Cardiovascular effects of aldosterone and post-acute myocardial infarction pathophysiology. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:4–12.
Tracqui P, Broisat A, Toczek J, Mesnier N, Ohayon J, Riou L. Mapping elasticity moduli of atherosclerotic plaque in situ via atomic force microscopy. J Struct Biol. 2011;174:115–23.
Geng YJ, Libby P. Evidence for apoptosis in advanced human atheroma: co-localization with interleukin-1-converting enzyme. Am J Pathol. 1995;147:251–66.
Isner JM, Kearney M, Bortman S, Passeri J. Apoptosis in human atherosclerosis and restenosis. Circulation. 1995;91:2703–11.
Geng YJ, Wu Q, Muszynski M, Libby P. Apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells induced by in vitro stimulation with interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-1-beta. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:19–27.
Bruel A, Oxlund H. Changes in biomechanical properties, composition of collagen and elastin, and advanced glycation endproducts of the rat aorta in relation to age. Atherosclerosis. 1996;127:155–65.
Cheung YF, Wong SJ, Ho MH. Relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and arterial stiffness in children after Kawasaki disease. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92:43–7.
Cheung YF, Chow PC, Chan GC, Ha SY. Carotid intima media thickness is increased and related to arterial stiffening in patients with beta-thalassaemiamajor. Br J Haematol. 2006;135:732–34.
Zhang L, Yin JK, Duan YY, Liu X, Xu L, Wang J, et al. Evaluation of carotid artery elasticity changes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014. doi:10.1186/1475-2840-13-39.
•• Selzer RH, Mack WJ, Lee PL, Kwong-Fu H, Hodis HN. Improved common carotid elasticity and intima-media thickness measurements from computer analysis of sequential ultrasound frames. Atherosclerosis. 2011;154:185–93. The article uses computerized edge tracking method for carotid arterial diameter and carotid intima-media thickness measurement in multiple frames of the cardiac cycle.
Avolio AP, Chen SG, Wang RP, Zhang CL, Li MF, O’Rourke MF. Effects of aging on changing arterial compliance and left ventricular load in a northern Chinese urban community. Circulation. 1983;68:50–8.
Huang X, Kang X, Xue J, Kang C, Lv H, Li Z. Evaluation of carotid artery elasticity changes in patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:18825–30.
Laurent S, Katsahian S, Fassot C, Tropeano AI, Gautier I, Laloux B, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of fatal stroke in essential hypertension. Stroke. 2003;34:1203–6.
Callaghan FJ, Geddes LA, Babba CF, Bourland JD. Relationship between pulse-wave velocity and arterial elasticity. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1986;24:248–54.
Soleimani E, Mokhtari-Dizaji M, Saberi H. A novel non-invasive ultrasonic method to assess total axial stress of the common carotid wall in healthy and atherosclerotic men. J Biomech. 2015;48:1860–7.
Meaume S, Benetos A, Henry OF. Aortic pulse wave velocity predicts cardiovascular mortality in subjects >70 years of age. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:2046–50.
Farrar DJ, Green HD, Bond MG, Wagner WD, Gobbeé RA. Aortic pulse wave velocity, elasticity, and composition in a nonhuman primate model of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 1978;43:52–62.
Cinthio M, Ahlgren AR, Bergkvist J, Jansson T, Persson HW, Lindström K. Longitudinal movements and resulting shear strain of the arterial wall. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291:394–402.
Svedlund S, Gan LM. Longitudinal wall motion of the common carotid artery can be assessed by velocity vector imaging. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2011;31:32–8.
Oates CP, Naylor AR, Hartshorne T, Charles SM, Fail T, Humphries K, et al. Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:251–61.
Wong CB, Wong JC. A novel method to quantify carotid artery stenosis by Doppler ultrasound: Using the continuity principle. Int J Angiol. 2010;19:86–90.
Shapiro GL, Stockman CG. Computer Vision. 1st ed. Pearson; 2000.
Destrempes F, Meunier J, Giroux MF, Soulez G, Cloutier G. Segmentation in ultrasonic B-mode images of healthy carotid arteries using mixtures of nakagami distributions and stochastic optimization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28:215–29.
Haas C, Ermert H, Holt S, Grewe P, Machraoui A, Barmeyer J. Segmentation of 3-D intravascular ultrasonic images based on a random field model. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26:297–306.
Francois O. Global optimization with exploration/selection algorithms and simulated annealing. Ann Appl Probab. 2002;12:248–71.
Molinari F, Zeng G, Suri JS. An integrated approach to computer-based automated tracing and its validation for 200 common carotid arterial wall ultrasound images: a new technique. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:399–418.
Seabra JC, Ciompi F, Pujol O, Mauri J, Radeva P, Sanches J. Rayleigh mixture model for plaque characterization in intravascular ultrasound. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58:1314–24.
Menchon-Lara RM, Bastida-Jumilla MC, Morales-Sanchez J, Sancho-Gomez JL. Automatic detection of the intima-media thickness in ultrasound images of the common carotid artery using neural networks. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2014;52:169–81.
Carvalho DDB, Akkus Z, Van den Oord SCH, Schinkel AFL, Van der Steen AFW, Niessen WJ, et al. Lumen segmentation and motion estimation in B-mode and contrast-enhanced ultrasound images of the carotid artery in patients with atherosclerotic plaque. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34:883–93.
Jayaram S, Esakkirajan S, Veerakumar T. Digital image processing. 1st ed. Tata McGraw-Hill Education; 2009.
Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D. Snakes: active contours models. Int J Comput Vis. 1988;4:321–31.
Suri JS, Farah A. Deformable models volumes I and II: biomedical and clinical applications (Topics in biomedical engineering). 1st ed. Springer; 2007.
Loizou CP, Pattichis CS, Pantziaris M, Tyllis T, Nicolaides A. Snakes based segmentation of the common carotid artery intima media. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2007;45:35–49.
Molinari F, Meiburger KM, Zeng G, Nicolaides A, Suri JS. CAUDLES-EF: carotid automated ultrasound double line extraction system using edge flow. J Digit Imaging. 2011;24:1059–77.
Golemati S, Stoitsis J, Sifakis EG, Balkizas T, Nikita KS. Using the Hough transform to segment ultrasound images of longitudinal and transverse sections of the carotid artery. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:918–32.
Liang Q, Wendelhag I, Wikstrand J, Gustavsson T. A multiscale dynamic programming procedure for boundary detection in ultrasonic artery images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000;19:127–42.
Meiburger KM, Molinari F, Acharya UR, Saba L, Rodrigues P, Liboni W, et al. Automated carotid artery intima layer regional segmentation. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:4073–90.
Ilea DE, Duffy C, Kavanagh L, Stanton A, Whelan PF. Fully automated segmentation and tracking of the intima media thickness in ultrasound video sequences of the common carotid artery. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013;60:158–77.
Kanber B, Ramnarine KV. A probabilistic approach to computerized tracking of arterial walls in ultrasound image sequences. Int Sch Res Netw (ISRN). 2012. doi:10.5402/2012/179087.
Chen Y, Peng B, Liu DC. Fully automated intima media thickness measurement of posterior wall in longitudinal ultrasound B-mode scans. Int J Signal Process Image Process Pattern Recog. 2014;7:9–18.
Touboul PJ, Prati P, Scarabin PY, Adrai V, Thibout E, Ducimetiere P. Use of monitoring software to improve the measurement of carotid wall thickness by B-mode imaging. J Hypertens. 1992;10:37–41.
Molinari F, Meiburger KM, Zeng G, Acharya UR, Liboni W, Nicolaides A, et al. Carotid artery recognition system: a comparison of three automated paradigms for ultrasound images. Med Phys. 2012;39:378–91.
• Molinari F, Zeng G, Suri JS. A state of the art review on intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement and wall segmentation techniques for carotid ultrasound. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2010;100:201–21. The paper presents review different methods for lumen-intima and mediaadventitia boundary segmentation techniques such as: dynamic programming, local statistics, edge-detection, active contours, statistical modelling, Hough transform, and hybrid techniques. It also discusses about carotid IMT measurement techniques.
Meiburger KM, Molinari F, Zeng G, Saba L, Suri JS. Carotid automated ultrasound double line extraction system (CADLES) via Edge-Flow. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090107.
Suri JS. Computer vision, pattern recognition and image processing in left ventricle segmentation: the last 50 years. Pattern Anal Applic. 2000;3:209–42.
El-Baz A, Gimel’farb D, Suri JS. Stochastic modeling for medical image analysis. 1st ed. CRC Press; 2015.
Molinari F, Meiburger KM, Acharya UR, Zeng G, Rodrigues PS, Saba L, et al. CARES 3.0: a two stage system combining feature-based recognition and edge-based segmentation for CIMT measurement on a multi-instititional ultrasound database of 300 images. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091275.
Hassan M, Chaudhry A, Khan A, Iftikhar MA. Robust information gain based fuzzy c-means clustering and classification of carotid artery ultrasound images. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2014;113:593–609.
Rocha R, Campilho A, Silva J, Azevedo E, Santos R. Segmentation of ultrasound images of the carotid using RANSAC and cubic splines. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2011;101:94–106.
Yamagishi T, Kato M, Koiwa Y, Hasegawa H, Kanai H. Impact of lifestyle-related diseases on carotid arterial wall elasticity as evaluated by an ultrasonic phased-tracking method in Japanese subjects. J Med Ultrason. 2009;16:782–92.
Araki T, Ikeda N, Dey N, Chakraborty S, Saba L, Kumar D, et al. A comparative approach of four different image registration techniques for quantitative assessment of coronaryartery calcium lesions using intravascular ultrasound. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2015;118:158–72.
Zhang P, Guo R, Xiao D, Chu S, Gong L, Zhang C, et al. Influence of smoking cessation on carotid artery wall elasticity evaluated by echo-tracking. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012;40:352–6.
Apostolakis IZ, Gastounioti A, Golemati S, Nikita KS. Ultrasound-image-based displacement and strain maps of the human carotid artery using weighted-least-squares optical flow. IEEE Int Conf Imaging Syst Tech (IST). 2012. doi:10.1109/IST.2012.6295565.
Saba L, Molinari F, Meiburger KM, Piga M, Zeng G, Rajendra Achraya U, et al. What is the correct distance measurement metric when measuring carotid ultrasound intima-media thickness automatically? Int Angiol. 2012;31:483–9.
Molinari F, Meiburger KM, Zeng G, Saba L, Rajendra Acharya U, Famiglietti L, et al. Automated carotid IMT measurement and its validation in low contrast ultrasound database of 885 patient Indian population epidemiological study: results of AtheroEdge™ Software. Int Angiol. 2012;31:42–53.
Huttenlocher DP, Klanderman GA, Rucklidge WJ. Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1993;15:850–63.
Thacher T, Gambillara V, da Silva RF, Silacci P, Stergiopulos N. Reduced cyclic stretch, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress: an ex vivo model. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2010;19:91–8.
Palombo C, Kozakova M. Arterial stiffness, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk: pathophysiologic mechanisms and emerging clinical indications. Vasc Pharmacol. 2015;15:332–68.
Cardoso L, Kelly-Arnold A, Maldonado N, Laudier D, Weinbaum S. Effect of the tissue properties, shape and orientation of micro calcification on vulnerable cap stability using different hyperelastic constitutive models. J Biomech. 2014;47:870–7.
Gronholdt ML, Nordestgaard BG, Bentzon J, Wiebe BM, Zhou J, Falk E, et al. Macrophages are associated with lipid-rich carotid artery plaques, echolucency on B-mode imaging, and elevated plasma lipid levels. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:137–45.
Packard RRS, Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: from vascular biology to biomarker discovery and risk prediction. Clin Chem. 2008;54:24–38.
Sehgel NL, Sun Z, Hong Z, Hunter WC, Hill MA, Vatner DE, et al. Augmented vascular smooth muscle cell stiffness and adhesion when hypertension is superimposed on aging. Hypertension. 2015;65:370–7.
Pahkala K, Hernelahti M, Heinonen OJ, Raittinen P, Hakanen M, Lagström H, et al. Body mass index, fitness and physical activity from childhood through adolescence. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:71–7.
Cecelja M, Chowienczyk P. Dissociation of aortic pulse wave velocity with risk factors for cardiovascular disease other than hypertension: a systematic review. Hypertension. 2009;54:1328–36.
Miyamoto M, Kotani K, Okada K, Ando A, Hasegawa H, Kanai H, et al. Arterial wall elasticity measured using the phased tracking method and atherosclerotic risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013;20:678–87.
• Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Lacolley P. Structural and genetic bases of arterial stiffness. Hypertension. 2005;45:1050–5. The paper talks about biological factors responsible for arterial stiffness. This change in stiffness has association with the genetic components.
Mahmud A, Feely J. Effect of smoking on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure amplification. Hypertension. 2003;41:183–7.
Simons PC, Algra A, Bots ML, Grobbee DE, van der Graaf Y. Common carotid intima-media thickness and arterial stiffness indicators of cardiovascular risk in high-risk patients. Circulation. 1999;100:951–7.
Zahnd G, Orkisz M, Sérusclat A, Moulin P, Vray D. Simultaneous extraction of carotid artery intima-media interfacesin ultrasound images: assessment of wall thickness temporal variation during the cardiac cycle. Int J CARS. 2014;9:645–58.
Niu L, Qian M, Song R, Meng L, Liu X, Zheng H. A texture matching method considering geometric transformations in noninvasive ultrasonic measurement of arterial elasticity. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:524–33.
Hasegawa H, Kanai H, Hoshimiya N, Koiwa Y. Evaluating the regional elastic modulus of a cylindrical shell with nonuniform wall thickness. J Med Ultrason. 2004;31:81–90.
Pahkala K, Laitinen TT, Heinonen J, Viikari JSA, Rönnemaa T, Niinikoski H, et al. Association of fitness with vascular intima-media thickness and elasticity in adolescence. Pediatrics. 2013;132:77–84.
Mitchell GF, Hwang SJ, Vasan RS, Larson MG, Pencina MJ, Hamburg NM, et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2010;4:505–11.
Saba L, Meiburger KM, Molinari F, Ledda G, Anzidei M, Acharya UR, et al. Carotid IMT variability (IMTV) and its validation in symptomatic versus asymptomatic Italian population: can this be a useful index for studying symptomaticity? Echocardiography. 2012;29(9):1111–9.
Saba L, Banchhor SK, Suri HS, Londhe ND, Araki T, Ikeda N, et al. Accurate cloud-based smart IMT measurement, its validation and stroke risk stratification in carotid ultrasound: a web-based point-of-care tool for multicenter clinical trial. Comput Biol Med. 2016;75:217–34.
Contributions
Anoop K. Patel, MTech: Design of the manuscript pursing doctoral degree.
Harman S. Suri: Support in the design of the manuscript.
Jaskaran Singh, BTech: Support in the design of the manuscript.
Dinesh Kumar, PhD: Support in the design of the manuscript.
Shoaib Shafique, MD: Supported in clinical application and risk scores.
Andrew Nicolaides, PhD: Clinical advisor and discussions on carotid imaging.
Sanjay K. Jain, PhD: Advising and support in arranging information technology resources.
Luca Saba, MD: Clinical discussions and data collection.
Ajay Gupta, MD: Input in stroke and clinical component of the manuscript.
John R. Laird, MD: Clinical advisor for link between carotid and coronary.
Argiris Giannopoulos, MD; AVI carotid cine loop collection, demographics and library support.
Jasjit S. Suri, PhD, MBA, Fellow AIMBE: Principal Investigator of the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Jasjit S. Suri (PI of this project) has a relationship with AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA which is dedicated to Atherosclerosis Disease Management, including Stroke and Cardiovascular imaging.
Anoop K. Patel, Harman S. Suri, Jaskaran Singh, Dinesh Kumar, Shoaib Shafique, Andrew Nicolaides, Sanjay K. Jain, Luca Saba, Ajay Gupta, John R. Laird, and Argiris Giannopoulos declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Vascular Biology
Appendix A
Appendix A
where d is the distance measured between carotid to femoral arterial sites.
Thus, Young’s elastic modulus Y m is expressed as:
where IMT Y m , ρ and r are intima-media thickness, YEM, density of fluid within the lumen and lumen radius, respectively.
where D max is the maximum artery diameter and D min is the minimum artery diameter.
Peterson’s Elastic Module (E p ) can be expressed as:
where PP is the pulse pressure and DD is the as in Eq. (4).
where σcs is the circumferential stress, \( IM{T}_{D_{min}} \) is the IMT measured at the instance when arterial diameter was minimum in the far wall.
If \( {E}_p=\frac{PP}{DD} \) (Peterson’s elastic modulus), then Y m can be expressed in terms of Peterson’s elastic modulus (E p ) as:
Distensibility DIS can be represented as:
where DD sr = \( \left[\frac{\left({D}_{\max}^2 - {D}_{\min}^2\right)}{D_{\min}^2}\right] \), PP is the pulse pressure; D max is the maximum diameter of artery and D min is the minimum diameter of artery.
where, \( \frac{\varDelta L}{L_d} \) is expressed in terms of IMT, LD and arterial compressibility. It is mathematically represented as in Eq. 12:
and L d , D s , D d , PP, δ, IMT d, and IMT s are diastolic length of cylindrical artery, systolic diameter, diastolic diameter, pulse pressure, compressibility factor, diastolic IMT and systolic IMT, respectively. δ can be expressed as:
where V d and V s is volume of vessel wall in diastole, systole, respectively. V s and V d can be computed using Eq. 14 as:
where L s is the systolic length of cylindrical artery, D s and D d are the diastolic and systolic diameter, respectively.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patel, A.K., Suri, H.S., Singh, J. et al. A Review on Atherosclerotic Biology, Wall Stiffness, Physics of Elasticity, and Its Ultrasound-Based Measurement. Curr Atheroscler Rep 18, 83 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-016-0635-9
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-016-0635-9