Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging Atherosclerotic Plaque Calcification: Translating Biology

  • Vascular Biology (J. Hamilton, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calcification of atherosclerotic lesions was long thought to be an age - related, passive process, but increasingly data has revealed that atherosclerotic calcification is a more active process, involving complex signaling pathways and bone-like genetic programs. Initially, imaging of atherosclerotic calcification was limited to gross assessment of calcium burden, which is associated with total atherosclerotic burden and risk of cardiovascular mortality and of all cause mortality. More recently, sophisticated molecular imaging studies of the various processes involved in calcification have begun to elucidate information about plaque calcium composition and consequent vulnerability to rupture, leading to hard cardiovascular events like myocardial infarction. As such, there has been renewed interest in imaging calcification to advance risk assessment accuracy in an evolving era of precision medicine. Here we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the biologic process of atherosclerotic calcification as well as some of the molecular imaging tools used to assess it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Mankoff DA. A definition of molecular imaging. J Nucl Med: Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2007;48:18N–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hjortnaes J, New SE, Aikawa E. Visualizing novel concepts of cardiovascular calcification. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2013;23:71–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Demer LL, Tintut Y. Vascular calcification: pathobiology of a multifaceted disease. Circulation. 2008;117:2938–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Morrison AR, Wu JC, Sadeghi MM. Cardiovascular molecular imaging. In: Iskandrian AE, Garcia EV, editors. Nuclear cardiac imaging. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016. p. 601–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. New SE, Goettsch C, Aikawa M, Marchini JF, Shibasaki M, Yabusaki K, et al. Macrophage-derived matrix vesicles: an alternative novel mechanism for microcalcification in atherosclerotic plaques. Circ Res. 2013;113:72–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Otsuka F, Sakakura K, Yahagi K, Joner M, Virmani R. Has our understanding of calcification in human coronary atherosclerosis progressed? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:724–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Towler DA, Demer LL. Thematic series on the pathobiology of vascular calcification: an introduction. Circ Res. 2011;108:1378–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Aikawa E, Nahrendorf M, Figueiredo JL, Swirski FK, Shtatland T, Kohler RH, et al. Osteogenesis associates with inflammation in early-stage atherosclerosis evaluated by molecular imaging in vivo. Circulation. 2007;116:2841–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Radcliff K, Tang TB, Lim J, Zhang Z, Abedin M, Demer LL, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-I regulates proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of calcifying vascular cells via extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathways. Circ Res. 2005;96:398–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tintut Y, Patel J, Territo M, Saini T, Parhami F, Demer LL. Monocyte/macrophage regulation of vascular calcification in vitro. Circulation. 2002;105:650–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Aly Z, Shao JS, Lai CF, Huang E, Cai J, Behrmann A, et al. Aortic Msx2-Wnt calcification cascade is regulated by TNF-alpha-dependent signals in diabetic Ldlr−/− mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:2589–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li X, Yang HY, Giachelli CM. BMP-2 promotes phosphate uptake, phenotypic modulation, and calcification of human vascular smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis. 2008;199:271–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sage AP, Tintut Y, Demer LL. Regulatory mechanisms in vascular calcification. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:528–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Panizo S, Cardus A, Encinas M, Parisi E, Valcheva P, Lopez-Ongil S, et al. RANKL increases vascular smooth muscle cell calcification through a RANK-BMP4-dependent pathway. Circ Res. 2009;104:1041–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shanahan CM. Inflammation ushers in calcification: a cycle of damage and protection? Circulation. 2007;116:2782–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goettsch C, Hutcheson JD, Aikawa M, Iwata H, Pham T, Nykjaer A, et al. Sortilin mediates vascular calcification via its recruitment into extracellular vesicles. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:1323–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Proudfoot D, Skepper JN, Hegyi L, Bennett MR, Shanahan CM, Weissberg PL. Apoptosis regulates human vascular calcification in vitro: evidence for initiation of vascular calcification by apoptotic bodies. Circ Res. 2000;87:1055–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reynolds JL, Joannides AJ, Skepper JN, McNair R, Schurgers LJ, Proudfoot D, et al. Human vascular smooth muscle cells undergo vesicle-mediated calcification in response to changes in extracellular calcium and phosphate concentrations: a potential mechanism for accelerated vascular calcification in ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:2857–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kapustin AN, Davies JD, Reynolds JL, McNair R, Jones GT, Sidibe A, et al. Calcium regulates key components of vascular smooth muscle cell-derived matrix vesicles to enhance mineralization. Circ Res. 2011;109:e1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hecht HS. Coronary artery calcium scanning: past, present, and future. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2015;8:579–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wexler L. Gaining perspective on the risks of ionizing radiation for cardiac imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1490–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen J, Einstein AJ, Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, et al. Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:702–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, DeFilippis AP, Blankstein R, Rivera JJ, Agatston A, et al. Associations between C-reactive protein, coronary artery calcium, and cardiovascular events: implications for the JUPITER population from MESA, a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378:684–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Study of Inherited Risk of Coronary A, Reilly MP, Wolfe ML, Localio AR, Rader DJ. C-reactive protein and coronary artery calcification. The Study of Inherited Risk of Coronary Atherosclerosis (SIRCA). Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:1851–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Raggi P, Callister TQ, Shaw LJ. Progression of coronary artery calcium and risk of first myocardial infarction in patients receiving cholesterol-lowering therapy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:1272–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Raggi P, Cooil B, Shaw LJ, Aboulhson J, Takasu J, Budoff M, et al. Progression of coronary calcium on serial electron beam tomographic scanning is greater in patients with future myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:827–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Criqui MH, Denenberg JO, Ix JH, McClelland RL, Wassel CL, Rifkin DE, et al. Calcium density of coronary artery plaque and risk of incident cardiovascular events. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc. 2014;311:271–8. This article identifies calcium density as being inversely correlated to event risk, allowing for additional risk discrimination over traditional coronary calcium scores.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vengrenyuk Y, Carlier S, Xanthos S, Cardoso L, Ganatos P, Virmani R, et al. A hypothesis for vulnerable plaque rupture due to stress-induced debonding around cellular microcalcifications in thin fibrous caps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:14678–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:C13–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, Sugiura A, Harigaya H, Sato T, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:319–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, Anno H, Inoue K, Hara T, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Puchner SB, Liu T, Mayrhofer T, Truong QA, Lee H, Fleg JL, et al. High-risk plaque detected on coronary CT angiography predicts acute coronary syndromes independent of significant stenosis in acute chest pain: results from the ROMICAT-II trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:684–92. This is a critical study that demonstrates individual plaque features associated with qualitative CT-based calcium measures have predictive value for ACS in patients presenting with acute chest pain.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Mintz GS. Intravascular imaging of coronary calcification and its clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2015;8:461–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu L, Gardecki JA, Nadkarni SK, Toussaint JD, Yagi Y, Bouma BE, et al. Imaging the subcellular structure of human coronary atherosclerosis using micro-optical coherence tomography. Nat Med. 2011;17:1010–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1478–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Puri R, Tuzcu EM, Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ. Exploring coronary atherosclerosis with intravascular imaging. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:670–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Puri R, Nicholls SJ, Shao M, Kataoka Y, Uno K, Kapadia SR, et al. Impact of statins on serial coronary calcification during atheroma progression and regression. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:1273–82. This article provides a critical proof of principal for the role of serial intravascular ultrasound imaging in studying plaque biology. It demonstrates that statins promote coronary atheroma calcification, revealing potential insights into the plaque-stabilizing effects of statins.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Calfon MA, Rosenthal A, Mallas G, Mauskapf A, Nudelman RN, Ntziachristos V and Jaffer FA. In vivo near infrared fluorescence (NIRF) intravascular molecular imaging of inflammatory plaque, a multimodal approach to imaging of atherosclerosis. J Vis Exp. 2011.

  39. Zaheer A, Murshed M, De Grand AM, Morgan TG, Karsenty G, Frangioni JV. Optical imaging of hydroxyapatite in the calcified vasculature of transgenic animals. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:1132–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kooi ME, Cappendijk VC, Cleutjens KB, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, Borgers M, et al. Accumulation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in human atherosclerotic plaques can be detected by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2003;107:2453–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ruehm SG, Corot C, Vogt P, Kolb S, Debatin JF. Magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaque with ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation. 2001;103:415–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Silvera SS, Aidi HE, Rudd JH, Mani V, Yang L, Farkouh M, et al. Multimodality imaging of atherosclerotic plaque activity and composition using FDG-PET/CT and MRI in carotid and femoral arteries. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207:139–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Henkelman RM, Watts JF, Kucharczyk W. High signal intensity in MR images of calcified brain tissue. Radiology. 1991;179:199–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bitar R, Moody AR, Symons S, Leung G, Crisp S, Kiss A, et al. Carotid atherosclerotic calcification does not result in high signal intensity in MR imaging of intraplaque hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1403–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hallock KJ, Hamilton JA. Ex vivo identification of atherosclerotic plaque calcification by a 31P solid-state magnetic resonance imaging technique. Magn Reson Med: Off J Soc Magn Reson Med/Soc Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:1380–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Turan TN, Rumboldt Z, Granholm AC, Columbo L, Welsh CT, Lopes-Virella MF, et al. Intracranial atherosclerosis: correlation between in-vivo 3T high resolution MRI and pathology. Atherosclerosis. 2014;237:460–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Tawakol A, Migrino RQ, Bashian GG, Bedri S, Vermylen D, Cury RC, et al. In vivo 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging provides a noninvasive measure of carotid plaque inflammation in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1818–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tahara N, Kai H, Ishibashi M, Nakaura H, Kaida H, Baba K, et al. Simvastatin attenuates plaque inflammation: evaluation by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1825–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tawakol A, Fayad ZA, Mogg R, Alon A, Klimas MT, Dansky H, et al. Intensification of statin therapy results in a rapid reduction in atherosclerotic inflammation: results of a multicenter fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography feasibility study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:909–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Demeure F, Hanin FX, Bol A, Vincent MF, Pouleur AC, Gerber B, et al. A randomized trial on the optimization of 18F-FDG myocardial uptake suppression: implications for vulnerable coronary plaque imaging. J Nucl Med: Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2014;55:1629–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Gaeta C, Fernandez Y, Pavia J, Flotats A, Artigas C, Deportos J, et al. Reduced myocardial 18F-FDG uptake after calcium channel blocker administration. Initial observation for a potential new method to improve plaque detection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:2018–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Derlin T, Toth Z, Papp L, Wisotzki C, Apostolova I, Habermann CR, et al. Correlation of inflammation assessed by 18F-FDG PET, active mineral deposition assessed by 18F-fluoride PET, and vascular calcification in atherosclerotic plaque: a dual-tracer PET/CT study. J Nucl Med: Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2011;52:1020–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dunphy MP, Freiman A, Larson SM, Strauss HW. Association of vascular 18F-FDG uptake with vascular calcification. J Nucl Med: Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2005;46:1278–84.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Meirelles GS, Gonen M, Strauss HW. 18F-FDG uptake and calcifications in the thoracic aorta on positron emission tomography/computed tomography examinations: frequency and stability on serial scans. J Thorac Imaging. 2011;26:54–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tavakoli S, Zamora D, Ullevig S, Asmis R. Bioenergetic profiles diverge during macrophage polarization: implications for the interpretation of 18F-FDG PET imaging of atherosclerosis. J Nucl Med: Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2013;54:1661–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Czernin J, Satyamurthy N, Schiepers C. Molecular mechanisms of bone 18F-NaF deposition. J Nucl Med: Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2010;51:1826–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Irkle A, Vesey AT, Lewis DY, Skepper JN, Bird JL, Dweck MR, et al. Identifying active vascular microcalcification by (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7495. This article demonstrates that 18F-NaF uptake is higher in sites of microcalcification relative to sites of macrocalcification, providing better discrimination high-risk plaque by calcium-based features.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Kelly-Arnold A, Maldonado N, Laudier D, Aikawa E, Cardoso L, Weinbaum S. Revised microcalcification hypothesis for fibrous cap rupture in human coronary arteries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:10741–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Joshi NV, Vesey AT, Williams MC, Shah AS, Calvert PA, Craighead FH, et al. 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial. Lancet. 2014;383:705–13. This article is the first to demonstrate that 18F-NaF PET coupled to CT can effectively identify and localize ruptured and high risk-plaque at the time of symptomatic presentation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice G., Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto Jr AM, Kastelein JJ, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ridker PM. The JUPITER trial: results, controversies, and implications for prevention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:279–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice G, Goff Jr DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D’Agostino RB, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, Bergeron J, Luc G, Averna M, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1489–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Open-Label Study of Long-Term Evaluation against LDLCI, Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Wiviott SD, Raal FJ, Blom DJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of evolocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1500–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, Chase AJ, Edwards RJ, Hughes LO, et al. Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1115–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ridker PM, Thuren T, Zalewski A, Libby P. Interleukin-1beta inhibition and the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events: rationale and design of the Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS). Am Heart J. 2011;162:597–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:793–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part II. Circulation. 2003;108:1772–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I. Circulation. 2003;108:1664–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan R. Morrison.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by Career Development Award Number 7IK2BX002527-02 from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Program (A.R.M.). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government. This work was also supported in part by an Actelion ENTELLIGENCE Young Investigator Award (A.R.M.).

Conflict of Interest

Grant Bailey, Judith Meadows, and Alan R. Morrison declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Vascular Biology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bailey, G., Meadows, J. & Morrison, A.R. Imaging Atherosclerotic Plaque Calcification: Translating Biology. Curr Atheroscler Rep 18, 51 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-016-0601-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-016-0601-6

Keywords

Navigation