Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implicit learning deficits among adults with developmental dyslexia

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate implicit learning processes among adults with developmental dyslexia (DD) using a visual linguistic artificial grammar learning (AGL) task. Specifically, it was designed to explore whether the intact learning reported in previous studies would also occur under conditions including minimal training and instructions that do not reveal the grammatical nature of the strings. Twenty-nine (14 DD and 15 typical development (TD)) adults were presented with letter sequences in the training phase and were asked to classify the test strings for their grammaticality. The results of the d′ measures in the implicit task indicated that learning had occurred for both groups, as the proportion of hits exceeded the proportion of false alarms. However, a significant difference was found between the groups in their learning measures, as TD readers performed significantly better than individuals with DD, supporting the assumption of a deficit in implicit sequential learning processes among individuals with DD. In order to examine whether the deficit found in the first experiment was indeed due to a deficit in implicit processes, a second experiment was designed in which explicit instructions were given during an AGL task. Results of the explicit task strengthen the assumption that the deficit is indeed specific to implicit sequential processes, as no difference between the groups was found when participants were aware of the existence of the grammar underlying the strings. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Cautionary statement for forensic use of DSM-5. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). doi:10.1176/appi.books .9780890425596.744053

  • Altmann, G., Dienes, Z. P., & Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2012). Statistical learning is related to reading ability in children and adults. Cognitive science, 36(2), 286–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, T. M., & Pothos, E. M. (2008). AGL StimSelect: software for automated selection of stimuli for artificial grammar learning. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 164–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, I. J., Romano, J. C., Howard, J. H., & Howard, D. V. (2008). Two forms of implicit learning in young adults with dyslexia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145(1), 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. C., & Dienes, Z. P. (1993). Implicit learning: theoretical and empirical issues. Hillsdale: England Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertels, J., Franco, A., & Destrebecqz, A. (2012). How implicit is visual statistical learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1425–1431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W. (1989). Defining dyslexia as a developmental language disorder. Annals of Dyslexia, 39(1), 50–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2009). Seeing and hearing in space and time: effects of modality and presentation rate on implicit statistical learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 561–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z., & Berry, D. (1997). Implicit learning: below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. L., Saffran, J. R., & Robe-Torres, K. (2009). Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(2), 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facoetti, A., Corradi, N., Ruffino, M., Gori, S., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Visual spatial attention and speech segmentation are both impaired in preschoolers at familial risk for developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia, 16(3), 226–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facoetti, A., Paganoni, P., Turatto, M., Marzola, V., & Mascetti, G. G. (2000). Visual-spatial attention in developmental dyslexia. Cortex, 36(1), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A. N., Ruffino, M., Lorusso, M. L., Cattaneo, C., Galli, R., et al. (2010). Multisensory spatial attention deficits are predictive of phonological decoding skills in developmental dyslexia. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 22(5), 1011–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folia, V., Udden, J., Forkstam, C., Ingvar, M., Hagoort, P., & Petersson, K. M. (2008). Implicit learning and dyslexia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145(1), 132–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forkstam, C., Hagoort, P., Fernandez, G., Ingvar, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2006). Neural correlates of artificial syntactic structure classification. NeuroImage, 32(2), 956–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forkstam, C., & Petersson, K. M. (2005). Syntactic classification of acquired structural regularities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society.

  • Franceschini, S., Gori, S., Ruffino, M., Pedrolli, K., & Facoetti, A. (2012). A causal link between visual spatial attention and reading acquisition. Current Biology, 22(9), 814–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, S., Gori, S., Ruffino, M., Viola, S., Molteni, M., & Facoetti, A. (2013). Action video games make dyslexic children read better. Current Biology, 23(6), 462–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., & Pfeifer, E. (2002). Brain signatures of artificial language processing: evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(1), 529–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Siegelman, N., Narkiss, A., & Afek, L. (2013). What predicts successful literacy acquisition in a second language? Psychological Science, 24(7), 1243–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabay, Y., Schiff, R., & Vakil, E. (2012). Dissociation between the procedural learning of letter names and motor sequences in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia.

  • Gerken, L., Wilson, R., & Lewis, W. (2005). Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories. Journal of child language, 32(2), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gombert, J.-E. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning to read: implication as for subtypes of dyslexia. Current Psychology Letters. Behaviour, Brain and Cognition, 10(1), No pagination specified.

  • Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70(2), 109–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gori, S., Cecchini, P., Bigoni, A., Molteni, M., & Facoetti, A. (2014). Magnocellular-dorsal pathway and sub-lexical route in developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8.

  • Gori, S., Mascheretti, S., Giora, E., Ronconi, L., Ruffino, M., Quadrelli, E., et al. (2015). The DCDC2 intron 2 deletion impairs illusory motion perception unveiling the selective role of magnocellular-dorsal stream in reading (dis) ability. Cerebral Cortex, 25(6), 1685–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2015a). Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: three challenges for research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2015b). Visual attention span deficits and assessing causality in developmental dyslexia. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 225–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunow, H., Spaulding, T. J., Gómez, R. L., & Plante, E. (2006). The effects of variation on learning word order rules by adults with and without language-based learning disabilities. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39(2), 158–170.

  • Habib, M. (2000). The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia an overview and working hypothesis. Brain, 123(12), 2373–2399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hachmann, W. M., Bogaerts, L., Szmalec, A., Woumans, E., Duyck, W., & Job, R. (2014). Short-term memory for order but not for item information is impaired in developmental dyslexia. Annals of dyslexia, 64(2), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. H., Howard, D. V., Japikse, K. C., & Eden, G. F. (2006). Dyslexics are impaired on implicit higher-order sequence learning, but not on implicit spatial context learning. Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1131–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ise, E., Arnoldi, C. J., Bartling, J., & Schulte-Korne, G. (2012). Implicit learning in children with spelling disability: evidence from artificial grammar learning. Journal of Neural Transmission, 119(9), 999–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhoff, A., De Bree, E., De Klerk, M., & Wijnen, F. (2013). Non-adjacent dependency learning in infants at familial risk of dyslexia. Journal of Child Language, 40(01), 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, A., & Assmann, A. (2000). Learning artificial grammars: No evidence for the acquisition of rules. Memory and Cognition, 28(8), 1321–1332.

  • Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 22(1), 169–181.

  • Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82(3), B101–B111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mealor, A. D., & Dienes, Z. (2011). Conscious and unconscious thought in artificial grammar learning. Consciousness and cognition, 21(2), 865–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiri, H. (2013). Implicit learning processes of compensated dyslexic and skilled adult readers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36(7), 939–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menghini, D., Hagberg, G. E., Caltagirone, C., Petrosini, L., & Vicari, S. (2006). Implicit learning deficits in dyslexic adults: an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 33(4), 1218–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mody, M., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Brady, S. (1997). Speech perception deficits in poor readers: auditory processing or phonological coding? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64(2), 199–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., Berry, E. L., Jenkins, I. H., Dean, P., & Brooks, D. J. (1999). Association of abnormal cerebellar activation with motor learning difficulties in dyslexic adults. The Lancet, 353(9165), 1662–1667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opitz, B., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Interactions of the hippocampal system and the prefrontal cortex in learning language-like rules. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1730–1737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersson, K. M., Forkstam, C., & Ingvar, M. (2004). Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca’s region. Cognitive Science, 28(3), 383–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pothos, E. M. (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pothos, E. M., & Kirk, J. (2004). Investigating learning deficits associated with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 10(1), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 6(6), 855–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(3), 219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S., & Allen, R. (1978). Analogic and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: a functionalist interpretation. Cognition, 6(3), 189–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S., Kassin, S. M., Lewis, S., & Cantor, G. (1980). On the relationship between implicit and explicit modes in the learning of a complex rule structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(5), 492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(5), 888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russeler, J., Gerth, I., & Monte, T. F. (2006). Implicit learning is intact in adult developmental dyslexic readers: evidence from the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar learning. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(5), 808–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Tunick, R. A., & Barrueco, S. (1997). Incidental language learning: listening (and learning) out of the corner of your ear. Psychological Science, 8(2), 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Kahta, S. (2009a). Phonological awareness test battery. Hadad center: Bar-Iilan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Kahta, S. (2009b). Single word reading test: pointed and unpointed word reading. Hadad center: Bar-Ilan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., et al. (1998). Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(5), 2636–2641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: a regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. (2001). The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7(1), 12–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoodley, C. J., Harrison, E. P., & Stein, J. F. (2006). Implicit motor learning deficits in dyslexic adults. Neuropsychologia, 44(5), 795–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2007). The influence of working memory on reading growth in subgroups of children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(4), 249–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and language, 9(2), 182–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, D., Kiyokawa, S., Yamada, A., Dienes, Z., & Shigemasu, K. (2008). Role of selective attention in artificial grammar learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 15(6), 1154–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, C., Shanks, D., Henson, R., & Dolan, R. (2003). Neuronal correlates of familiarity-driven decisions in artificial grammar learning. Neuroreport, 14(1), 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomblin, J. B., Mainela-Arnold, E., & Zhang, X. (2007). Procedural learning in adolescents with and without specific language impairment. Language Learning and Development, 3(4), 269–293.

  • Vicari, S., Marotta, L., Menghini, D., Molinari, M., & Petrosini, L. (2003). Implicit learning deficit in children with developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 41(1), 108–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, P. H., Cohen, C., & Drake, C. (1984). Impaired motor timing control in specific reading retardation. Neuropsychologia, 22(5), 587–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, P. H., Michel, G. F., Ovrut, M., & Drake, C. (1990a). Rate and timing precision of motor coordination in developmental dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, P. H., Michel, G. F., & Ovrut, M. (1990b). Rate variables and automatized naming in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 39(4), 556–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel

    Shani Kahta & Rachel Schiff

Authors
  1. Shani Kahta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rachel Schiff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shani Kahta.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Table 3

Table 3 Training items and test items used in the classic AGL tasks
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kahta, S., Schiff, R. Implicit learning deficits among adults with developmental dyslexia. Ann. of Dyslexia 66, 235–250 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-016-0121-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-016-0121-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation