Abstract
Mathematics education reform, as conceptualized in the United States and a number of other countries, represents a fundamental change in the teaching of mathematics and the results it would produce for students. Whereas there are data that suggest some progress is being made in the direction of reform, teacher education and professional development during the last two decades have been largely unsuccessful in preparing teachers to enact the reform vision. In this article, I present a theoretical construct, major assimilatory structures, that can contribute to explaining the difficulty of promoting change in mathematics teaching. I describe a methodology—accounts of practice—for identifying major assimilatory structures of teachers and present an example of a major assimilatory structure, perception-based perspective, that emerged from our empirical work.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All people can be analyzed in terms of their assimilatory structures. In some cases it may be useful to characterize individuals or groups of individuals as having major assimilatory structures. These could be in the areas of religion, profession, parenthood and others. The key to such a claim is that the structure has wide impact and is resistant to change.
A parallel can be drawn with research on students’ mathematical conceptions. The mathematical understandings of the researchers contribute to what they can notice and the distinctions they can make. Researchers who do not understand the mathematics would not have the same abilities. In the case of pedagogical conceptions, how researchers understand learning and teaching is central to what they notice and distinctions they can make.
This is a way of expressing the underlying idea behind the assumption that everyone sees the same mathematical relationships in a given mathematical representation or situation.
As a teacher educator, I engage in and support these practices.
I extend my appreciation to the reviewer who raised this question.
References
Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject matter knowledge part of the equation. In: J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Teachers' subject matter knowledge and classroom instruction (Vol. 2, pp. 1–48). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bell, C., Wilson, S., Higgins, T., & McCoach, B. (2010). Measuring the effects of professional development on teacher knowledge: The case of Developing Mathematics Ideas. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 479–512.
Chapman, O., & Heater, B. (2010). Understanding change through a high school mathematics teacher’s journey to inquiry-based teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(6), 445–458.
Clements, D. H., & McMillen, S. (1996). Rethinking concrete manipulatives. Teaching Children Mathematics, 2(5), 270–279.
Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and school district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 2–33.
Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1991). An instruction-theoretical reflection on the use of manipulatives. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Realistic mathematics education in primary school (pp. 57–76). Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute.
Heinz, K., Kinzel, M., Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2000). Moving students through steps of mathematical knowing: An account of the practice of an elementary mathematics teacher in transition. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 83–107.
Jacobs, J. K., Hiebert, J., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Garnier, H., & Wearne, D. (2006). Does eighth-grade mathematics teaching in the United States align with the NCTM Standards? Results from the TIMSS 1995 and 1999 video studies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 5–32.
Kilpatrick, J. (2009). The mathematics teacher and curriculum change. PNA, 3(3), 107–121.
NCTM (2004). Rise in NAEP math scores coincides with NCTM standards. News Bulletin, January/February.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Commission on Teaching Standards for School Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Piaget, J. (1953). Origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Simon, M. A. (2000). Research on mathematics teacher development: The teacher development experiment. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 335–359). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Simon, M. (2008). The challenge of mathematics teacher education in an era of mathematics education reform. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education. The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 17–29). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Simon, M. A., Saldanha, L., McClintock, E., Karagoz Akar, G., Watanabe, T., & Ozgur Zembat, I. (2010). A developing approach to studying students’ learning through their mathematical activity. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 70–112.
Simon, M., & Tzur, R. (1999). Explicating the teacher’s perspective from the researchers’ perspective: Generating accounts of mathematics teachers’ practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 252–264.
Simon, M., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 91–104.
Simon, M., Tzur, R., Heinz, K., & Kinzel, M. (2004). Explicating a mechanism for conceptual learning: Elaborating the construct of reflective abstraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 305–329.
Simon, M., Tzur, R., Heinz, K., Kinzel, M., & Smith, M. (2000). Characterizing a perspective underlying the practice of mathematics teachers in transition. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 579–601.
Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 1–27.
Tzur, R., & Simon, M. A. (2004). Distinguishing two stages of mathematics conceptual learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 287–304.
Tzur, R., Simon, M. A., Heinz, K., & Kinzel, M. (2001). An account of a teacher’s perspective on learning and teaching mathematics: Implications for teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 227–254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simon, M.A. Promoting fundamental change in mathematics teaching: a theoretical, methodological, and empirical approach to the problem. ZDM Mathematics Education 45, 573–582 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0486-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0486-6