Abstract
We have explored how science and mathematics teachers made decisions when confronted with a dilemma in which a fictitious young woman, Deborah, may choose to have an operation that might address a painful spinal condition. We sought to explore the extent to which psychological heuristic models, in particular the Priority Heuristic, might successfully describe the decision-making process of these teachers and how an analysis of the role of personal and emotional factors in shaping the decision-making process might inform pedagogical design. A novel aspect of this study is that the setting in which the decision-making process is examined contrasts sharply with those used in psychological experiments. We found that to some extent, even in this contrasting setting, the Priority Heuristic could describe these teachers’ decision-making. Further analysis of the transcripts yielded some insights into limitations on scope as well the richness and complexity in how personal factors were brought to bear. We see these limitations as design opportunities for educational intervention.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293–1295.
Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica, 22, 23–36 (Original work published 1738).
Birnbaum, M. H. (2008). Evaluation of the Priority Heuristic as a descriptive model of risky decision making: Comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer and Hertwig (2006). Psychological Review, 115(1), 253–262.
Brandstätter, E., Gigerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2006). The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review, 113(2), 409–432.
Cokely, E., & Kelly, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgement and Decision Making, 4(1), 20–33.
Fiedler, K. (2010). How to study cognitive decision algorithms: The case of the priority heuristic. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(1), 21–32.
Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Friedman, M., & Savage, L. (1952). The expected utility hypothesis and the measurability of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 60, 463–474.
Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo Heuristics: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107–143.
Gigerenzer G., Odd, P. M., & The ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hilbig, B. E. (2008). One-reason decision making in risky choice? A closer look at the priority heuristic. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(6), 4–462.
Johnson, E. J., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., & Willemsen, M. C. (2008). Process models deserve process data: Comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006). Psychological Review, 115(1), 263–273.
Katsikopoulos, K. (2011). Psychological heuristics for making inferences: Definition, performance, and the emerging theory and practice. Decision Analysis, 8(1), 10–29.
Katsikopoulos, K., & Gigerenzer, G. (2008). One-reason decision-making: Modeling violations of EUT. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37(1), 35–56.
Levinson, R., Kent, P., Pratt, D., Kapadia, R., & Yogui, C. (2011). Developing a pedagogy of risk in socio-scientific issues. Journal of Biological Education, 45(3), 136–142.
Loewenstein, G., Weber, E., Hsee, C., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286.
Mongin, P. (1998). EUT. In J. Davis, D. Hands, & U. Mäki (Eds.), The handbook of economic methodology (pp. 342–350). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Pratt, D., Ainley, J., Kent, P., Levinson, R., Yogui, C., & Kapadia, R. (2011). Role of context in risk-based reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(4), 322–345.
Rieger, M. O., & Wang, M. (2008). What is behind the Priority Heuristic? A mathematical analysis. Psychological Review, 115(1), 274–280.
Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Dover.
Sunstein, C. (2003). Terrorism and probability neglect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(2–3), 121–136.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pratt, D., Levinson, R., Kent, P. et al. A pedagogic appraisal of the Priority Heuristic. ZDM Mathematics Education 44, 927–940 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0440-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0440-z