Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Epidemiology and treatment outcome of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia

  • Original Clinical Article
  • Published:
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

Abstract

Purpose

Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) is a rare disease. Epidemiological data are limited, and treatment of the condition is challenging. The purpose of our study was to gain epidemiological data on the incidence of CPT in Norway and to evaluate the treatment outcome of the disease.

Methods

During the period 1987–2006 22 patients with CPT were born in Norway (11 boys, 11 girls; mean age 15 years, age range 8–24 years) and are included in this study. During the same time period 1,183,380 live-births were registered by the Norwegian Birth Register. Primary surgical treatment was the Ilizarov method in 15 patients, intramedullary nailing in three patients, and plate osteosynthesis in two patients; two patients never developed a fracture and were treated with an orthosis.

Results

The incidence of CPT based on this period was 1:53,000. The rate of primary healing was 66 % for the Ilizarov group. Primary healing occurred in three patients treated with intramedullary nailing and in none of the patients treated with plate osteosynthesis. However, almost all patients required additional surgery due to refracture or deformity correction. Currently, all 12 skeletally mature patients are considered to be healed, whereas two of the skeletally immature patients are still under treatment.

Conclusion

The incidence of CPT in Norway seems to be notably higher than that based on epidemiological data from other studies. Primary healing rates are satisfactory when treated either with an Ilizarov device or intramedullary nailing. Refractures must be avoided, and alignment of the leg must be maintained. Healing is usually achieved before skeletal maturity. However, residual deformities are common.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hefti F (2008) Malformations of the lower extremities. Orthopade 37:381–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Paterson D (1989) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. An overview. Clin Orthop Relat Res 247:44–54

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herring J (2008) Disorders of the leg. In: Herring J (ed) Tachdjian’s pediatric orthopaedics. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen KS (1971) Occurrence of congenital tibial pseudoarthrosis in Denmark 1940–1965. Nord Med 86:1395

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersen KS (1976) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia and neurofibromatosis. Acta Orthop Scand 47:108–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldman DS, Jordan C, Fonseca L (2010) Orthopaedic manifestations of neurofibromatosis type 1. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:346–357

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crawford AH Jr, Bagamery N (1986) Osseous manifestations of neurofibromatosis in childhood. J Pediatr Orthop 6:72–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crawford AH, Schorry EK (1999) Neurofibromatosis in children: the role of the orthopaedist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 7:217–230

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hefti F, Bollini G, Dungl P et al (2000) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: history, etiology, classification, and epidemiologic data. J Pediatr Orthop B 9:11–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersen KS (1973) Radiological classification of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Acta Orthop Scand 44:719–727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Boyd HB, SAGE FP (1958) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Bone Jt Surg Am 40-A:1245–1270

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyd HB (1982) Pathology and natural history of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 166:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grill F, Bollini G, Dungl P et al (2000) Treatment approaches for congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia: results of the EPOS multicenter study. European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS). J Pediatr Orthop B 9:75–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boero S, Catagni M, Donzelli O et al (1997) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia associated with neurofibromatosis-1: treatment with Ilizarov’s device. J Pediatr Orthop 17:675–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi IH, Cho TJ, Moon HJ (2011) Ilizarov treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: a multi-targeted approach using the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Surg 3:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fabry G, Lammens J, Van MJ, Stuyck J (1988) Treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis with the Ilizarov technique. J Pediatr Orthop 8:67–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kristiansen LP, Steen H, Terjesen T (2003) Residual challenges after healing of congenital pseudarthrosis in the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:228–237

    Google Scholar 

  18. Romanus B, Bollini G, Dungl P et al (2000) Free vascular fibular transfer in congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia: results of the EPOS multicenter study. European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS). J Pediatr Orthop B 9:90–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dobbs MB, Rich MM, Gordon JE et al (2004) Use of an intramedullary rod for treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A:1186–1197

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ohnishi I, Sato W, Matsuyama J et al (2005) Treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: a multicenter study in Japan. J Pediatr Orthop 25:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (2012) The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo

  22. Paley D (2005) Principles of deformity correction. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carney BT, Daniels CL (2002) A retrospective review of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Iowa Orthop J 22:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cho TJ, Choi IH, Lee KS et al (2007) Proximal tibial lengthening by distraction osteogenesis in congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Pediatr Orthop 27:915–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnston CE (2002) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: results of technical variations in the Charnley–Williams procedure. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84-A:1799–1810

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen NH (2009) Use of an intramedullary Kirschner wire for treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 18:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Morrissy RT (1982) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Factors that affect results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 166:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patterson M (2006) Impact of external fixation on adolescents: an integrative research review. Orthop Nurs 25:300–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ippolito E, Corsi A, Grill F et al (2000) Pathology of bone lesions associated with congenital pseudarthrosis of the leg. J Pediatr Orthop B 9:3–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Iamaguchi RB, Fucs PM, da Carlos CA et al (2011) Congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia—results of treatment by free fibular transfer and associated procedures—preliminary study. J Pediatr Orthop B 20:323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Viehweger E, Pouliquen JC, Kassis B et al (1998) Bone growth after lengthening of the lower limb in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 7:154–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stevens PM, Kennedy JM, Hung M (2011) Guided growth for ankle valgus. J Pediatr Orthop 31:878–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Delgado-Martinez AD, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Olsen B (1996) Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Int Orthop 20:192–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Paley D, Catagni M, Argnani F et al (1992) Treatment of congenital pseudoarthrosis of the tibia using the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 280:81–93

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Children’s Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0027, Oslo, Norway

    Joachim Horn, Harald Steen & Terje Terjesen

Authors
  1. Joachim Horn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harald Steen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Terje Terjesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Horn.

About this article

Cite this article

Horn, J., Steen, H. & Terjesen, T. Epidemiology and treatment outcome of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Child Orthop 7, 157–166 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0477-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0477-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation