Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lattice Element Models and Their Peculiarities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the lattice element models, as a class of discrete models, in which the structural solid is represented as an assembly of one-dimensional elements. This idea allows one to provide robust models for propagation of discontinuities, multiple cracks interaction or cracks coalescence. Many procedures for computation of lattice element parameters for representing linear elastic continuum have been developed, with the most often used ones discussed herein. Special attention is dedicated to presenting the ability of this kind of models to consider material disorder, heterogeneities and multi-phase materials, which makes lattice models attractive for meso- or micro-scale simulations of failure phenomena in quasi-brittle materials, such as concrete or rocks. Common difficulties encountered in material failure and a way of dealing with them in the lattice models framework are explained in detail. Namely, the size of the localized fracture process zone around the propagating crack plays a key role in failure mechanism, which is observed in various models of linear elastic fracture mechanics, multi-scale theories, homogenization techniques, finite element models, molecular dynamics. An efficient way of dealing with this kind of phenomena is by introducing the embedded strong discontinuity into lattice elements, resulting with mesh-independent computations of failure response. Moreover, mechanical lattice can be coupled with mass transfer problems, such as moisture, heat or chloride ions transfer which affect the material durability. Any close interaction with a fluid can lead to additional time dependent degradation. For illustration, the lattice approach to porous media coupling is given here as well. Thus, the lattice element models can serve for efficient simulations of material failure mechanisms, even when considering multi-physics coupling. The main peculiarities of such an approach have been presented and discussed in this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hrennikoff A (1941) Solution of problems of elasticity by the framework method. ASME J Appl Mech 8:A619–A715

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Schlangen E, Garboczi EJ (1996) New method for simulating fracture using an elastically uniform random geometry lattice. Int J Eng Sci 34:1131–1144

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ostoja-Starzewski M (2002) Lattice models in micromechanics. Appl Mech Rev 55(1):35–60

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Schlangen E, Van Mier JGM (1992) Simple lattice model for numerical simulation of fracture of concrete materials and structures. Mater Struct 25:534–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schlangen E, Van Mier JGM (1992) Experimental and numerical analysis of micromechanisms of fracture of cement-based composites. Cem Concr Compos 14:105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benkemoun N, Hautefeuille M, Colliat JB, Ibrahimbegovic A (2010) Failure of heterogeneous materials: 3D meso-scale FE models with embedded discontinuities. Int J Numer Methods Eng 82:1671–1688

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Benkemoun N, Ibrahimbegovic A, Colliat JB (2012) Anisotropic constitutive model of plasticity capable of accounting for details of meso-structure of two-phase composite material. Comput Struct 90–91:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikolic M, Ibrahimbegovic A, Miscevic P (2015) Brittle and ductile failure of rocks: embedded discontinuity approach for representing mode I and mode II failure mechanisms. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102:1507–1526

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Nikolic M, Ibrahimbegovic A (2015) Rock mechanics model capable of representing initial heterogeneities and full set of 3D failure mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 290:209–227

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Vassaux M, Richard B, Ragueneau F, Millard A, Delaplace A (2015) Lattice models applied to cyclic behavior description of quasi-brittle materials: advantages of implicit integration. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 39:775–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vassaux M, Oliver-Leblond C, Richard B, Ragueneau F (2016) Beam-particle approach to model cracking and energy dissipation in concrete: identification strategy and validation. Cem Concr Compos 70:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cusatis G, Pelessone D, Mencarelli A (2011) Lattice discrete particle model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. I: theory. Cem Concr Compos 33:881–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cusatis G, Mencarelli A, Pelessone D, Baylot J (2011) Lattice discrete particle model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. I: calibration and validation. Cem Concr Compos 33:891–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikolic M, Ibrahimbegovic A, Miscevic P (2016) Discrete element model for the analysis of fluid-saturated fractured poro-plastic medium based on sharp crack representation with embedded strong discontinuities. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 298:407–427

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Nikolic M, Ibrahimbegovic A, Miscevic P (2016) Modelling of internal fluid flow in cracks with embedded strong discontinuities. In: Ibrahimbegovic A (ed) Computational methods for solids and fluids—multiscale analysis, probability aspects and model reduction. Springer, Switzerland, pp 315–341

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grassl P (2009) A lattice approach to model flow in cracked concrete. Cem Concr Compos 31:454–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grassl P, Fahy C, Gallipoli D, Wheeler SJ (2015) On a 2D hydro-mechanical lattice approach for modelling hydraulic fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 75:104–118

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirkwood JG (1939) The skeletal modes of vibration of long chain molecules. J Chem Phys 7:506–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keating PN (1966) Effect of invariance requirements on the elastic strain energy of crystals with application to the diamond structure. Phys Rev 145:637–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hassold GN, Srolovitz DJ (1989) Brittle fracture in materials with random defects. Phys Rev 39:9273–9281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cusatis G, Bazant Z, Cedolin L (2006) Confinement-shear lattice CSL model for fracture propagation in concrete. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:7154–7171

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang CS, Wang TK, Sluys LJ, van Mier JGM (2002) Fracture modeling using a micro-structural mechanics approach I. Theory and formulation. Eng Fract Mech 69:1941–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Karihaloo BL, Shao PF, Xiao QZ (2003) Lattice modelling of the failure of particle composites. Eng Fract Mech 70:2385–2406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bolander J, Saito S (1998) Fracture analyses using spring networks with random geometry. Eng Fract Mech 61:569–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Green PJ, Sibson R (1978) Computing Dirichlet tessellations in the plane. Comput J 21:168–173

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Bolander J, Sukumar N (2005) Irregular lattice model for quasistatic crack propagation. Phys Rev 71:094106-1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Berton S, Bolander J (2006) Crack band model of fracture in irregular lattices. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:7172–7181

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Grassl P, Jirasek M (2010) Meso-scale approach to modelling the fracture process zone of concrete subjected to uniaxial tension. Int J Solids Struct 47:957–968

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Grassl P, Gregoire D, Solano LR, Pijaudier-Cabot G (2012) Meso-scale modelling of the size effect on the fracture process zone of concrete. Int J Solids Struct 49:1818–1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gregoire D, Verdon L, Lefort V, Grassl P, Saliba J, Regoin J-P, Loukili A, Pijaudier-Cabot G (2015) Mesoscale analysis of failure in quasi-brittle materials: comparison between lattice model and acoustic emission data. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 39:1639–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Griffith A (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Phil Trans R Soc A 221:163–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Irwin G (1957) Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate. J Appl Mech 24:361–364

    Google Scholar 

  33. Orowan E (1948) Fracture and strength of solids. Rep Prog Phys 12:185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Herrmann HJ, Roux S (1990) Modelization of fracture in disordered systems. In: Herrmann HJ, Roux S (eds) Statistical models for the fracture of disordered media. Elsevier, North Holland, pp 159–188

  36. Ibrahimbegovic A (2009) Nonlinear solid mechanics: theoretical formulations and finite element solution methods. Springer, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Bazant ZP, Lin FB (1988) Non-local yield limit degradation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 26:1805–1823

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Bazant ZP, Pijaudier-Cabot G (1988) Non linear continuous damage, localization instability and convergence. J Appl Mech 55:287–293

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Nguyen VP, Lloberas-Valls O, Stroeven M, Sluys LJ (2011) Homogenization-based multiscale crack modelling: from micro-diffusive damage to macro-cracks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 200:1220–1236

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Contrafatto L, Cuomo M, Gazzo S (2016) A concrete homogenisation technique at meso-scale level accounting for damaging behaviour of cement paste and aggregates. Comput Struct 173:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Toro S, Sanchez PJ, Blanco PJ, de Souza Neto EA, Huespe AE, Feijoo RA (2016) Multiscale formulation for material failure accounting for cohesive cracks at the macro and micro scales. Int J Plast 76:75–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Oliver J, Caicedo M, Roubin E, Huespe AE, Hernandez JA (2015) Continuum approach to computational multiscale modeling of propagating fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 294:384–427

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Fish J (2006) Bridging the scales in nano engineering and science. J Nanopart Res 8:577–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ibrahimbegovic A, Niekamp R, Kassiotis C, Markovic D, Matthies H (2014) Code-coupling strategy for efficient development of computer software in multiscale and multiphysics nonlinear evolution problems in computational mechanics. Adv Eng Softw 72:8–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rountree CL, Kalia RK, Lidorikis E, Nakano A, Van Brutzel L, Vashishta P (2002) Atomistic aspects of crack propagation in brittle materials: multimillion atom molecular dynamics simulations. Ann Rev Mater Res 32:377–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bonamy D, Bouchaud E (2011) Failure of heterogeneous materials: a dynamic phase transition? Phys Rep 498:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kalia RK, Nakano A, Vashishta P, Rountree CL, Van Brutzel L, Ogata S (2003) Multiresolution atomistic simulations of dynamic fracture in nanostructured ceramics and glasses. Int J Fract 121:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–129

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lilliu G, van Mier JGM (2003) 3D lattice type fracture model for concrete. Eng Fract Mech 70:927941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Moes N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46:131–150

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Fries TP, Belytschko T (2006) The intrinsic XFEM: a method for arbitrary discontinuities without additional unknowns. Int J Numer Methods Eng 68:1358–1385

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Fries TP, Belytschko T (2010) The generalized/extended finite element method: an overview of the method and its applications. Int J Numer Methods Eng 84:253–304

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Jirasek M (2000) Comparative study on finite elements with embedded discontinuities. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 188:307–330

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Oliver J, Huespe AE, Sanchez PJ (2006) A comparative study on finite elements for capturing strong discontinuities: E-FEM vs X-FEM. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 195:4732–4752

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Linder C, Armero F (2007) Finite elements with embedded strong discontinuities for the modeling of failure in solids. Int J Numer Meth Eng 72:1391–1433

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Brancherie D, Ibrahimbegovic A (2009) Novel anisotropic continuum-discrete damage model capable of representing localized failure of massive structures, Part I: theoretical formulation and numerical implementation. Eng Comput 26:100–127

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Dujc J, Brank B, Ibrahimbegovic A (2013) Stress-hybrid quadrilateral finite element with embedded strong discontinuity for failure analysis of plane stress solids. Int J Numer Meth Eng 94:1075–1098

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Gedik YH, Nakamura H, Yamamoto Y, Kunieda M (2011) Evaluation of three-dimensional effects in short deep beams using a rigid-body-spring-model. Cem Concr Compos 33:978–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yamamoto Y, Nakamura H, Kuroda I, Furuya N (2014) Crack propagation analysis of reinforced concrete wall under cyclic loading using RBSM. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 18:780–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Obermayr M, Dressler K, Vrettos C, Eberhard P (2013) A bonded-particle model for cemented sand. Comput Geotech 49:299–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Camborde F, Mariotti C, Donzé FV (2000) Numerical study of rock and concrete behaviour by discrete element modelling. Comput Geotech 27:225–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ergenzinger C, Seifried R, Eberhard P (2010) A discrete element model to describe failure of strong rock in uniaxial compression. Granul Matter 13:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  65. Utili S, Nova R (2008) Dem analysis of bonded granular geomaterials. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:1997–2031

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Obermayr M, Dressler K, Vrettos C, Eberhard P (2011) Prediction of draft forces in cohesionless soil with the discrete element method. J Terramechanics 48:347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. D’Addetta GA, Kun F, Ramm E, Herrmann HJ (2001) From solids to granulates - Discrete element simulations of fracture and fragmentation processes in geomaterials. In: Vermeer PA, Diebels S, Ehlers W, Herrmann HJ, Luding S, Ramm E (eds) Continuous and discontinuous modelling of cohesive frictional materials. Springer, Berlin, pp 231–258

  68. D’Addetta GA, Kun F, Ramm E (2002) On the application of a discrete model to the fracture process of cohesive granular materials. Granul Matter 4:77–90

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Ibrahimbegovic A, Delaplace A (2003) Microscale and mesoscale discrete models for dynamic fracture of structures built of brittle material. Comput Struct 81:1255–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Delaplace A, Ibrahimbegovic A (2006) Performance of time-stepping schemes for discrete models in fracture dynamic analysis. Int J Numer Meth Engng 65:1527–1544

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Rots JG, Invernizzi S (2004) Regularized sequentially linear saw-tooth softening model. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 28:821–856

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. Simo JC, Oliver J, Armero F (1993) An analysis of strong discontinuities induced by strain-softening in rate-independent inelastic solids. Comput Mech 12:277–296

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Ortiz M, Leroy Y, Needleman A (1987) A finite element method for localized failure analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 61:189–214

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. Simo J, Rifai M (1990) A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 29:1595–1638

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Ibrahimbegovic A, Wilson E (1991) A modified method of incompatible modes. Commun Appl Numer Methods 7:187–194

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  76. Ibrahimbegovic A, Melnyk S (2007) Embedded discontinuity finite element method for modeling of localized failure in heterogeneous materials with structured mesh: an alternative to extended finite element method. Comput Mech 40:149–155

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. Pham BM, Brancherie D, Davenne L, Ibrahimegovic A (2013) Stress resultant models for ultimate load design of reinforced concrete frames and multi-scale parameter estimates. Comput Mech 51:347–360

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Bui NN, Ngo M, Nikolic M, Brancherie D, Ibrahimbegovic A (2014) Enriched Timoshenko beam finite element for modeling bending and shear failure of reinforced concrete frames. Comput Struct 143:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Stambuk Cvitanovic N, Nikolic M, Ibrahimbegovic A (2015) Influence of specimen shape deviations on uniaxial compressive strength of limestone and similar rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 80:357–372

    Google Scholar 

  80. Bolander J, Berton S (2004) Simulation of shrinkage induced cracking in cement composite overlays. Cem Concr Compos 26:861–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Nakamura H, Srisoros W, Yashiro R, Kunieda M (2006) Time-dependent structural analysis considering mass transfer to evaluate deterioration process of RC structures. J Adv Concr Technol 4:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Wang L, Soda M, Ueda T (2008) Simulation of chloride diffusivity for cracked concrete based on RBSM and truss network model. J Adv Concr Technol 6:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wang L, Ueda T (2011) Mesoscale modelling of the chloride diffusion in cracks and cracked concrete. J Adv Concr Technol 9:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Savija B, Pacheco J, Schlangen E (2013) Lattice modeling of chloride diffusion in sound and cracked concrete. Cem Concr Compos 42:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Asahina D, Houseworth JE, Birkholzer JT, Rutqvist J, Bolander J (2014) Hydro-mechanical model for wetting/drying and fracture development in geomaterials. Comput Geosci 65:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Damjanac B, Detournay C, Cundall PA (2016) Application of particle and lattice codes to simulation of hydraulic fracturing. Comput Part Mech 3:249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Biot MA (1965) Mechanics of incremental deformations. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  88. Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  89. Lewis RW, Schrefler BA (1998) The finite element method in the static and dynamic deformation and consolidation of porous media, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split, Matice hrvatske 15, 21000, Split, Croatia

    Mijo Nikolić & Predrag Miščević

  2. Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Sarajevo, 71000, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Emir Karavelić

  3. Lab. Roberval de Mecanique, Centre de Recherche Royallieu, UT Compiegne/ Sorbonne Universities, 60200, Compiègne, France

    Emir Karavelić

  4. Lab. Roberval de Mecanique, Centre de Recherche Royallieu, Chair for Computational Mechanics, UT Compiegne/ Sorbonne Universities, 60200, Compiègne, France

    Adnan Ibrahimbegovic

Authors
  1. Mijo Nikolić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emir Karavelić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adnan Ibrahimbegovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Predrag Miščević
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mijo Nikolić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikolić, M., Karavelić, E., Ibrahimbegovic, A. et al. Lattice Element Models and Their Peculiarities. Arch Computat Methods Eng 25, 753–784 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-017-9210-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-017-9210-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation