Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of floral resource exploitation by native and invasive Argentine ants

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ants are often considered antagonists when they visit flowers because they typically steal nectar without providing pollination services. Previous research on ant–flower interactions on two species of South African Proteaceae in the Cape Floral Kingdom revealed that the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile), but not native ants, displace other floral arthropod visitors. To determine how common Argentine ant use of inflorescences is, how Argentine and native ant visits differ in the numbers they recruit to inflorescences, and what factors may affect Argentine and native ant foraging in inflorescences, I surveyed 723 inflorescences in 10 species in the genera Protea and Leucospermum across 16 sites and compared ant presence and abundance in inflorescences with abundance at nearby cat food and jam baits. Argentine ants were the most commonly encountered ant of the 22 observed. Argentine ants, as well as six species of native ants were present in all inflorescences for which they were present at nearby baits. Mean Argentine ant abundance per inflorescence was 4.4 ± 0.84 (SE) ants and similar to that of Anoplolepis custodiens and Crematogaster peringueyi, but higher than observed for the other most commonly encountered native ants, Camponotus niveosetosus and Lepisiota capensis. Both Argentine ants and A. custodiens were more likely to be found foraging in spring and under humid conditions, and in inflorescences closer to the ground, with lower sucrose concentrations, and with a greater proportion of open flowers. Argentine ants were more likely to be found in Protea inflorescences, whereas A. custodiens and L. capensis more often visited Leucospermum inflorescences. Considering its displacement of floral arthropods and widespread use of Proteaceae inflorescences, the Argentine ant could be posing a serious threat to plant and pollinator conservation in this biodiversity hotspot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abril S, Oliveras J, Gómez C (2007) Foraging activity and dietary spectrum of the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in invaded natural areas of the northeast Iberian Peninsula. Environ Entomol 36:1166–1173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Addison P, Samways M (2006) Surrogate habitats demonstrate the invasion potential of the African pugnacious ant. Biodivers Conserv 15:411–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altshuler DL (1999) Novel interactions of non-pollinating ants with pollinators and fruit consumers in a tropical forest. Oecologia 119:600–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blancafort X, Gomez C (2005) Consequences of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr), invasion on pollination of Euphorbia characias (L.) (Euphorbiaceae). Acta Oecologia 28:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Fiedler K (2004) Preferences for sugars and amino acids and their conditionality in a diverse nectar-feeding ant community. J Anim Ecol 73:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Gottsberger G, Fiedler K (2004) Sugar and amino acid composition of ant-attended nectar and honeydew sources from an Australian rainforest. Austral Ecol 29:418–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science+Business Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys B (1987) Competition for nectar between Argentine ants Iridomyrmex humilis and honeybees Apis mellifera on black ironbark Eucalyptus sideroxylon. South Afr J Zool 22:173–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius ML, Grace JK, Yates JR (1996) Acceptability of different sugars and oils to three tropical ant species (Hymen, Formicidae). Anzeiger Fur Schadlingskunde Pflanzenschutz Umweltschutz 69:41–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling RM, MacDonald IAW, Simmons MT (1996) The Cape Peninsula, South Africa: physiographical, biological and historical background to an extraordinary hot-spot of biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 5:527–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kock AE, Giliomee JH (1989) A survey of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr), (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in South African fynbos. J Entomol Soc South Afr 52:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kock AE, Giliomee JH, Pringle KL, Majer JD (1992) The influence of fire, vegetation age and Argentine ants (Iridomyrmex humilis) on ant communities in Swartsboskloof. In: Van Wilgen BW, Richardson D, Kruger FJ, van Hensbergen HJ (eds) Fire in South African Mountain Fynbos. Springer, Berlin, pp 203–215

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly D, Giliomee JH (1985) Community structure of epigaiec ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in fynbos vegetation in the Jonkershoek Valley. J Entomol Soc South Afr 48:247–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen C, Butchart B (2003) Ants in your plants: effects of nectar-thieves on pollen fertility and seed-siring capacity in the alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Oikos 101:521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazoul J (2001) Can floral repellents pre-empt potential ant-plant conflicts? Ecol Lett 4:295–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattingh V, Giliomee JH (1989) Pollination of certain Leucadendron species (Proteaceae). S Afr J Bot 55:387–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Case TJ (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:181–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human KG, Weiss S, Weiss A, Sandler B, Gordon DM (1998) Effects of abiotic factors on the distribution and activity of the invasive Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environ Entomol 27:822–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye DW (1980) The terminology of floral larceny. Ecology 61:1251–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker RR, Daehler CC, Stefan D, Keller A, Blëthgen N (2011) Hawaiian ant-flower networks: nectar-thieving ants prefer undefended native over introduced plants with floral defenses. Ecol Monogr 81:295–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay A (2004) The relative availabilities of complementary resources affect the feeding preferences of ant colonies. Behav Ecol 15:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koptur S, Truong N (1998) Facultative ant-plant interactions: nectar sugar preferences of introduced pest ant species in South Florida. Biotropica 30:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lach L (2007) A mutualism with a native membracid facilitates pollinator displacement by Argentine ants. Ecology 88:1994–2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lach L (2008) Argentine ants displace floral arthropods in a biodiversity hotspot. Divers Distrib 14:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lach L, Hooper-Bùi LM (2010) Consequences of ant invasions. In: Lach L, Parr CL, Abbott KL (eds) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 261–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey PA, Skinner JD (2001) Ant composition and activity patterns as determined by pitfall trapping and other methods in three habitats in the semi-arid Karoo. J Arid Environ 48:551–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mothapo NP, Wossler TC (2011) Behavioural and chemical evidence for multiple colonisation of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, in the Western Cape, South Africa. BMC Ecol 11:6. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-11-6

  • Ness JH (2006) A mutualism’s indirect costs: the most aggressive plant bodyguards also deter pollinators. Oikos 113:506–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson SW, Wyk B-EV (1998) Nectar sugars in Proteaceae: patterns and processes. Aust J Bot 46:489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan W (2001) Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics 57:120–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo T (2001) Proteas: a field guide to the proteas of southern Africa. Fernwood Press, Vlaeberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowles AD, Silverman J (2009) Carbohydrate supply limits invasion of natural communities by Argentine ants. Oecologia 161:161–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2010) SAS/STAT user’s guide, release 9.22. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC

  • Sarty M, Abbott K, Lester P (2007) Community level impacts of an ant invader and food mediated coexistence. Insectes Soc 54:166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaife SH (1955) The Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr. Trans R Soc South Afr XXXIV:355–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixido AL, Méndez M, Valladares F (2011) Flower size and longevity influence florivory in the large-flowered shrub Cistus ladanifer. Acta Oecol 37:418–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillberg CV, Holway DA, LeBrun EG, Suarez AV (2007) Trophic ecology of invasive Argentine ants in their native and introduced ranges. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20856–20861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Visser D (1992) The arthropods associated with Protea nitida. MSc thesis, Agricultural Sciences, University of Stellenbosch

  • Visser D, Wright MG, Giliomee JH (1996) The effect of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), on flower-visiting insects of Protea nitida Mill. (Proteaceae). Afr Entomol 4:285–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters AC, Mackay DA (2003) An experimental study of the relative humidity preference and survival of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): comparisons with a native Iridomyrmex species in South Australia. Insectes Soc 50:355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler DE (1994) Nourishment in ants: patterns in individuals and societies. In: Hunt JH, Nalepa CA (eds) Nourishment and evolution in insect societies. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 245–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder SM, Holway DA, Suarez AV, LeBrun EG, Eubanks MD (2011) Intercontinental differences in resource use reveal the importance of mutualisms in fire ant invasions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20639–20644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willmer PG, Nuttman CV, Raine NE, Stone GN, Pattrick JG, Henson K, Stillman P, McIlroy L, Potts SG, Knudsen JT (2009) Floral volatiles controlling ant behaviour. Funct Ecol 23:888–900

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Mike Picker of the University of Cape Town for hosting me during this work and Hamish Robertson for assistance with ant identifications. I am grateful to Cape Nature Conservation and reserve and park managers, particularly Craig Spencer, for allowing me access to sites. Robert Junker and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on an earlier draft. This work was funded by the National Science Foundation under grant number 0114923.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Plant Biology and Centre for Integrative Bee Research M090, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy., Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia

    Lori Lach

Authors
  1. Lori Lach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lori Lach.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Kris Wyckhuys.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lach, L. A comparison of floral resource exploitation by native and invasive Argentine ants. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 7, 177–190 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-012-9231-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-012-9231-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation