Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contrasting egg and larval performances help explain polyphagy in a florivorous butterfly

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined both egg and larval performances in the polyphagous butterfly Parrhasius polibetes (Lycaenidae) using two host plants differing in morphological and ecological traits. Oviposition on mixed and pure patches of Schefflera vinosa (Araliaceae) and Pyrostegia venusta (Bignoniaceae), as well as the fate of eggs laid on both hosts, was assessed. To disentangle the effects of egg origin and host quality on larval performance, eggs were collected from Schefflera and Pyrostegia, and the corresponding newly hatched larvae were reared either on the natal (control) or non-natal (experimental) host. Lastly, we evaluated whether early and late instars are able to switch to alternative hosts. In both mixed and pure patches, parasitism was significantly lower, and oviposition and hatching rates were significantly higher for eggs laid on Schefflera than on Pyrostegia. Survivorship did not differ among treatments. Larvae fed with Pyrostegia were heavier than those fed with Schefflera, regardless of egg origin. Only early instars fed with Schefflera switched to Pyrostegia in the tests; in the remaining cases, larvae fed on the alternative hosts significantly less than on the controls. Our results help to explain why the use of multiple hosts by P. polibetes is maintained in nature, as the host conferring superior egg survival may incur poor larval performance and vice versa. Oviposition pattern is better understood from a tri-trophic rather than a bi-trophic perspective. Our study also highlights the monophagous condition of individual P. polibetes larvae; the constraint for switching to novel hosts is dependent on both larval instar and host plant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badenes-Pérez FR, Alfaro-Alpízar MA, Johnson MT (2010) Diversity, ecology and herbivory of hairstreak butterflies (Theclinae) associated with the velvet tree, Miconia calvescens in Costa Rica. J Inst Sci 10:209. Available online: insectscience.org/10.209

  • Ballabeni P, Conconi D, Gateff S, Rahier M (2001) Spatial proximity between two host plant species influences oviposition and larval distribution in a leaf beetle. Oikos 92:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballmer GR, Pratt GF (1988) A survey of the last instar larvae of Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera) of California. J Res Lepid 27:1–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Chapman RF (1994) Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Weiss MR (1996) Induced food preferences in caterpillars: the need to identify mechanisms. Ent Exp Appl 78:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KS Jr (1992) Borboletas da Serra do Japi: diversidade, hábitos, recursos alimentares e variação temporal. In: Morellato LPC (ed) História Natural da Serra do Japi: ecologia e preservação de uma área florestal no sudeste do Brasil. FAPESP/UNICAMP, Campinas, pp 142–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen TP, Reichardt PB, Bryant JP, Werner RA (1991) Long-term and short-term induction in quaking aspen: relted phenomena? In: Tallamy DW, Raupp MJ (eds) Phytochemical induction by herbivores. Wiley, New York, pp 71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP (1984) Habitat versus food plant selection. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR (eds) The biology of butterflies. Academic Press, London, pp 89–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS (1999) Ant-homoptera interactions in a neotropical savanna: the honeydew producing treehopper Guayaquila xiphias (Membracidae) and its associated ant fauna on Didymopanax vinosum (Araliaceae). Biotropica 39:135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck HV, Regniers S (2010) Egg spreading in the ant-parasitic butterfly, Maculinea alcon: from individual behavior to egg distribution pattern. Anim Behav 80:621–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ (1994) Parasitoids: behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gripenberg S, Mayhew PJ, Parnell M, Roslin T (2010) A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol Let 13:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haukioja E (1980) The role of plant defenses in the fluctuation of herbivore populations. Oikos 35:202–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper KR (1999) Risk-spreading and bet-hedging in insect population biology. Annu Rev Entomol 44:535–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Istock CA (1967) The evolution of complex life cycle phenomena: an ecological perspective. Evolution 21:592–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janz N, Söderlind L, Nylin S (2009) No effect of larval experience on adult host preferences in Polygonia c-album (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): on the persistence of Hopkins’ host selection principle. Ecol Entomol 34:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski LA, Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS (2010) Interaction between mutualisms: ant-tended butterflies exploit enemy-free space provided by ant-treehopper associations. Am Nat 176:322–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski LA, Rodrigues D, Freitas AVL (2012) Immature stages of Parrhasius polibetes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): host plants, myrmecophily, and co-occurrence with hemipteran trophobionts. J Nat Hist 11:645–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching RL (1981) Egg clustering in southern hemisphere lycaenids: comments on a paper by N. E Stamp Am Nat 118:423–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Scheirs J, Heckel DG (2012) Trade-offs of host use between generalist and specialist Helicoverpa sibling species: adult oviposition and larval performance. Oecologia 168:459–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi H, Souza HM (2001) Plantas ornamentais no Brasil: arbustivas, herbáceas e trepadeiras, 3rd edn. Plantarum, Nova Odessa

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucchetta P, Bernstein C, Théry M, Lazzari C, Desouhant C (2008) Foraging and associative learning of visual signals in a parasitic wasp. Anim Cogn 11:525–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michaud JP (1990) Conditions for the evolution of polyphagy in herbivorous insects. Oikos 57:278–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro RF (1991) Cryptic larval polychromatism in Rekoa marius Lucas and R. palegon Cramer. J Res Lepid 29:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira PS, Del-Claro K (2005) Multitrophic interactions in a neotropical savanna: ant-hemipteran systems, associated insect herbivores and a host plant. In: Burslem DFRP, Pinard MA, Hartley SE (eds) Biotic interactions in the tropics: their role in maintenance of species diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 414–438

  • Orsak L, Whitman DW (1987) Chromatic polymorphism in Callophrys bayensis larvae (Lycaenidae): spectral characterization, short-term color shifts, and natural morph frequencies. J Res Lepid 25:188–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Polatto LP, Dutra JCS, Alves VV Jr (2007) Biologia reprodutiva de Pyrostegia venusta (Ker-Gawl) Miers (Bignoniaceae) e comportamento de forrageamento dos visitantes florais predominantes. Rev Biol Trop 4:46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Refsnider JM, Janzen FJ (2010) Putting eggs in one basket: ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for variation in oviposition-site choice. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 41:39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues D, Kaminski LA, Freitas AVL, Oliveira PS (2010) Trade-offs underlying polyphagy in a facultative butterfly: the role of food quality and enemy-free space. Oecologia 163:719–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roslin T, Salminen JP (2008) Specialization pays off: contrasting effects of two types of tannins on oak specialist and generalist moth species. Oikos 117:1560–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheirs J, Jordaens K, de Bruyn L (2005) Have genetic trade-offs in host use been overlooked in arthropods? Evol Ecol 19:551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MS (2008) Evolutionary ecology of polyphagy. In: Tilmon KJ (ed) Specialization, speciation and radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood R (1984) Insects on plants: community patterns and mechanisms. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1988) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Ent Exp Appl 47:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (2005) The geographic mosaic of coevolution. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Turlings TCJ, Wackers FL, Vet LEM, Lewis WJ, Tumlinson JH (1993) Learning of host-location cues by hymenopterous parasitoids. In: Papaj DR, Lewis A (eds) Insect learning: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 51–78

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wee B, Singer MC (2007) Variation among individuals along a specialist-generalist axis: no support for the ‘neural constraint’ hypothesis. Ecol Entomol 32:257–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Síncrotron staff, namely Carla Beraldo, for allowing us to work in the cerrado area, and Lucas A. Kaminski, Noemy Seraphim, Eduardo de P. Barbosa and Niklas Wahlberg for helpful discussion. Adilson R. Moreira assisted us in the field, and Rodrigo Cogni, Bodil N. Cass and three anonymous reviewers made valuable comments on the manuscript. José R. Trigo was of great help in terms of suggesting ideas for this paper, laboratory support, statistical guidance, and discussing the work. Jayme A. Prevedello and Míriam P. Albrecht kindly helped us with respect to generalized linear model procedures. We are also very grateful to Paulo S. Oliveira for encouragement and support that made this work possible. DR has been supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, Grant # 2007/07802-4). AVLF acknowledges Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (300282/2008-7), FAPESP (04/05269-9 and (11/50225-3) and US National Science Foundation (DEB-0527441).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, CP 6109, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil

    Daniela Rodrigues & André V. L. Freitas

  2. Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CP 68020, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil

    Daniela Rodrigues

Authors
  1. Daniela Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. André V. L. Freitas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Rodrigues.

Additional information

Handling Editors: Yvan Rahbe and Heikki Hokkanen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodrigues, D., Freitas, A.V.L. Contrasting egg and larval performances help explain polyphagy in a florivorous butterfly. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 7, 159–167 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-012-9230-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-012-9230-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation