Skip to main content
Log in

Edge effects decrease ant-derived benefits to seedlings in a neotropical savanna

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Edge effects may lead to changes in mutualistic plant–animal interactions, such as seed dispersal, that are critical to plant regeneration. However, research into edge effects is neglected in the Brazilian cerrado, the largest neotropical savanna. We evaluated the consequences of edge effects in the cerrado for the regeneration of Erythroxylum pelleterianum (Erythroxylaceae), a shrub that benefits from seed dispersal by ants. We compared air temperature, relative humidity, and vapor pressure deficit, as well as the frequency and outcome of ant–diaspore interactions between cerrado edges and interiors. The inner portion of cerrado was likely to be moister than its borders, but seed production and germination did not differ between edge and interior of cerrado. Ants removed more seeds near fragment edges than at the interior. However, Myrmicinae ants dominated ant–fruit interactions at edges. These ants are likely to provide few benefits to the seeds. Seedlings of E. pelleterianum growing close to Ponerinae ant nests showed higher survival than seedlings growing away from nests in the interior of cerrado, but such effect disappeared near edges. Widespread seedling mortality due to a higher evaporative demand at edges may partially account for this effect. Furthermore, Ponerinae’s nests also showed a lower residence time near edges, decreasing possible benefits derived from ant colony activity such as nutrient enrichment and protection against insect herbivores. Edge effects could change the structure and dynamics of vegetation in cerrado fragments, due in part to the collapse of the mutualistic interactions demonstrated here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aizen MA, Feinsinger P (1994) Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology 75:330–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benitez-Malvido J (2002) Regeneration in tropical rainforest fragments. In: Bierregaard RO Jr, Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, Mesquita R (eds) Lessons from Amazonia: the ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 136–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandão CRF, Silva RR, Feitosa RM (2011) Cerrado ground-dwelling ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as indicators of edge effects. Zoologia 28:379–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruna EM (1999) Seed germination in rainforest fragments. Nature 402:139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruna EM (2002) Effects of forest fragmentation on Heliconia acuminata seedling recruitment in central Amazonia. Oecologia 132:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell GS (1977) An introduction to environmental biophysics. Heidelberg Science Library, Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho KS, Vasconcelos HL (1999) Forest fragmentation and its effects on litter-dwelling ants. Biol Cons 91:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcanti RB, Joly CA (2002) Biodiversity and conservation priorities in the cerrado region. In: Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (eds) The cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 351–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian CE, Stanton ML (2004) Cryptic consequences of a dispersal mutualism: seed burial, elaiosome removal, and seed-bank dynamics. Ecology 85:1101–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christianini AV, Oliveira PS (2009) The relevance of ants as seed rescuers of a primarily bird-dispersed tree in the Neotropical cerrado savanna. Oecologia 160:735–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christianini AV, Oliveira PS (2010) Birds and ants provide complementary seed dispersal in a neotropical savanna. J Ecol 98:573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christianini AV, Mayhé-Nunes AJ, Oliveira PS (2007) The role of ants in the removal of non-myrmecochorous diaspores and seed germination in a Neotropical savanna. J Trop Ecol 23:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christianini AV, Mayhé-Nunes AJ, Oliveira PS (2012) Exploitation of fallen diaspores by ants: are there ant–plant partner choices? Biotropica 44:360–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro NJ, Howe HF (2003) Forest fragmentation severs mutualism between seed dispersers and an endemic African tree. PNAS 100:14052–14056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crist TO (2009) Biodiversity, species interactions, and functional roles of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in fragmented landscapes: a review. Myrmecol News 12:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS (1999) Ant–homoptera interactions in neotropical savanna: the honeydew-producing treehopper Guayaquila xiphias (Membracidae) and its associated ant fauna on Didymopanax vinosum (Araliaceae). Biotropica 31:135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira AV, Bruna EM, Vasconcelos HL (2011) Seed predators limit plant recruitment in Neotropical savannas. Oikos 120:1013–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco AC (2002) Ecophysiology of woody plants. In: Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (eds) The cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 178–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannotti E (1988) Composição florística e estrutura fitossociológica da vegetação de cerrado e da transição entre cerrado e mata ciliar da Estação Experimental de Itirapina (SP). Masters Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil

  • Hoffmann WA (1996) The effects of fire and cover on seedling establishment in a neotropical savanna. J Ecol 84:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honnay O, Jacquemyn H, Bossuyt B, Hermy M (2005) Forest fragmentation effects on patch occupancy and population viability of herbaceous plant species. New Phytol 166:723–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L (1990) The relocation of ant nest entrances—potential consequences for ant-dispersed seeds. Austr J Ecol 16:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jules ES (1998) Habitat fragmentation and demographic change for a common plant: Trillium in old-growth forest. Ecology 79:1645–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jules ES, Rathcke BJ (1999) Mechanisms of reduced Trillium recruitment along edges of old-growth forest fragments. Cons Biol 13:784–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Yensen E (1991) Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biol Cons 55:77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Camargo JLC, Luizão RCC et al (2010) The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: a 32-year investigation. Biol Cons 144:56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal IR, Oliveira PS (1998) Interactions between fungus-growing ants (Attini), fruits and seeds in cerrado vegetation in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica 30:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levey DJ, Byrne MM (1993) Complex ant–plant interactions: rain forest ants as secondary dispersers and post-dispersal seed predators. Ecology 74:1802–1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moles AT, Westoby M (2004) What do seedlings die from and what are the implications for the evolution of seed size? Oikos 106:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ness JH (2004) Forest edges and fire ants alter the seed shadow of an ant-dispersed plant. Oecologia 138:448–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira PS, Freitas AVL (2004) Ant–plant–herbivore interactions in the neotropical cerrado savanna. Naturwiss 91:557–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Filho AT, Ratter JA (2002) Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the cerrado biome. In: Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (eds) The cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 91–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Passos L, Oliveira PS (2002) Ants affect the distribution and performance of Clusia criuva seedlings, a primarily bird-dispersed rainforest tree. J Ecol 90:517–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passos L, Oliveira PS (2004) Interaction between ants and fruits of Guapira opposita (Nyctaginaceae) in a Brazilian sandy plain rainforest: ant effects on seeds and seedlings. Oecologia 139:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pivello VR, Shida CN, Meirelles ST (1999) Alien grasses in Brazilian savannas: a threat to the biodiversity. Biod Cons 8:1281–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke DA, Thompson JN (1986) Statistical analysis of survival and removal rate experiments. Ecology 67:240–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ratter JA, Bridgewater S, Ribeiro JF (2003) Analysis of the floristic composition of Brazilian cerrado vegetation III: comparison of the woody vegetation of 376 areas. Edinb J Bot 60:57–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS (2007) The ecology and evolution of ant–plant interactions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Santos T, Teleria JL (1994) Influence of forest fragmentation on seed consumption and dispersal of Spanish Juniper Juniperus thurifera. Biol Cons 70:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uriarte M, Bruna EM, Rubim P, Anciães M, Jonckheere I (2010) Effects of forest fragmentation on seedling recruitment of an understory herb: assessing seed vs. safe-site limitation. Ecology 91:1317–1328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos HL, Vieira Neto EMH, Mundim FMR, Bruna EM (2006) Roads alter the colonization dynamics of a keystone herbivore in Neotropical savannas. Biotropica 38:661–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiescher PT, Pearce-Duvet JMC, Feener DH (2012) Assembling an ant community: species functional traits reflect environmental filtering. Oecologia 169:1063–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Instituto Florestal de São Paulo and the staff of the Estação Experimental de Itirapina for logistic support during the study. M. M. Martins and S. Sendoya for help in the field. A. G. Farji-Brener, A. L. T. Souza, M. A Pizo, and two anonymous referees criticized earlier versions of the manuscript. AVC thanks the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (proc. # 02/12895-8), FAEPEX-UNICAMP and the Wiscosin Society of Science Teachers Association for financial support. PSO was supported by grants from the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq), and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (proc. # 2008/54058-1; 2011/18580-8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander V. Christianini.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Kris Wyckhuys.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christianini, A.V., Oliveira, P.S. Edge effects decrease ant-derived benefits to seedlings in a neotropical savanna. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 7, 191–199 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-012-9229-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-012-9229-9

Keywords

Navigation