Skip to main content
Log in

Structuralist Logic: Implications, Inferences, and Consequences

  • Published:
Logica Universalis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

On a structuralist account of logic, the logical operators, as well as modal operators are defined by the specific ways that they interact with respect to implication. As a consequence, the same logical operator (conjunction, negation etc.) can appear to be very different with a variation in the implication relation of a structure. We illustrate this idea by showing that certain operators that are usually regarded as extra-logical concepts (Tarskian algebraic operations on theories, mereological sum, products and negates of individuals, intuitionistic operations on mathematical problems, epistemic operations on certain belief states) are simply the logical operators that are deployed in different implication structures. That makes certain logical notions more omnipresent than one would think.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnold Koslow.

Additional information

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): Primary 03B22; Secondary 03B20, 03B42, 03B60

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koslow, A. Structuralist Logic: Implications, Inferences, and Consequences. Log. univers. 1, 167–181 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-006-0008-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-006-0008-1

Keywords.

Navigation