Skip to main content
Log in

Safety thickness analysis of tunnel floor in karst region based on catastrophe theory

  • Geological, Civil, Energy and Traffic Engineering
  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the tunnel shape, span and depth, the previous elliptical plate model and clamped beam model were modified. The modified model was applied to different situations. For the elliptical plate model, the water effects were considered. For the clamped beam model, water and horizontal stress were considered. Corresponding potential functions and cusp catastrophe models of rock system were established based on the catastrophe theory. The expressions of critical safety thickness were derived with necessary and sufficient conditions. The method was applied to the practical engineering. Some parameters related to the stability were discussed. The results show that elastic modulus and thickness are advantageous to the floor stability, and that the load, span, horizontal stress and water are disadvantageous to the floor stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LIU Chao-qun, PENG Hong-jun. Analysis of the safe distance between a tunnel face and karst cave [J]. Modern Tunneling Technology, 2012, 49(3): 109–113. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. GUO Ming. Study on concealed karst cave’s influence on karst tunnel stability and treatment technology on tunnel of E-xi mountains [D]. Shandong: Shandong University, 2014. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. PESENDORFER M, LOEW S. Subsurface exploration and transient pressure testing from a deep tunnel in fractured and karstified limestones [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2010, 47(1): 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. FRALDI M, GUARRACINO F. Analytical solutions for collapse mechanisms in tunnels with arbitrary cross sections [J]. International Journal of Solids & Structures, 2010, 47(2): 216–223.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. FRALDI M, GUARRACINO F. Limit analysis of collapse mechanisms in cavities and tunnels according to the Hoek–Brown failure criterion [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2009, 46(4): 665–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. JIANG Chong, ZHAO Ming-hua, CAO Wen-gui. Stability analysis of subgrade cave roofs in karst region [J]. Journal of Centre South University, 2008, 15(S2): 38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. MO Yang-chun, ZHOU Xiao-jun. Safe thickness analysis of cave under the road in karst region based on catastrophe theory [J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2008(2): 31–33. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. YANG X L, XU J S, LI Y X, YAN R M. Collapse mechanism of tunnel roof considering joined influences of nonlinearity and non-associated flow rule [J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2016, 10(1): 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. YANG X L, LONG Z X. Seismic and static 3D stability of two-stage rock slope based on Hoek-Brown failure criterion [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016, 53(3): 551–558.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. ALI R K, REZA R, MOHAMAD A H. The stress state around lined non-circular hydraulic tunnels below the water table using complex variable method [J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2015, 78: 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  11. LIU X Y, YUAN D J. Mechanical analysis of anti-buoyancy safety for a shield tunnel under water in sands [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 47: 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. LI Y X, YANG X L. Stability analysis of crack slope considering nonlinearity and water pressure [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 20(6): 2289–2296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. YU Y, ZHU C K, CHONG D Y, LIU Y, LI S C. Catastrophe mechanism and disaster counter measure for soft rock roadway surrounding rock in Meihe mine [J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2015, 25: 407–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. YAN Chang-bi, XU Guo-yuan, ZUO Yu-jun. Destabilization analysis of overlapping underground chambers induced by blasting vibration with catastrophe theory [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2006, 16: 735–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ZHAO Y L, PENG Q Y, WAN W. Fluid-solid coupling analysis of rock pillar stability for concealed karst cave ahead of a roadway based on catastrophic theory [J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2014, 16: 737–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LI X P, LI Y N. Research on risk assessment system for water inrush in the karst tunnel construction based on GIS: Case study on the diversion tunnel groups of the Jinping II Hydropower Station [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 40: 182–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. YANG X L, DU D C. Upper bound analysis for bearing capacity of nonhomogeneous and anisotropic clay foundation [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-016-0087-3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. LI Li-ping. Study on catastrophe evolution mechanism of karst water inrush and its engineering application of high risk karst tunnel [D]. Ji’nan: Shandong University, 2009. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. YANG X L, YAN R M. Collapse mechanism for deep tunnel subjected to seepage force in layered soils [J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2015, 8(5): 741–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. YANG Xiao-li, YAO Cong, ZHANG Jia-hua. Safe retaining pressures for pressurized tunnel face using nonlinear failure criterion and reliability theory [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23(3): 708–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. XIE K. The study of thickness and robustness of karst tunnel floor which can keep the floor stable—Make the tunnel of XianRen as an example [D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2013. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Compilation Committee of Engineering Geology [M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 1992: 160–170. (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-li Yang  (杨小礼).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2013CB036004) supported by the National Basic Research Program of China; Project(51378510) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Xl., Xiao, Hb. Safety thickness analysis of tunnel floor in karst region based on catastrophe theory. J. Cent. South Univ. 23, 2364–2372 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3295-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3295-6

Key words

Navigation