Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison and effects of different climate-vegetation models in areas of complex terrain under climate change

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identifying the impacts of climate change is important for conservation of ecosystems under climate change, particularly in mountain regions. Holdridge life zone system and Köppen classification provide two effective methods to assess impacts of climate change on ecosystems, as typical climate-vegetation models. Meanwhile, these previous studies are insufficient to assess the complex terrain as well as there are some uncertainties in results while using the given methods. Analysis of the impacts of the prevailing climate conditions in an area on shifts of ecosystems may reduce uncertainties in projecting climate change. In this study, we used different models to depict changes in ecosystems at 1 km × 1 km resolution in Sichuan Province, China during 1961–2010. The results indicate that changes in climate data during the past 50 years were sufficient to cause shifts in the spatial distribution of ecosystems. The trend of shift was from low temperature ecosystems to high temperature ecosystems. Compared with Köppen classification, the Holdridge system has better adaptation to assess the impacts of climate change on ecosystems in low elevation (0–1000 m). Moreover, we found that changed areas in ecosystems were easily affected by climate change than unchanged areas by calculating current climate condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker B, Diaz H, Hargrove W et al., 2010. Use of the Köppen-Trewartha climate classification to evaluate climatic refugia in statistically derived ecoregions for the People’s Republic of China. Climatic Change, 98(1–2): 113–131. doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9622-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty A, Joshi P, Ghosh A et al., 2013. Assessing biome boundary shifts under climate change scenarios in India. Ecological Indicators, 34: 536–547. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, 2000. Characteristic change of several forest landscapes between 1896 and 1986 in Heilongjiang Province. Acta Botanica Sinica, 42(9): 979–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Zhang X S, Li B L, 2003. The possible response of life zones in China under global climate change. Global and Planetary Change, 38(3): 327–337. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8181 (03)00115-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Castro M, Gallardo C, Jylha K et al., 2007. The use of a climate-type classification for assessing climate change effects in Europe from an ensemble of nine regional climate models. Climatic Change, 81(1): 329–341. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9224-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Candolle A L P P, 1874. Constitution of physiological groups within the kingdom Plantea applicable to ancient and modern botanical geography. Archives Des Sciences Physiques Et Naturelles, 50: 5–42. (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, H F, Eischeid J K, 2007. Disappearing’ alpine tundra’ Köppen climatic type in the western United States. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(18): L18707. doi: 10.1029/2007GL031253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley J A, Levis S, Prentice I C et al., 1998. Coupling dynamic models of climate and vegetation. Global Change Biology, 4(5): 561–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gou X, Zhang F, Deng Y, et al., 2012. Patterns and dynamics of tree-line response to climate change in the eastern Qilian Mountains, northwestern China. Dendrochronologia, 30(2): 121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2011.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallgren W, Pitman A, 2000. The uncertainty in simulations by a Global Biome Model (BIOME3) to alternative parameter values. Global Change Biology, 6(5): 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans R J, Cameron S E, Parra J L et al., 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25(15): 1965–1978. doi: 10.1002/joc.1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdridge L R, 1967. Life Zone Ecology. San Jose: Tropical Science Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtt G C, Moorcroft P, Pacala S W et al., 1998. Terrestrial models and global change: challenges for the future. Global Change Biology, 4(5): 581–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye D W, Barr B, Armitage K B et al., 2000. Climate change is affecting altitudinal migrants and hibernating species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(4): 1630–1633. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köppen W, 1900. Attempted climate classification in relation to plant distributions. Geographische Zeitschrift, 6(11): 593–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C et al., 2006. World map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 15(3): 259–264. doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler J J, 2009. Climate change adaptation strategies for resource management and conservation planning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162(1): 79–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04147.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y F, Liu Y Q, Xu P et al., 2015. An assessment of changes in bioclimatic types in Sichuan Province, 1961–2010. Journal of Mountain Science, 12(1): 145–153. doi: 10.1007/s11629-014-3046-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monserud R A, Leemans R, 1992. Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic. Ecological Modelling, 62(4): 275–293. doi: 10.1016/0304-3800(92)90003-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peñuelas J, Boada M, 2003. A global change-induced biome shift in the Montseny mountains (NE Spain). Global Change Biology, 9(2): 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubel F, Kottek M, 2010. Observed and projected climate shifts 1901–2100 depicted by world maps of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 19(2): 135–141. doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2010/0430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxon E, Baker B, Hargrove W et al., 2005. Mapping environments at risk under different global climate change scenarios. Ecology Letters, 8(1): 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trewartha G T, Horn L H, 1980. An Introduction to Climate. New York: McGraw-Hill, 166–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Ni J, Prentice I C, 2011. Sensitivity of potential natural vegetation in China to projected changes in temperature, precipitation and atmospheric CO2. Regional Environmental Change, 11(3): 715–727. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2005.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue T X, Fan Z M, Liu J Y, 2005. Changes of major terrestrial ecosystems in China since 1960. Global and Planetary Change, 48(4): 287–302. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2005.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Xinshi, 1993. A vegetation-climate classification system for global change studies in China. Quaternary Sciences, 2: 157–169. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yafeng Lu.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2015CB452702)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Lu, Y. & Li, Q. Comparison and effects of different climate-vegetation models in areas of complex terrain under climate change. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 26, 188–196 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-016-0798-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-016-0798-x

Keywords

Navigation