Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Little is known about cancer survivors’ receptivity to being contacted through cancer registries for research and health promotion efforts. We sought to (1) determine breast and colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors’ responsiveness to a mailed survey using an academic medical center’s cancer registry, (2) assess whether responsiveness varied according to sociodemographic characteristics and medical history, and (3) examine the prevalence and correlates of respondents’ awareness and willingness to be contacted through the state cancer registry for future research studies.

Methods

Stage 0–III breast and CRC survivors diagnosed between January 2004 and December 2009 were identified from an academic medical center cancer registry. Survivors were mailed an invitation letter with an opt-out option, along with a survey assessing sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and follow-up cancer care access and utilization.

Results

A total of 452 (31.4 %) breast and 53 (22.2 %) CRC survivors responded. Willingness to be contacted through the state cancer registry was high among both breast (74 %) and CRC (64 %) respondents even though few were aware of the registry and even fewer knew that their information was in the registry. In multivariable analyses, tumor stage I and not having a family history of cancer were associated with willingness among breast and CRC survivors, respectively.

Conclusions

Our findings support the use of state cancer registries to contact survivors for participation in research studies.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Survivors would benefit from partnerships between researchers and cancer registries that are focused on health promotion interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Facts & Figures 2012–2013. Last update 2012. a-42. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-033876.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2012.

  2. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:117–28. doi:10.1093/jnci/djq495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hewitt M, Greenfield SSE. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington: National Academies; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, Cooper D, Gansler T, Lerro C, Fedewa S, Lin C, Leach C, Cannady RS, Cho H, Scoppa S, Hachey M, Kirch R, Jemal A, Ward E. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:220–41. doi:10.3322/caac.21149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lash TL, Fox MP, Buist DS, Wei F, Field TS, Frost FJ, Geiger AM, Quinn VP, Yood MU, Silliman RA. Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3001–6. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.9572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper GS, Kou TD, Reynolds Jr HL. Receipt of guideline-recommended follow-up in older colorectal cancer survivors: a population-based analysis. Cancer. 2008;113:2029–37. doi:10.1002/cncr.23823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1783–99. doi:10.1007/s10350-007-9030-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffery GM, Hickey BE, Hider P. Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. CD002200. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002200.pub2

  9. Breslau ES, Jeffery DD, Davis WW, Moser RP, McNeel TS, Hawley S. Cancer screening practices among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer survivors: results from the 2001 and 2003 California health interview survey. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4:1–14. doi:10.1007/s11764-009-0102-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carcaise-Edinboro P, Bradley CJ, Dahman B. Surveillance mammography for Medicaid/Medicare breast cancer patients. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4:59–66. doi:10.1007/s11764-009-0107-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Doubeni CA, Field TS, Ulcickas Yood M, Rolnick SJ, Quessenberry CP, Fouayzi H, Gurwitz JH, Wei F. Patterns and predictors of mammography utilization among breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2006;106:2482–8. doi:10.1002/cncr.21893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Duffy CM, Clark MA, Allsworth JE. Health maintenance and screening in breast cancer survivors in the United States. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30:52–7. doi:10.1016/j.cdp.2005.06.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elston Lafata J, Simpkins J, Schultz L, Chase GA, Johnson CC, Yood MU, Lamerato L, Nathanson D, Cooper G. Routine surveillance care after cancer treatment with curative intent. Med Care. 2005;43:592–9. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000163656.62562.c4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Field TS, Doubeni C, Fox MP, Buist DS, Wei F, Geiger AM, Quinn VP, Lash TL, Prout MN, Yood MU, Frost FJ, Silliman RA. Under utilization of surveillance mammography among older breast cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:158–63. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0471-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Geller BM, Kerlikowske K, Carney PA, Abraham LA, Yankaskas BC, Taplin SH, Ballard-Barbash R, Dignan MB, Rosenberg R, Urban N, Barlow WE. Mammography surveillance following breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;81:107–15. doi:10.1023/A:1025794629878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katz ML, Donohue KA, Alfano CM, Day JM, Herndon JE, Paskett ED. Cancer surveillance behaviors and psychosocial factors among long-term survivors of breast cancer. Cancer and Leukemia Group B 79804. Cancer. 2009;115:480–8. doi:10.1002/cncr.24063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khan NF, Carpenter L, Watson E, Rose PW. Cancer screening and preventative care among long-term cancer survivors in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:1085–90. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605609.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Andersen MR, Urban N. The use of mammography by survivors of breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1713–5. doi:10.2105/AJPH.88.11.1713.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boehmer U, Harris J, Bowen DJ, Schroy III PC. Surveillance after colorectal cancer diagnosis in a safety net hospital. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010;21:1138–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cooper GS, Payes JD. Temporal trends in colorectal procedure use after colorectal cancer resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:933–40. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2006.08.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ellison GL, Warren JL, Knopf KB, Brown ML. Racial differences in the receipt of bowel surveillance following potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:1885–903. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00207.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Elston Lafata J, Cole JC, Ben-Menachem T, Morlock RJ. Sociodemographic differences in the receipt of colorectal cancer surveillance care following treatment with curative intent. Med Care. 2001;39:361–72. doi:10.1097/00005650-200104000-00007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Foley KL, Song EY, Klepin H, Geiger A, Tooze J. Screening colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors insured by Medicaid. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012;35:205–11. doi:10.1097/COC.0b013e318209d21e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson GL, Melton LD, Abbott DH, Zullig LL, Ordin DL, Grambow SC, Hamilton NS, Zafar SY, Gellad ZF, Kelley MJ, Provenzale D. Quality of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3176–81. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.26.7948.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rolnick S, Alford SH, Kucera GP, Fortman K, Yood MU, Jankowski M, Johnson CC. Racial and age differences in colon examination surveillance following a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;2005:96–101. doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rulyak SJ, Mandelson MT, Brentnall TA, Rutter CM, Wagner EH. Clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with colon surveillance among patients with a history of colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:239–47. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02531-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grunfeld E, Hodgson DC, Del Giudice ME, Moineddin R. Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6:174–81. doi:10.1200/JOP.200009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Winer EP, Ayanian JZ. Surveillance testing among survivors of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1074–81. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.08.6876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sankila R, Martinez C, Parkin DM, Storm H, Teppo L. Informed consent in cancer registries. Lancet. 2001;357:1536. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04699-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Beskow LM, Sandler RS, Weinberger M. Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: balancing privacy and scientific issues. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:1920–6. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.061556.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. AJCC. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. Chicago: American Joint Committee on Cancer; 2002.

  32. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Newcomb PA, Love RR, Phillips JL, Buckmaster BJ. Using a population-based cancer registry for recruitment in a pilot cancer control study. Prev Med. 1990;19:61–5. doi:10.1016/0091-7435(90)90008-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sugarman J, Regan K, Parker B, Bluman LG, Schildkraut J. Ethical ramifications of alternative means of recruiting research participants from cancer registries. Cancer. 1999;86:647–51. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990815)86:4<647::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-G.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pakilit AT, Kahn BA, Petersen L, Abraham LS, Greendale GA, Ganz PA. Making effective use of tumor registries for cancer survivorship research. Cancer. 2001;92:1305–14. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1305::AID-CNCR1452>3.0.CO;2-M.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rogerino A, Grant LL, Wilcox III H, Schmitz KH. Geographic recruitment of breast cancer survivors into community-based exercise interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:1413–20. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31819af871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Boehmer U, Clark M, Glickman M, Timm A, Sullivan M, Bradford J, Bowen DJ. Using cancer registry data for recruitment of sexual minority women: successes and limitations. J Women's Health. 2010;19:1289–97. doi:10.1089/jwh.2009.1744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pal T, Rocchio E, Garcia A, Rivers D, Vadaparampil S. Recruitment of black women for a study of inherited breast cancer using a cancer registry-based approach. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2011;15:69–77. doi:10.1089/gtmb.2010.0098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kelly BJ, Fraze TK, Hornik RC. Response rates to a mailed survey of a representative sample of cancer patients randomly drawn from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry: a randomized trial of incentive and length effects. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:65. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Salsman JM, Segerstrom SC, Brechting EH, Carlson CR, Andrykowski MA. Posttraumatic growth and PTSD symptomatology among colorectal cancer survivors: a 3-month longitudinal examination of cognitive processing. Psychooncology. 2009;18:30–41. doi:10.1002/pon.1367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lowery JT, Axell L, Vu K, Rycroft R. A novel approach to increase awareness about hereditary colon cancer using a state cancer registry. Genet Med. 2010;12:721–5. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f1366a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kaiser K. The meaning of the survivor identity for women with breast cancer. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:79–87. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jacobsen GD, Jacobsen KH. Health awareness campaigns and diagnosis rates: evidence from National Breast Cancer Awareness Month. J Health Econ. 2011;30:55–61. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Harvey JA, Strahilevitz MA. The power of pink: cause-related marketing and the impact on breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6:26–32. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2008.07.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Williamson JM, Jones IH, Hocken DB. How does the media profile of cancer compare with prevalence? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93:9–12. doi:10.1308/003588411X12851639106954.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Beskow LM, Sandler RS, Millikan RC, Weinberger M. Patient perspectives on research recruitment through cancer registries. Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16:1171–5. doi:10.1007/s10552-005-0407-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ramirez AG, Miller AR, Gallion K, de MS SM, Chalela P, Garcia AS. Testing three different cancer genetics registry recruitment methods with Hispanic cancer patients and their family members previously registered in local cancer registries in Texas. Community Genet. 2008;11:215–23. doi:10.1159/000116882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Moncrief Cancer Institute. Funding from the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute supported MYC (K07CA140159) and SWV (R01CA112223). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Moncrief Cancer Institute, the National Cancer Institute.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Texas School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin Street, Suite 2516, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Melissa Y. Carpentier, Lara S. Savas, L. Kay Bartholomew, Sharon P. Coan & Sally W. Vernon

  2. Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Jasmin A. Tiro, Trisha V. Melhado & Keith E. Argenbright

  3. Moncrief Cancer Institute, Fort Worth, TX, USA

    Keith E. Argenbright

Authors
  1. Melissa Y. Carpentier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jasmin A. Tiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lara S. Savas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. Kay Bartholomew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Trisha V. Melhado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sharon P. Coan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Keith E. Argenbright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sally W. Vernon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa Y. Carpentier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carpentier, M.Y., Tiro, J.A., Savas, L.S. et al. Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study. J Cancer Surviv 7, 155–163 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0259-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0259-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation