Skip to main content
Log in

Matter Out of Time: The Paradox of the “Contemporary Past”

  • Research
  • Published:
Archaeologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contemporary archaeology, with its focus on the present and the very recent past, challenges the conventional definitions of archaeology that emphasize the temporal distance between the archaeologist and the subject matter being investigated. Contemporary archaeology requires different methods, forges novel interdisciplinary collaborations, and inspires new questions. In particular, contemporary archaeology reminds us that all social actors, both in the present and in the past, were uncertain of the future and could not know the outcomes of their actions.

Résumé

L’archéologie contemporaine, en se concentrant sur le présent et le passé récent, remet en question les définitions traditionnelles de l’archéologie pour souligner la distance temporelle entre l’archéologue et le sujet des recherches. L’archéologie contemporaine nécessite des méthodes différentes, elle élabore des collaborations nouvelles interdisciplinaires et pose de nouvelles questions. En particulier, elle nous rappelle que l’ensemble des acteurs sociaux, à la fois du présent et du passé, sont incertains du futur et qu’ils ne connaissent pas les résultats de leurs actions.

Resumen

La arqueología contemporánea, con su enfoque en el presente y en el pasado más reciente, desafía las definiciones convencionales de la arqueología, que enfatiza la distancia temporal entre el arqueólogo y el asunto objeto de la investigación. La arqueología contemporánea requiere métodos distintos, forja nuevas colaboraciones interdisciplinares e inspira nuevas preguntas. Concretamente, la arqueología contemporánea nos recuerda que todos los actores sociales, tanto del presente como del pasado, sentían incertidumbre por el futuro y dudaban sobre los resultados de sus acciones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References Cited

  • Cook, L. J., Yamin, R., McCarthy, J. P. 1996. Shopping as Meaningful Action: Toward a Redefinition of Consumption in Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 30(4):50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deagan, K. (1991) Historical Archaeology’s Contributions to Our Understanding of Early America. In Historical Archaeology in Global Perspectivepp. 97–112, edited by L Falk, Smithsonian Institution PressWashington, DC.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo, Routledge and Kegan PaulLondon.,

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, M. this volume. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9125-9.

  • Funari and Funari this volume. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9121-0.

  • González-Ruibal and Hernando this volume. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9120-1.

  • Hall, M. (2000) Archaeology and the Modern World: Colonial Transcripts in South Africa and the Chesapeake, RoutledgeLondon.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., Silliman, S. (2006) Introduction: Archaeology of the Modern World. In Historical Archaeologypp. 1–19, edited by M Halland S Silliman, Blackwell PublishingOxford.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. 2004. From ‘Questions that Count’ to ‘Stories that Matter’ in Historical Archaeology. Antiquity 78:934–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honerkamp, N. 1988. Questions that Count in Historical Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 22(1):5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, W. B., Noble, V. E. 1990. Other Questions that Count: Introductory Comments on Assessing Significance in Historical Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 24(2):10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Q. this volume. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9124-x.

  • Majewski, T., Schiffer, M. B. (2001) Beyond Consumption: Toward an Archaeology of Consumerism. In Archaeologies of the Contemporary Pastpp. 26–50, edited by V Buchliand G Lucas, RoutledgeNew York.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1987) Material Culture and Mass Consumption, Basil Blackwell Inc.Oxford/Cambridge, MA.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, C. R. (1996) A Historical Archaeology of the Modern World, Plenum PressNew York.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Parno, T.G. this volume. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9123-y.

  • Penrose, S. this volume. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9126-8.

  • Samuels, J. this volume. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9129-5.

  • Schiffer, M. B. 1972. Archaeological Context and Systematic Context. American Antiquity 37:156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. 1983. Toward the Identification of Formation Processes. American Antiquity 48:675–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, Yale University PressNew Haven.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, B. L. (2008) The Archaeology of Ethnogenesis: Race and Sexuality in Colonial San Francisco, University of California PressBerkeley.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, L.A. and A.E. Mosher this volume. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9128-6.

  • Wurst, L., McGuire, R. H. 1999. Immaculate Consumption: A Critique of the ‘Shop Till You Drop’ School of Human Behavior. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3(3):191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdi, L.P. this volume. doi:10.1007/s11759-010-9127-7.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara L. Voss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Voss, B.L. Matter Out of Time: The Paradox of the “Contemporary Past”. Arch 6, 181–192 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-010-9122-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-010-9122-z

Key words

Navigation