Zusammenfassung
Nachdem die elektronische Überwachung 2011 im Strafgesetzbuch verankert wurde, ergeben sich daraus für forensische Sachverständige ganz neue Fragestellungen. Insbesondere die Frage des Effektes auf die Rückfallprävention hat eine zentrale Bedeutung. Der Beitrag referiert einerseits die internationalen Erfahrungen, die Vor- und Nachteile, insbesondere bezüglich der Rückfallprävention, und andererseits die Empfehlungen hinsichtlich eines wegen mehrerer Sexualdelikte nach 10 Jahren Haft zu entlassenen Straftäters.
Abstract
For forensic expert witnesses the introduction of electronic surveillance to the German penal code system raised new questions, such as the effects on relapse prevention. This paper presents international experiences about the effects of electronic tagging, especially on relapse prevention, and lists the advantages and disadvantages of this procedure. Also the recommendations for electronic tagging concerning a sexual offender who was repeatedly convicted and released after 10 years of imprisonment are described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatur
Dodgson K, Goodwin P, Howard LT, Mortimer E, Russell N, Weiner M (2001) Electronic monitoring of released prisoners: an evaluation of the home detention curfew scheme. Home Office research study 222. Home Office, London
Gable RS (2007) Electronic monitoring of offenders: can a wayward technology be redeemed? In: PERSUASIVE 2007: second international conference on persuasive technology, Palo Alto, CA, USA, April 26-27, 2007. LNCS, vol 4744. Springer, Berlin, S 100–104
Hucklesby A (2008) Vehicles of desistance? The impact of electronically monitored curfews. Criminol Crim Justice 8:51–57
John Howard Society of Alberta (2000) Electronic monitoring. http://www.johnhoward.ab.ca/PUB/A3.htm≠INTR Zugriffsdatum: 15. Mai 2012
Kissling I, Killias M (2006) Schlussbericht über die experimentelle Evaluation von Electronic Monitoring vs. gemeinnützige Arbeit. www.ejpd.admin.ch/content/data/sicherheit/straf_und_massnahmen/monitoring/em-ga_schlussbericht-d.pdf. Zugriffsdatum: 15. Mai 2012
Mair G, Mortimer E (1996) Curfew orders with electronic monitoring. Home Office research study 120. Home Office, London
Nellis M (2009) Surveillance and confinement: explaining and understanding the experience of electronically monitored curfews. Eur J Probat 1:41–65
Paterson C (2007) “Street level surveillance”: human agency and the electronic monitoring of offenders. Surveill Soc 4:314–328
Payne BK, Gainey RR (1998) A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 42:149–163
Payne BK, Gainey RR (2004) The electronic monitoring of offenders released from jail or prison: safety, control and comparisons to the incarceration experience. Prison J 84:414–435
Richardson F (2002) A personal experience of tagging. Prison Serv J 142:39–42
Than A (2006) House arrest and electronic monitoring. II. International summer school on European peripheries, Santander, Spain
Interessenkonflikt
Es liegt bei keinem der drei Autoren ein Interessenkonflikt vor.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Häßler, F., Schütt, H. & Pobocha, J. Überwachung mittels „elektronischer Fußfessel“. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 7, 56–61 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11757-012-0191-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11757-012-0191-2
Schlüsselwörter
- Elektronische Überwachung
- Fußfessel
- Rückfallprävention
- Forensisch-psychiatrische Begutachtung
- Fallstudie