Skip to main content
Log in

Comments on: A review on empirical likelihood methods for regression

  • Discussion
  • Published:
TEST Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Chen SX, Härdle W, Li M (2003) An empirical likelihood goodness-of-fit test for time series. J R Stat Soc B 65:663–678

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guggenberger P, Smith RJ (2008) Generalized empirical likelihood tests in time series models with potential identification failure. J Econom 142:134–161

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura Y (1997) Empirical likelihood methods with weakly dependent processes. Ann Stat 25:2084–2102

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura Y, Stutzer M (1997) An information-theoretic alternative to generalized method of moments estimation. Econometrica 65:861–874

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Künsch HR (1989) The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. Ann Stat 17:1217–1241

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Monti AC (1997) Empirical likelihood confidence regions in time series models. Biometrika 84:395–405

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Newey WK, West KD (1994) Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Rev Econ Stud 61:631–654

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nordman DJ, Lahiri SN (2006) A frequency domain empirical likelihood for short- and long-range dependence. Ann Stat 34:3019–3050

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Otsu T (2006) Generalized empirical likelihood inference for nonlinear and time series models under weak identification. Econ Theory 22:513–527

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Velasco.

Additional information

This comment refers to the invited paper available at: doi:10.1007/s11749-009-0159-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Velasco, C. Comments on: A review on empirical likelihood methods for regression. TEST 18, 455–457 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-009-0162-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-009-0162-x

Keywords

Navigation