Abstract
The HEART score is a simple scoring system, ranging from 0 to 10, specifically developed for risk stratification of patients with undifferentiated chest pain. It has been validated for the conventional troponin, but not for high-sensitive troponin. We assess a modified version of the HEART score using a single high-sensitivity troponin T dosage at presentation, regardless of symptom duration, and with different ECG criteria to evaluate if the patients with a low HEART score could be safely discharged early. The secondary aim was to confirm a statistically significant difference in each HEART score group (low 0–3, intermediate 4–6, high 7–10) in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events at 30 and 180 days. We retrospectively analyzed the HEART score of 1597 consecutive patients admitted to the Emergency Department of our Hospital for chest pain between January 1 and June 30, 2014. Of these, 190 did not meet the inclusion criteria and 29 were lost to follow-up. None of the 512 (37.2 %) patients with a low HEART score had an event within 180 days. The difference between the cumulative incidences of events in the three HEART score groups was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). We demonstrate that it might be possible to safely discharge Emergency Department chest pain patients with a low modified HEART score after an initial determination of high-sensitive troponin T, without a prolonged observation period or an additional cardiac testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA et al (2010) Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 122(17):1756–1776
Apgar V (1953) A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the new born infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg 32(4):260–267
Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC et al (2013) A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the Emergency Department. Int J Cardiol 168:2153–2158
Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC et al (2010) Chest pain in the emergency Room. A multicenter validation of the HEART score. Crit Pathw Cardiol 9:164–169
Six AJ, Cullen L, Backus BE et al (2013) The HEART score for the assessment of patients with chest pain in the Emergency Department. A multinational validation study. Crit Pathw Cardiol 12:121–126
Six AJ, Backus BE, Kelder JC (2008) Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART Score. Neth Heart J 16:191–196
Thygesen K, Alpert JSA, Jaffe AS et al (2012) The Writing Group on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1581–1598
Lee TH, Goldman L (2000) Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 342:1187–1195
Mahler SA, Hiestand BC, Goff DC, Hoekstra JW, Miller CD (2011) Can the HEART score safely reduce stress testing and cardiac imaging in patients at low risk for major adverse cardiac events? Crit Pathw Cardiol 10:128–133
Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S et al (2011) The Task Force for the management of ACS in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the ESC. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 32:2999–3054
Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ et al (2000) The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 284(7):835–842
Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O et al (2003) Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 163(19):2345–2353
Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M et al (2007) Risk scores for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: useful but simpler is not necessarily better. Eur Heart J 28(9):1072–1078
Zhelev Z, Hyde C, Youngman E et al (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of single baseline measurement of Elecsys Troponin T high-sensitive assay for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in emergency department: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 350:h15
O’Connor RE, Bossaert L, Arntz HR et al (2010) Part 9: acute coronary syndromes: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation 122:S422–S465
Mahler SA, Miller CD, Hollander JE et al (2013) Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain. Int J Cardiol 168(2):795–802
Lyon R, Morris AC, Caesar D, Gray S, Gray A (2007) Chest pain presenting to the emergency department—to stratify risk with GRACE or TIMI? Resuscitation 74:90–93
Than M, Cullen L, Reid CM et al (2011) A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia–Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study. Lancet 377:1077–1084
Poldevaart JM, Reitsma JB, Koffijberg H et al (2013) The impact of the HEART risk score in the early assessment of patients with acute chest pain design of a stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 13:77
Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R et al (2000) Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 342:1163–1170
Prasad V, Cheung M, Cifu A (2012) Chest pain in the emergency department: the case against our current practice of routine noninvasive testing. Arch Intern Med 172(19):1506–1509
Giannitsis E, Kurz K, Hallermayer K et al (2010) Analytical validation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. Clin Chem 56:254–261
Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S et al (2009) Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med 361:858–867
Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D et al (2009) Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 361:868–877
Carlton EW, Khattab A, Greaves K (2015) Identifying patients suitable for discharge after a single-presentation high-sensitivity troponin result: a comparison of five established risk scores and two high-sensitivity assays. Ann Emerg Med 66(6):635–645
Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC Jr et al (2009) American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 120(22):2271–2306
Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM et al (2013) 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(23):e179–e347
Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonson E, Rautaharju P, Punsar S (1960) The Electrocardiogram in population studies: a classification system. Circulation 21:1160–1175
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and animal rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santi, L., Farina, G., Gramenzi, A. et al. The HEART score with high-sensitive troponin T at presentation: ruling out patients with chest pain in the emergency room. Intern Emerg Med 12, 357–364 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-016-1461-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-016-1461-3