Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fecal calprotectin and ulcerative colitis endoscopic activity index as indicators of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis

  • IM - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic, idiopathic, inflammatory large bowel disease with recurrent variable periods of exacerbation. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the correlation of UCEIS with fecal calprotectin (FC) level to assess disease activity in UC patients in order to determine whether FC can prognosticate clinical outcome and disease activity of UC instead of colonoscopic evaluation. Our endoscopic investigations revealed the extension of UC as the following: proctitis (11.6 %), procto-sigmoiditis (18.5 %), left-sided colitis (15.8 %), extensive colitis (11.7 %), and normal endoscopy (42.4 %). Conclusively, we suggest that FC can be used as a reliable tool to evaluate disease activity in ulcerative colitis patients. Moreover, our findings indicate a significant correlation between FC level and mucosal healing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langhorst J, Elsenbruch S, Mueller T et al (2005) Comparison of 4 neutrophil-derived proteins in feces as indicators of disease activity in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11(12):1085–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fefferman DS, Farrell RJ (2005) Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: indications, surveillance, and use in clinical practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 3(1):11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schoepfer AM, Beglinger C, Straumann A et al (2009) Ulcerative colitis: correlation of the Rachmilewitz endoscopic activity index with fecal calprotectin, clinical activity, C-reactive protein, and blood leukocytes. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15(12):1851–1858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Angriman I, Scarpa M, D’Inca R et al (2007) Enzymes in feces: useful markers of chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Chim Acta; International Journal Of Clinical Chemistry. 381(1):63–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Travis SP, Schnell D, Krzeski P et al (2013) Reliability and initial validation of the ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity. Gastroenterology 145(5):987–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh AJ, Ghosh A, Brain AO et al (2014) Comparing disease activity indices in ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 8(4):318–325

  7. Carpenter HA, Talley NJ (2000) The importance of clinicopathological correlation in the diagnosis of inflammatory conditions of the colon: histological patterns with clinical implications. Am J Gastroenterol 95(4):878–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikolaus S, Schreiber S (2007) Diagnostics of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 133(5):1670–1689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vermeire S, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P (2006) Laboratory markers in IBD: useful, magic, or unnecessary toys? Gut 55(3):426–431

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Desai D, Faubion WA, Sandborn WJ (2007) Review article: biological activity markers in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25(3):247–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gisbert JP, Gonzalez-Lama Y, Mate J (2007) Role of biological markers in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol 30(3):117–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tibble JA, Sigthorsson G, Bridger S et al (2000) Surrogate markers of intestinal inflammation are predictive of relapse in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 119(1):15–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tibble JA, Bjarnason I (2001) Non-invasive investigation of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 7(4):460–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bitton A, Peppercorn MA, Antonioli DA et al (2001) Clinical, biological, and histologic parameters as predictors of relapse in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 120(1):13–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sutherland AD, Gearry RB, Frizelle FA (2008) Review of fecal biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease. Dis Colon Rectum 51(8):1283–1291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Geboes K, Riddell R, Ost A et al (2000) A reproducible grading scale for histological assessment of inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Gut 47(3):404–409

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bjerke K, Halstensen TS, Jahnsen F et al (1993) Distribution of macrophages and granulocytes expressing L1 protein (calprotectin) in human Peyer’s patches compared with normal ileal lamina propria and mesenteric lymph nodes. Gut 34(10):1357–1363

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Costa F, Mumolo MG, Ceccarelli L et al (2005) Calprotectin is a stronger predictive marker of relapse in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn’s disease. Gut 54(3):364–368

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johne B, Fagerhol MK, Lyberg T et al (1997) Functional and clinical aspects of the myelomonocyte protein calprotectin. Mol Pathol 50(3):113–123

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Konikoff MR, Denson LA (2006) Role of fecal calprotectin as a biomarker of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 12(6):524–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiang JY, Ouyang Q, Li GD et al (2008) Clinical value of fecal calprotectin in determining disease activity of ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol 14(1):53–57

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Langhorst J, Elsenbruch S, Koelzer J et al (2008) Noninvasive markers in the assessment of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases: performance of fecal lactoferrin, calprotectin, and PMN-elastase, CRP, and clinical indices. Am J Gastroenterol 103(1):162–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Canani RB, Terrin G, Rapacciuolo L et al (2008) Faecal calprotectin as reliable non-invasive marker to assess the severity of mucosal inflammation in children with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Liver Dis : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. 40(7):547–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Silberer H, Kuppers B, Mickisch O et al (2005) Fecal leukocyte proteins in inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Lab 51(3–4):117–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gisbert JP, McNicholl AG (2009) Questions and answers on the role of faecal calprotectin as a biological marker in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Liver Dis: official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. 41(1):56–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Garcia-Sanchez V, Iglesias-Flores E, Gonzalez R et al (2010) Does fecal calprotectin predict relapse in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis? J Crohns Colitis 4(2):144–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. D’Haens G, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG et al (2007) A review of activity indices and efficacy end points for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 132(2):763–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Naganuma M, Ichikawa H, Inoue N et al (2010) Novel endoscopic activity index is useful for choosing treatment in severe active ulcerative colitis patients. J Gastroenterol 45(9):936–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Travis SP, Schnell D, Krzeski P et al (2012) Developing an instrument to assess the endoscopic severity of ulcerative colitis: the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS). Gut 61(4):535–542

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rachmilewitz D (1989) Coated mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) versus sulphasalazine in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a randomised trial. BMJ 298(6666):82–86

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cooney RM, Warren BF, Altman DG et al (2007) Outcome measurement in clinical trials for Ulcerative Colitis: towards standardisation. Trials 8:17

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gisbert JP, Bermejo F, Perez-Calle JL et al (2009) Fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin for the prediction of inflammatory bowel disease relapse. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15(8):1190–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaiser T, Langhorst J, Wittkowski H et al (2007) Faecal S100A12 as a non-invasive marker distinguishing inflammatory bowel disease from irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 56(12):1706–1713

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iradj Maleki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taghvaei, T., Maleki, I., Nagshvar, F. et al. Fecal calprotectin and ulcerative colitis endoscopic activity index as indicators of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis. Intern Emerg Med 10, 321–328 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1144-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1144-x

Keywords

Navigation