Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of plant growth regulators and their interaction with electric current on winter wheat development

Acta Physiologiae Plantarum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the experiments presented here was twofold. On the one hand, to study the influence of plant growth regulators, i.e. auxins (IAA and NAA), cytokinins (kinetin, zeatin and zeatin riboside), gibberellins: (GA3) and polyamines (spermidine, spermine and putrescine) on the generative development of winter wheat plants, while on the other to study the interaction of plant growth regulators with electric current in affecting the efficiency of the flowering of wheat plants. Winter wheat var. Grana was subjected to a short vernalization (2 weeks at 5°C + 10 days at 10°C) on Murashige and Skoog medium containing growth regulators at different concentrations. For selected substances, seedlings were additionally treated with electric current by applying a constant voltage for a given period of time (30 V for 30 s or 1.5 V for 1 h) with the anode or the cathode inserted into apical leaves and the reference electrode into the media. After that, the seedlings were transferred to a glasshouse (20/17°C) where they were grown until heading was achieved. All the substances studied stimulated the generative development of winter wheat, in contrast to non-treated plants (control), especially at their highest concentrations. Spermidine, kinetin and GA3 were the most effective in this process as they stimulated 100–80% of generative plants (whereas for the control the percentage stood at only 30% plants). The studied regulators also increased the rate of generative development, i.e. shortening the length of the vegetative phase (by about 30% in comparison with the control). Moreover, these substances treatments decreased the fresh mass of both seedlings and flowering plants and increased the number of spikelets in the ear. The electric current treatment interacted with the applied substances: the anode insertion into the leaves generally increased, whereas the cathode insertion decreased, the inductive effect of the growth regulators on generative development. However, the inhibition of the flowering process was more pronounced than the induction. Moreover, the passage of electric current shortened the time to heading. This decrease in the length of the vegetative phase was more visible after the anode was inserted into the leaves. The least noticeable effect of the electric current interaction with plant growth regulators on both the generative development and the time of heading was observed for auxins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IAA:

Indole-3-acetic acid

GA3 :

Gibberellic acid

KIN:

Kinetin

NAA:

Naphthalene-1-acetic acid

Put:

Putrescine

Spd:

Spermidine

Spm:

Spermine

Z:

Zeatin

ZR:

Zeatin riboside

References

  • Adamec L, Macháčková I, Krekule J, Nováková M (1989) Electric current inhibits flowering in short-day plant Chenopodium rubrum L. J Plant Physiol 134:43–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Aloni R, Aloni E, Langhans M, Ullrich CI (2006) Role of auxin in regulating Arabidopsis flower development. Planta 223:315–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bais HP, Sudha GS, Ravishankar GA (2000) Putrescine and silver nitrate influences shoot multiplication, in vitro flowering and endogenous titters of polyamines in Cichorium intybus L. cv. Lucknow local. J Plant Growth Regul 19:238–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernier G (1988) The control of floral evocation and morphogenesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Mol Biol 39:175–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernier G, Pérrilleux C (2005) A physiological overview of the genetics of flowering time control. Plant Biotechnol J 3:3–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernier G, Havelange A, Houssa C, Petitjean A, Lejeune P (1993) Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 5:1147–1155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernier G, Corbesier L, Perilleux C (2002) The flowering Process. On the track of controlling factors in Sinapsis alba. Russ J Plant Physiol 49:445–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biesaga-Kościelniak J, Dubert F, Marcińska I, Kościelniak J (1996) Stimulation of generative development of winter wheat by the extracts from inflorescence of various crop plants. Acta Physiol Plant 18:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Blázquez MA, Weigel D (2000) Integration of floral inductive signals in Arabidopsis. Nature 404:889–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buzgol M, Douglas E, Soltis SP, Ma H (2006) Towards a comprehensive integration of morphological and genetic studies of floral development. Trends Plant Sci 9:164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbesier L, Coupland G (2006) The quest for florigen: a review of recent progress. J Exp Bot 205:3395–3403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies PJ (2004) Plant hormones. Biosynthesis, signal transduction action. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 18–35

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dios P, Matilla AJ, Gallardo M (2006) Flower fertilization and fruit development prompt changes in free polyamines and ethylene in damson plum (Prunus insititia L.). J. Plant Physiol 163:86–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubert F, Marcińska I, Biesaga-Kościelniak J, Szmider I (1993) The effectiveness of vernalization of immature embryos of winter wheat var. Grana as related to age and exogenous phytohormones. J Agron Crop Sci 170:234–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filek M, Biesaga-Kościelniak J, Marcińska I, Krekule J, Macháčková I (2002) Direct electric current partly replaces the chilling effect in vernalisation of winter wheat. J Plant Physiol 159:795–797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filek M, Biesaga-Kościelniak J, Marcińska I, Krekule J, Macháčková I (2003) The effects of electric current on flowering of grafted scions of non-vernalized winter rape. Biol Plant 46:625–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoffriau E, Kahane R, Martin-Tanguy J (2006) Polyamines are involved in the gynogenesis process in onion. Physiol Plant 127:119–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenboim-Wainberg G, Maymon I, Borochov R, Alvarez J, Olszewski N, Ori N, Eshed Y, Weiss D (2005) Cross Talk between gibberellin and cytokinin: the Arabidopsis GA response inhibitor SPINDLY plays a positive role in cytokinin signaling. Plant Cell 17:92–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks GR, Rees AR (1980) Partly cooled tulips: response to GA3 and other gibberellins. Acta Hortic 109:169–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazebroek JP, Metzger JD, Mansager ER (1993) Thermoinductive regulation of gibberellin metabolism in Thlaspi arvense L. II. Cold induction of enzymes in gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 102:547–552

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heide OM, Bush MG, Evans LT (1985) Interaction of photoperiod and gibberellin on growth and photosynthesis of high-latitude Poa pratensis. Physiol Plant 65:135–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson IR, Chikako S, Dean C (2003) The need for winter in the switch to flowering. Annu Rev Genet 37:371–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Cerny RE, Qi YL, Bhat D, Aydt CM, Hanson DD, Malloy KP, Ness LA (2003) Transgenic studies on the involvement of cytokinin and gibberellin in male development. Plant Physiol 131:1270–1282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur-Sawhney R, Tiburcio AF, Altabella T, Galston AW (2003) Polyamines in plants: an overview. J Cell Mol Biol 2:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepinski S, Leyser O (2005) Plant development: auxin in loops. Curr Biol 15:208–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King RW, Evans LT (2003) Gibberellins and flowering of grasses and cereals: prizing open the lid of the “florigen” black box. Ann Rev Plant Biol 54:307–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraepiel Y, Miginiac E (1997) Photomorphogenesis and phytohormones. Plant Cell Environ 20:807–812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Listowski A (1970) About development of plants (in Polish). PWN, Warszawa, pp 111–112

  • Liu JH, Kitashiba H, Wang J, Ban Y, Moriguchi T (2007) Polyamines and their ability to provide environmental stress tolerance to plants. Plant Biotechnol 24:117–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macháčková I, Pospíšková M, Krekule J (1990) Further studies on the inhibitory action of direct electric current on flowering in the short-day plant Chenopodium rubrum L. J Plant Physiol 136:381–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Macháčková I, Krekule J, Eder J, Seidlova F, Strnad M (1993) Cytokinins in photoperiodic induction of flowering in Chenopodium species. Physiol Plant 87:160–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier H, Endres L (1999) Alteration of hormonal levels in a rootless epiphytic bromeliad in different phenological phases. J Plant Growth Regul 18:121–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier H, Souza BM, Kraus JE, Hamasaki RM, Sotta B (2003) Endogenous auxin and cytokinin contents associated with shoot formation in leaves of pineapple cultured in vitro. Braz J Plant Physiol 15:107–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milyaeva EL, Romanov GA (2002) Molecular genetics returns to basic postulates. Russ J Plant Physiol 49:438–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montavon M, Greppin H (1983) Effet sur le dévelopment de l’épinard de l’application d’un potential électriuqe sur le pétiol d’une feuille. Saussurea Genéve 14:79–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Montavon M, Greppin H (1986) Développement apical de l’épinard et l’application d’un potentiel électrique de contrainte. Saussurea Genève 17:85–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel L, Brewster R, Riedell E, Reese RN (2001) Cytokinin regulation of flower and pod set in soybeans (Glycine max (L.) (Merr.). Ann Bot 88:27–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ori N, Eshed Y, Chuck G, Bowman JL, Hake S (2000) Mechanisms that control knox gene expression in the Arabidopsis shoot. Development 127:5523–5532

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rebers M, Vermeer E, Knegt E, Shelton CJ, Linus H, van der Plas LHW (1995) Gibberellin levels and cold-induced floral stalk elongation in tulip. Physiol Plant 94:687–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samuolienė G, Duchovskis P, Urbonavičiūtė A (2005) Phytohormones dynamics during flowering initiation in carrots. Acta Biol Szeged 49:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney VK, Shukla A (1994) Male sterility in flowering plants: are plant growth substances involved? Am J Bot 81:1640–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava LM (2002) Plant growth and development: hormones and environment. Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanewich KP, Rood SB (1995) Vernalization and gibberellin physiology of winter canola. Plant Physiol 108:615–621

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Biesaga-Kościelniak.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Trebacz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biesaga-Kościelniak, J., Kościelniak, J., Filek, M. et al. The effect of plant growth regulators and their interaction with electric current on winter wheat development. Acta Physiol Plant 32, 987–995 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0488-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0488-8

Keywords

Navigation