Skip to main content
Log in

Blinding effect of non-penetrating sham needle in the randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A systematic review

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this article was to assess the clinical evidence for or against the blinding effect of non-penetrating sham needle as placebo needle. This systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture taking non-penetrating sham acupuncture as placebo needle. Systematic searches were conducted in 13 electronic databases up to July 2012: Medline, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, a Chinese medical database. All parallel or cross-over RCTs of acupuncture for the blinding effect of non-penetrating needle were chosen without language restrictions. Finally, totally 7 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that the non-penetrating needle is an effective instrument for placebo control in the acupuncture RCTs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enblom A, Johnsson A, Hammar M, Steineck G, Börjeson S. The nonpenetrating telescopic sham needle may blind patients with different characteristics and experiences when treated by several therapists. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2011: 185034.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee H, Bang H, Kim Y, Park J, Lee S, Lee H, Park HJ. Non-penetrating sham needle, is it an adequate sham control in acupuncture research? Complement Ther Med, 2011, 19(Suppl 1): S41–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Takakura N, Yajima H. A double-blind placebo needle for acupuncture research. BMC Complement Altern Med, 2007, 7: 31.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goddard G, Shen Y, Steele B, Springer N. A controlled trial of placebo versus real acupuncture. J Pain, 2005, 6(4): 237–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Enblom A, Hammar M, Steineck G, Börjeson S. Can individuals identify if needling was performed with an acupuncture needle or a non-penetrating sham needle? Complement Ther Med, 2008, 16(5): 288–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim S. Creating an instrument for a successful double-blind acupuncture placebo. J Acupunct Meridian Stud, 2008, 1(1): 36–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chae Y, Um SI, Yi SH, Lee H, Chang DS, Yin CS, Park HJ. Comparison of biomechanical properties between acupuncture and non-penetrating sham needle. Complement Ther Med, 2011, 19(Suppl 1): S8–S12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lai X, Zhang G, Huang Y, Tang C, Yang J, Wang S, Zhou SF. A cerebral functional imaging study by positron emission tomography in healthy volunteers receiving true or sham acupuncture needling. Neurosci Lett, 2009, 452(2): 194–199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu J, Wang JY, Liu JL, Zhu B. Placebo control in the design of acupuncture clinical trials. Zhenci Yanjiu, 2007, 32(6): 389–392.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dhond RP, Kettner N, Napadow V. Do the neural correlates of acupuncture and placebo effects differ? Pain, 2007, 128(1–2): 8–12.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu HL, Zhang Y, Li JD, Chen P, Wang LP. Design and practice of acupuncture placebo-controlled method in clinical studies of acupuncture. Zhongguo Xunzheng Yixue Zazhi, 2008, 8(12): 1133–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang HY, Guo TT, Min YJ, Liu TY, Gao M. Effect of emulation acupuncture pretreatment on the behavior of rats with visceral traction pain and its mechanism. Shanghai Zhenjiu Zazhi, 2009, 28(12): 732–737.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu ET, Wang SX, Lai XS, Huang Y, Tang CZ, Cui SY. 18F-FDG PET brain imaging study of the mechanism of cerebellar response to acupuncture at point Waiguan (SJ 5). Shanghai Zhenjiu Zazhi, 2012, 31(7): 453–456.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu Wang.

Additional information

Author: Gong Xing-lan, master of medicine, resident physician

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gong, Xl., Pan, Zh., Shen, Y. et al. Blinding effect of non-penetrating sham needle in the randomized controlled trials of acupuncture: A systematic review. J. Acupunct. Tuina. Sci. 12, 8–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11726-014-0738-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11726-014-0738-1

Key Words

CLC Number

Navigation